<http://tinyurl.com/2b9d6qq> 
http://tinyurl.com/2b9d6qq

  'Birthright citizenship' will be target of House GOP majority

   
    * Posted on Thursday, November 18, 2010


          By Rob Hotakainen | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — As one of its first acts, the new Congress will consider
denying citizenship to the children of illegal
immigrants who are born in the United States.

Those children, who are now automatically granted citizenship at birth, will
be one of the first targets of the
Republican-led House when it convenes in January.

GOP Rep. Steve King of Iowa, the incoming chairman of the subcommittee that
oversees immigration, is expected to push a bill that would deny "birthright
citizenship" to such children.

The measure, assailed by critics as unconstitutional, is an indication of
how the new majority intends to flex its muscles on the volatile issue of
illegal immigration.

The idea has a growing list of supporters, including Republican Reps. Tom
McClintock of Elk Grove and Dan Lungren of Gold River, but it has aroused
intense opposition, as
well.

"I don't like it," said Chad Silva, statewide policy analyst for the Latino
Coalition for a Healthy California. "It's been something that's been a part
of America for a very long time. … For us,
it sort of flies in the face of what America is about."

Republicans, Silva said, are "going in there and starting to monkey with the
Constitution."

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, guarantees
citizenship to anyone born or naturalized in the United States. It was
intended to make sure that children of freed slaves were granted U.S.
citizenship.

While opponents say King's bill would clearly be unconstitutional, backers
say the 14th Amendment would not apply. The amendment states that anyone
born in the United States and "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" is a
citizen.

King said the amendment would not apply to the children of illegal
immigrants because their parents should not be in the country anyway. He
said immigration law
should not create incentives for people to enter the country illegally and
that it's creating an "anchor baby industry."

"Many of these illegal aliens are giving birth to children in the United
States so that they can have uninhibited access to taxpayer-funded benefits
and to
citizenship for as many family members as possible," King said.

An estimated 340,000 of the 4.3 million babies born in the United States in
2008 were the children of undocumented immigrants, according to an
analysis of Census Bureau data by the Pew Hispanic Center done last
year.

The issue is dividing Republicans, too.

"We find both this rhetoric and this unconstitutional conduct reprehensible,
insulting and a poor reflection upon Republicans," DeeDee Blasé, the founder
of
Somos Republicans, a Latino GOP organization based in the Southwestern
states, said in a letter to House Republican leaders.

Silva said the Republican plan is "not the fix," adding that the citizenship
of children born to immigrants was never an issue during the immigration
tide at the turn of the 20th century and that it shouldn't be now.

"That's our strength," he said. "And to start splitting hairs like that will
only make the immigration issue worse."

Democratic Rep. Doris Matsui of Sacramento called King's plan "both
unconstitutional and shortsighted."

"The 14th Amendment to the Constitution grants American citizenship to
anyone born on American soil," she said. "I firmly believe we must
reform the current immigration system, but we need to do so comprehensively
with policies that respect our nation's history,
strengthen our borders, and help our economy."

McClintock outlined his position last summer in a rebuttal to a newspaper
editorial: "If illegal immigration is to be rewarded with birthright
citizenship,
public benefits and amnesty, it becomes impossible to maintain our
immigration laws and the process of assimilation that they assure," he
wrote.

McClintock noted that the United Kingdom, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand,
France and India have all changed their laws in recent years to require that
at least one parent be a legal resident for the child to become a legal
citizen.

Lungren, who served as California's attorney general from 1990 to 1998
introduced a similar bill in 2007, but it did not pass the House, which was
controlled by
Democrats at the time.

His bill called for defining what "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
means. Lungren proposed that the clause would apply to any person born to a
parent who is a citizen, a legal
alien or an alien serving in the military.



Read more:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/18/103946/birthright-citizenship...
<http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/11/18/103946/birthright-citizenship-will-be
.html?storylink=addthis#ixzz15gZcBnzP>

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Reply via email to