http://tinyurl.com/2aumfa4 <ttp://tinyurl.com/2aumfa4%22> 


California DA Vows to Prosecute Airport Screeners Who Touch Travelers 
Inappropriately


Published November 17, 2010

The public outcry over the government's new pat-downs gained momentum 
Wednesday, as a California district attorney vowed to prosecute any complaints 
of inappropriate touching by airport security screeners and a U.S. congressman 
called for screeners to receive improved training. 

The developments came as the head of the Transportation Security Administration 
<ttp://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/transportation-security-administration.htm#r_src=ramp%22>
 , John Pistole, acknowledged that the new pat-downs are more invasive than 
what travelers were used to in the past.

The "enhanced" pat-downs of airline passengers who opt out of using the 
high-tech body scanners require screeners to touch travellers' breasts or 
genitals. 

Airline passenger John Tyner drew national attention after recording on his 
cell phone an encounter with a TSA screener in which Tyner warned he would have 
the male screener arrested if he touched "my junk." Tyler was thrown out of San 
Diego International Airport and faces a $10,000 fine if he is sued by the TSA. 

Steve Wagstaffe, the incoming district attorney in San Mateo County, told 
FoxNews.com that he would charge screeners with sexual battery for complaints 
of inappropriate touching with sexual or lewd intent.

But if the complaint is simply that a TSA screener went too far with a 
pat-down, "That's not a crime," Wagstaffe said.

"It becomes a crime when someone does that touching, reaches under the blouse 
and fondles breasts," he said. "That's a crime under California law."

If convicted of a misdemeanor, TSA screeners would face up to one year in the 
county jail; for a felony, which would involve skin-on-skin contact, they would 
face up to three years in state prison.

Wagstaffe said he has not received a complaint yet and he believes all the 
attention on airport screening will cause TSA to be more careful.

After appearing on a Fox News show, Pistole declined to comment to FoxNews.com 
about Wagstaffe's comments.

Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the House Homeland Security 
Committee, is calling for improved training procedures after a government 
report found some flaws with the oversight of TSA's training program.

"In light of recent aviation security events and the new pat down process for 
screening passengers, training is more important than ever in both securing the 
aviation system and maintaining suitable privacy and customer service 
standards," he said in a written statement. "Training is the critical lynchpin 
in an effective aviation security program. Without suitable training, 
technology and established screening processes are ineffective."

The Office of Inspector General in the Department of Homeland Security released 
a report that showed TSA did not establish a lead office to organize and 
coordinate the training program until 2006, and that office didn't actively 
start overseeing the program until 2009.

"Without a documented process for updating training based on screener 
performance data and changes in technology or equipment, the Transportation 
Security Administration may be missing opportunities to enhance its officers' 
skills and abilities," the report read.

In testimony to a Senate committee about TSA policies and procedures, Pistole 
said he has received the new pat-down, as has his boss, Homeland Security 
Secretary Janet Napolitano 
<ttp://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/janet-napolitano.htm#r_src=ramp%22>
 .

Pistole said he understands the privacy concerns but added that the government 
must provide the best possible security for air travelers.



Read more: 
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/17/california-da-vows-prosecute-complaints-tsa-screeners-gone-wild/#ixzz15bwEJkxb
 
<ttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/17/california-da-vows-prosecute-complaints-tsa-screeners-gone-wild/#ixzz15bwEJkxb%22>
 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to