http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30713
Or...I'm Confused!
Global Warming
no Global Cooling
no Global Warming
NO, ITS COOLING!!
By Doug Bronson Saturday, December 4, 2010
I dont know about the rest of you, but Im totally confused. Our president
speaks of global warming and the need to act, and to act now, before our
planet ceases to exist. According to another planet savior, Al Gore, the
Obama administration has taken huge strides towards tackling climate change.
Within one month of taking office Obama had secured $80 billion for
renewable energy and green infrastructure. Gore himself claims urgent
action is needed for a problem not faced before. Or has it? Read on and see
if you become as confused as I am?
Global Cooling:
The discoveries of changes in the suns heat and the southward advance of
glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible
advent of a new ice age. Time Magazine, September 10, 1924.
MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age The New York Times, September 18,
1923
The possibility of another Ice age already having started
is admitted by
men of first rank in the scientific world, men specifically qualified to
speak. The Los Angeles Times, June 28, 1923
Global Warming:
Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite
right
weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being
is growing warmer. Time Magazine, Jan. 2, 1939
America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a
25-Year Rise The New York Times, March 27, 1933
Permafrost in Russia is receding northward up to 100 yards per year. Time
Magazine, 1951
Winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts
growing. U.S. News and World Report, Jan. 8, 1954
Global Cooling
. Again?
Scientists Ponder Why Worlds Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely
Considered to Be Inevitable The New York Times, May 21, 1975
Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the
weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another Ice
Age. Time Magazine, June 24, 1974
North Atlantic sea temperatures declined, and shipping routes were
cluttered with ice. Furthermore, the permafrost in Russia and Canada was
advancing southward. The New York Times, December 29, 1974
There is very important climatic change going on right now
It is something
that, if it continues, will affect the whole human occupation of the earth-
like a billion people starving. Fortune Magazine, from Reid Bryson, February
1974
Back to Global Warming
..Confused Yet??
About 10 million residents of Bangladesh will lose their homes and means of
sustenance because of the rising sea level, due to global warming, in the
next few decades. Al Gore, from Earth in Balance 1992
Billions will die, says Lovelock, who tells us he is not normally a gloomy
type. Human civilization will be reduced to a broken rabble ruled by brutal
warlords, and the plague-ridden remainder of the species will flee the
cracked and broken earth to the Arctic, the last temperate spot, where a few
breeding couples will survive. The Daily Telegraph, February 2, 2006
Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost
nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible. Time
Magazine, April 9, 2001
Past Hot Times Hold Few Reasons to Relax About New Warming The New York
Times, December 27, 2005
The above facts and dates can be found at: businessandmedia.org
<http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialreports/2006/fireandice/fireandice.a
sp>
So you see, the media has written on the dangers of global warming or
cooling for almost a century. Guess what? The sun still rises in the east
and sets in the west. The moon still goes through its phases from full-moon
to new-moon and back again as always. Since Reid Bryson predicting a
billion people starving in 1974, the earths population has increased by
2.5 billion. So, as you see, amid the steady proclamation of doom by the
media, the politicians, and the scientists, life does in fact go on.
Unfortunately the gloom and doom prophecies do so as well.
John Holdren is President Obamas new Science Advisor. Holdren has spoken of
tinkering
<http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04
/08/obama-global-warming-plan_n_184657.html> with the Earths climate to
chill runaway global warming, and its being discussed in the White House as
a potential emergency option.
This man is talking about tinkering with the earths climate to chill
runaway global warming? Who are these people, anyway? This sounds like
Science Fiction Theater. Im a pretty simple guy, but even I can see the
potential for tremendous repercussions caused by such arrogance. And it
truly is arrogance on their part. I honestly believe the academics in this
administration, and heck theyre all academics, feel that were all a few
fries short of a Happy Meal (a special thanks goes out to soon to be
ex-Representative Alan Grayson, D-Fl. for this description, as according to
a Fox News reporter interviewing Grayson, claimed his own colleagues once
described him in this way). The problems we face today with these
academics is that they feel they alone, are capable of making the
decisions that impact our lives, good or bad. Theyre the power, and by that
statement, it is their right to rule us as they see fit. They lead, we
follow.
¬Ive read, that in the Obama administration, of the people hired or
appointed by the White House only 10 % had ever worked in private business.
Ten percent! They dont even know how to make a payroll, much less run
General Motors, plus take over health care? Weve got to wake up people.
¬I mean weve just seen example after example of people predicting global
cooling, then, global warming, and now weve got a science advisor telling
us of an option of his to fix the global warming problem. Does anyone in
our present administration even remotely consider the possibility that all
this warming and cooling must be a regular cycle the earth goes through??
Some years, even decades may be worse than others? I believe since the
earths inception its gone through four Ice Ages
but that too has been
determined by an academic.
Holdren goes on to explain that global warming is happening so rapidly is
the reason behind his tinkering with the environment theory.
One option raised by Holdren and a Nobel Prize winning scientist, Paul
Crutzen, includes shooting pollution particles, sulfur particles like those
produced by volcanoes, to mimic the effect of volcanoes in screening out the
incoming sunlight.
These people are in theory considering blocking out the suns rays to cool
the earth. They talk about it. Its discussed in the White House. These
people are dangerous, really. Holdren himself has said there could be grave
side effects. YOU RECKON??
One of the possible side effects theyve studied suggests the eating away of
a large portion of the ozone layer above the poles causing the Mediterranean
and the Mideast to become drier.
One thing that bothers other scientists is the side effects of such measures
that they dont anticipate. Quite frankly, and Im no scholar, it bothers me
as well, a lot! Honestly, who could possibly know for sure the chain of
events that might follow such theories if acted on
how about
God?
The amazing thing about all this global warming talk were being pounded
with is the fact they dont know, yet daily there is more and more
scientific findings that totally debunk their theories. This is all about
redistribution of wealth, is there ANY policy anymore which isnt?
As global levels of sea ice declined last year, many experts said this was
evidence of man-made global warming. Since September, however, the increase
in sea ice has been the fastest change, either up or down, since 1979, when
satellite record keeping began. According to the University of Illinois
Arctic Climate Research Center, global sea ice levels now equal those of
1979.
The above was taken from The New York Post article by George Will, on
February 28, 2009 titled Warming: A Panic Whose Time Has Passed.
So, now you can see why Im confused on the whole climate change issue. This
is not an inevitable event calling for immediate action by the Holdrens,
the Erhlichs, the Gores, or the Obamas to save our planet from immediate
destruction. Its just one other way to control people and their lives, as
well as redistributing OUR wealth, not theirs! If this were in fact about
redistributing their wealth, Im betting the urgency declared by our
progressive friends on this issue would suddenly become far less urgent.
At the climate talks in Cancun, Mexico, taking place from Nov. 29 until
Dec. 10th, host Mexico has focused on jump-starting the talks with an eye to
restoring faith in the multilateral system for tackling climate change. Is
it me, or do most of you feel Mexico just might have other more pressing
issues
like the murders of over ten thousand of its own citizens over the
past year by the cartels, many, many of whom were decapitated?
Then we have Bolivian President Evo Morales fingering, what else, capitalism
as the root of many of the problems facing the world, starting to sound
pretty familiar now isnt it?
The main problems I see that capitalism presents, is that it absolutely
torments our socialist, dang it, I mean progressive friends, and the reasons
of which are very simple. It provides a countrys citizens, through the
workplace, to better the quality of life for themselves and their families.
It provides us with the opportunity to elect our leaders through a
legitimate voting process. Most importantly though, it provides the
population to have the right to bear and keep arms, and it presents the
opportunity of the liberties and freedoms enjoyed by democracies such as
ours, to be able to state loudly and clearly, STICK-IT, in regards to bad
policy pushed by our politicians.
I dont imagine the people of say, North Korea tell ole Kim Jong that very
often, do you? I also doubt ole Kim loses much sleep frettin over global
warming either! There ya go again, it aint warmin, dang-it, its coolin
.No
It Aint!...
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
