November 16, 2010

NATO Is Razing Booby-Trapped Afghan Homes

By TAIMOOR SHAH and
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/n/rod_nordland/i
ndex.html?inline=nyt-per> ROD NORDLAND

New York Times

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan - In the newly won districts around this southern
city, American forces are encountering empty homes and farm buildings left
so heavily booby-trapped by
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/t/taliban
/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Taliban insurgents that the Americans have been
systematically destroying hundreds of them, according to local Afghan
authorities. 

The  <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/world/asia/27afghan.html> campaign,
a major departure from
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/north_a
tlantic_treaty_organization/index.html?inline=nyt-org> NATO practice in past
military operations, is intended to reduce civilian and military casualties
by removing the threat of booby traps and denying Taliban insurgents hiding
places and fighting positions, American military officials said. 

While it has widespread support among Afghan officials and even some
residents, and has been accompanied by an equally determined effort to hand
out cash compensation to homeowners, other local people have complained that
the demolitions have gone far beyond what is necessary. 

It would also seem to run counter to Gen.
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/p/david_h_petrae
us/index.html?inline=nyt-per> David H. Petraeus's counterinsurgency
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/17/world/17prexy.html> strategy, which calls
for respecting property as well as lives, and to run up against recent calls
by President
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/hamid_karzai/i
ndex.html?inline=nyt-per> Hamid Karzai for foreign forces to lower their
profile and avoid tactics that alienate Afghan civilians. There have been no
reports of civilians casualties from the demolitions. 

General Petraeus, the NATO commander in
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/af
ghanistan/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> Afghanistan, has recently pointed to
progress in routing the Taliban in Kandahar, thanks to 30,000 additional
troops, although the insurgents have countered that they have simply gone
into hiding to wait out the American push. 

What they have left behind are vacant houses and farm buildings so heavily
rigged that soldiers have started referring to them as house-borne
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/i/improvised_e
xplosive_devices/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier> improvised explosive
devices. 

In recent weeks, using armored bulldozers, high explosives, missiles and
even airstrikes, American troops have taken to destroying hundreds of them,
by a conservative estimate, with some estimates running into the thousands. 

"We don't know the accurate number of homes destroyed, but it's huge," said
Zalmai Ayubi, the spokesman for the Kandahar provincial governor, Tooryalai
Wesa, and who with the governor visited on Oct. 21. "It's the insurgents and
the enemy of the country that are to blame for this destruction, because
they have planted mines in civilian houses and main roads everywhere." 

Lt. Col. Webster Wright, the spokesman for NATO forces in Kandahar, said he
did not know how many homes had been destroyed in the campaign, but put the
number of deliberate demolitions since September at 174, including homes and
other structures. 

The number seemed well below the destruction indicated by the accounts of
local officials. 

In the most fiercely contested areas, especially in Zhare District, but also
in parts of neighboring Panjwai and Arghandab Districts, American troops
have been routinely destroying almost every unoccupied home or unused farm
building in areas where they are operating. 

In Arghandab District, for instance, every one of the 40 homes in the
village of Khosrow was flattened by a salvo of 25 missiles, according to the
district governor, Shah Muhammed Ahmadi, who estimated that 120 to 130
houses had been demolished in his district. "There was no other way; we knew
people wanted us to get rid of all these deadly I.E.D.'s," he said,
referring to improvised explosive devices, the military's term for homemade
bombs. 

"In some villages where only a few houses were contaminated by bombs, we
called the owners and got their agreement to destroy them," Mr. Ahmadi said.
"In some villages like Khosrow that were completely empty and full of
I.E.D.'s, we destroyed them without agreement because it was hard to find
the people. 

"And not just Khosrow, but many villages," he said, listing a half-dozen
others. "We had to destroy them to make them safe." 

Military units in the field have been seen keeping meticulous records,
recording not only every house they blow up, but also every grape-drying
shed, retaining wall, tree and vine, and entering that data into
computerized systems. 

"I don't know exactly how many people have received compensation yet, but
there are hundreds of people waiting to claim for their losses and many who
already have put in claims," said Karim Jan, the governor of Zhare District,
where the destruction of homes has been most extensive. In neighboring
Panjwai District, Gov. Baran Khaksar said 60 families had been compensated
for destruction of their homes or other property. 

Responding to questions about whether house demolitions contradicted
counterinsurgency strategy, Col. Hans E. Bush, a press aide speaking on
behalf of General Petraeus, said the steps had been taken to safeguard the
local residents. 

"The buildings in question posed a threat to everyone in the area since they
were rigged with explosives and booby-trapped in a way to prevent E.O.D.
personnel from rendering them safe," he said referring to the American
Explosive Ordnance Disposal teams. 

American troops are using an impressive array of tools not only to demolish
homes, but also to eliminate tree lines where insurgents could hide, blow up
outbuildings, flatten agricultural walls, and carve new "military roads,"
because existing ones are so heavily mined, according to journalists
embedded in the area recently. 

One of the most fearsome tools is the Miclic, the M58 Mine-Clearing Line
Charge, a chain of explosives tied to a rocket, which upon impact destroys
everything in a swath 30 feet wide and 325 feet long. The Himars missile
system, a pod of 13-foot rockets carrying 200-pound warheads, has also been
used frequently for demolition work. 

Often, new military roads go right through farms and compounds, cutting a
route that will keep soldiers safe from roadside bombs. In Zhare District
alone, the 101st Airborne's Second Brigade has lost 30 soldiers since last
June, mostly to such bombs. 

Activists at the organization Afghanistan Rights Monitor have been critical
of the campaign. "These are all mud houses, quite humble houses," said Akmal
Dawi, of the group, "so they are just taking the easiest way and saying, 'We
will destroy them and then help them rebuild, give them a couple hundred
dollars and show we are on their side.' " 

However, with winter approaching and the fight continuing, owners are not
likely to begin rebuilding anytime soon. "It's not enough," Mr. Dawi said.
"People will not be satisfied with that." 

The number of refugees from the districts around Kandahar is difficult to
determine, because most of them stay with relatives or friends in the city,
but local officials estimate that nearly 1,000 families have fled Zhare and
Arghandab in the past month alone. Many others left before military
operations stepped up, fleeing Taliban domination in the area. 

Abdul Rahim Khan, 50, a tribal elder from Spirwan in Panjwai District,
claimed that in many cases the American troops had been destroying empty
homes, even when there were not any explosives inside. However, military
officers pointed out, searching empty homes was often too dangerous. 

"People are not happy with the compensation," said a tribal elder in Zhare,
who said he was afraid to give his name for publication. "Compensation is
just kicking dirt in our eyes." 

Taimoor Shah reported from Kandahar, and Rod Nordland from Kabul,
Afghanistan. Christoph Bangert contributed reporting from Zhare,
Afghanistan.

 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to