<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/author/doctorbulldog/> 


 
<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2010/12/07/obama-gets-wee-weed-up-disses
-everyone-at-recent-presser/> Obama Gets 'Wee-Weed-Up' - Disses Everyone at
Recent Presser 


 <http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/author/doctorbulldog/> doctorbulldog |
7 December, 2010 at 3:11 pm | Categories:
<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?category_name=obama-sucks> Obama Sucks,
<http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/?category_name=politics> politics | URL:
<http://wp.me/p1NPg-6LV> http://wp.me/p1NPg-6LV 

It's one thing for Obama to go after the Right, but to also go after his
core group of Lefturd sycophants?  That's either extremely childish, insane,
or just plain stupid---I'm thinking all of the above...

A Prickly POTUS 'Itching for a Fight' - with Liberals and Conservatives
December 7, 2010
By Daniel Foster -
<http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/254730/prickly-potus-itching-fight-mda
sh-later-daniel-foster> NRO

In perhaps his touchiest press conference yet, President Obama reiterated
his opposition for the extension of current tax rates on top-earners, while
defending a deal he brokered with Republicans that would do do just that.

A prickly Obama, at times raising his voice, called Senate Republicans
"hostage-takers" and "bomb-throwers" for opposing his agenda, and said
critics on the Left who portray him as weak on core issues are
"sanctimonious."

Obama maintained that while he remains "as opposed to the high-income tax
cuts today as I was four years ago," he knows that he "can't win in the
Senate."

"I have not been able to budge [Republicans]," Obama said. "I haven't
persuaded Mitch McConnell and I haven't persuaded John Boehner."

"If this were just a matter of being able to persuade the American people to
my side, then I would just stick to my guns," he said, but added that "this
isn't an abstract debate. This is real money, for real people."

Obama had harsh words for the same congressional Republicans with whom he
brokered the tax deal, saying that cuts for the rich are the GOP's "holy
grail" and  "central economic doctrine." Echoing comments by Sen. Robert
Menendez (D., N.J.), Obama blamed Republicans were holding middle-class tax
cuts "hostage," and said it was "tempting not to negotiate with
hostage-takers."

But while he acknowledged the necessity of striking a bargain this time
around, he took pains to argue that the next two years will be different.

"For the last two years Republicans have had the benefit of watching us take
all these emergency actions.watching us preside over a $1.3 trillion deficit
we inherited..Well in the next two years they are going to have to show me
what they can do," he said.

"I will be happy to see the Republicans test whether I am itching for a
fight on a whole range of issues. I suspect they will find I am."

The martial language directed at the GOP notwithstanding, Obama reserved
perhaps his harshest criticism for critics on the professional Left. He
complained about the New York Times giving higher placement to the
administration's failures than its successes, and said "purists" on the Left
had set unattainable standards for success.

"This is the public option debate all over again," Obama said of leftward
criticism of the tax deal. "So I pass a signature piece of legislation. . .
something Democrats have been fighting for for a hundred years," but since
it lacked a "public option"  it was seen by liberals and progressives as "a
sign of weakness."

"If that is the standard. . . then let's face it, we will never get anything
done," Obama said. "Sanctimonious" progressives "will have the satisfaction
of having a purist position and no victories for the American people."

"That can't be the measure of what it means to be a Democrat. This is a big,
diverse country," Obama added, raising his voice. "Not everybody agrees with
us..The New York Times editorial page does not permeate across America."



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to