http://tinyurl.com/2wv78b8

 

November 27, 2010

MidEast Democracy Wains w/Agenda of US Administration

Gulf Countries Advised to Avoid Egypt-Style Democracy

 
<http://waronterrornews.typepad.com/.a/6a00e551d9d3fd88330147e031f476970b-po
pup> Map middle_east-19th CenturyPhilip Walter Wellman | Dubai VoA News

Last month, the prime minister of Bahrain Khalifa bin Salman al-Khalifa was
all smiles as he voted in his country's parliamentary elections in front of
a swarm of cameramen. But outside the polling station, the situation was
much less jovial.

Opposition parties were complaining of arbitrary arrests and some media
outlets said they had been shutdown by the government.

A similar situation allegedly has been unfolding in Egypt in the run-up to
its parliamentary elections scheduled to be held on November 28.

Middle East analyst at IHS Global Insight Sara Hassan says it is a worrying
trend.

"I think these countries are struggling to deal with the implications of
having a proper democracy and I think they've reverted back," said Hassan.
"So we have seen a certain degree of regression in terms of reform."

Hassan says part of the problem could be a lack of support for democratic
reform in the Gulf from the United States and other Western powers.

"Several years ago there was a huge push for greater democratization in the
region," she said. "It was high on President Bush's agenda, but we've seen
this suddenly start to slip as what are deemed as more important foreign
policy issues take over."

However, Hassan points out that introducing a political model that is not in
tune with local traditions and customs could be equally destabilizing.

The traditionally authoritarian Gulf States have a history of consensus
building and democracy at local levels.

Christopher Davidson of the Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies
at Durham University says these established practices must be incorporated
into any new system.

"What we really need to see, I think, is a kind of democracy in the Gulf
that is connected somehow to the anthropological reality of the region,"
said Davidson. " We haven't quite seen that yet. What we've seen in Kuwait
and Bahrain to some extent are Western-style democratic implants that
haven't quite worked well alongside tribal structures and the system of
consultation that was already in place."

Kuwait and Bahrain are the only Gulf nations that have an elected
parliament, although smaller steps towards more representative governments
have been seen throughout the region.

In every country, ultimate power still lies in the hands of ruling families,
but Davidson says it is only a matter of time before substantial democratic
advances are made.

"All the Gulf States will run dry of hydrocarbons at some point," he said.
"They're putting a lot of emphasis on diversifying their economies, but
without great results yet. So, the bottom line is: Bahrain has more or less
run out of oil and gas, which means its ruling family is no longer able to
distribute wealth and privileges and opportunities to its population in the
way it used to and it's had to give a bit in the form of allowing some
political opening. I think the neighboring Gulf States, especially
ultra-rich Qatar and United Arab Emirates are looking rather fearfully at
what's happening in Bahrain. Could it be something they themselves will have
to face in the not too distant future?"

Despite the controversy surrounding Egypt's upcoming elections, Davidson
says it could lead residents throughout the Gulf to question their
governments.

"I think any genuine elections that do take place elsewhere in the Arab
world, whether Iraq or Egypt, cannot fail but to have some kind of
demonstration effect on the youthful citizens in these Gulf States," he said
"And of course many Arab expats, including Egyptians, live and work in the
Gulf and these ideas must surely cross over into the local population."

Egypt's parliamentary elections precede a presidential vote scheduled for
September next year. But, if history is any indicator, few in the Gulf see
elections as harbingers of regime change. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to