Can American Values Radicalize Muslims Both Here and Abroad? Posted By Raymond Ibrahim On February 10, 2011
Recent comments by U.S. officials on the threat posed by "radicalized" American Muslims are troubling, both for their domestic and international implications. Attorney General Eric Holder <http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20026288-503544.html> [1] states that "the threat has changed . to worrying about people in the United States, American citizens - raised here, born here, and who for whatever reason, have decided that they are going to become radicalized and take up arms against the nation in which they were born." The situation is critical enough to compel incoming head of the House Committee on Homeland Security Peter King <http://homeland.house.gov/press-release/newsday-king-whats-radicalizing-mus lim-americans> [2] to do all he can "to break down the wall of political correctness and drive the public debate on Islamic radicalization." To be sure, radicalized American Muslims pose a far greater risk than foreign radicals. For example, it is much easier for the former to get a job in the food industry and poison food <http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/21/al.qaeda.poison.plot/index.html?hpt=T1> [3] - a recently revealed al-Qaeda strategy. American terrorists are also better positioned to exploit the Western mindset. After describing Anwar al-Awlaki as one of the most dangerous terrorists alive, Holder added that he "is a person who - as an American citizen - is familiar with this country and he brings a dimension, because of that American familiarity, that others do not." (Likewise, American Adam Gadahn <http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm> [4] is al-Qaeda's chief propagandist in English no doubt due to his "American familiarity.") Sue Myrick <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8225586/US-home- grown-terrorists-a-global-threat-warns-congresswoman.html> [5], a member of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, wrote a particularly candid letter on "radicalization" to President Obama: For many years we lulled ourselves with the idea that radicalization was not happening inside the United Sates. We believed American Muslims were immune to radicalization because, unlike the European counterparts, they are socially and economically well-integrated into society. There had been warnings that these assumptions were false but we paid them no mind. Today there is no doubt that radicalization is taking place inside America. The strikingly accelerated rate of American Muslims arrested for involvement in terrorist activities since May 2009 makes this fact self-evident. Myrick named several American Muslims as examples of those who, while "embodying the American dream, at least socio-economically," still turned to radical Islam, astutely adding, "The truth is that if grievances were the sole cause of terrorism, we would see daily acts by Americans who have lost their jobs and homes in this economic downturn." Quite so. Yet, though Myrick's observations are limited to the domestic scene, they beg the following, even more critical, question: If American Muslims, who enjoy Western benefits - including democracy, liberty, prosperity, and freedom of expression - are still being radicalized, why then do we insist that the importation of those same Western benefits to the Muslim world will eliminate its even more indigenous or authentic form of "radicalization"? After all, the mainstream position, the only one evoked by politicians, maintains that all American sacrifices in the Muslim world (Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.) will pay off once Muslims discover how wonderful Western ways are, and happily slough off their Islamist veneer, which, as the theory goes, is a product of - you guessed it - a lack of democracy, liberty, prosperity, and freedom of expression. Yet here are American Muslims, immersed in the bounties of the West - and still do they turn to violent jihad. Why think their counterparts, who are born and raised in the Muslim world, where Islam permeates every aspect of life, will respond differently? In fact, far from eliminating radicalization, there is reason to believe that Western values can actually exacerbate Islamist tendencies. It is already known that Western concessions to Islam - in the guise of multiculturalism, "cultural sensitivity," political correctness, and self-censorship - only bring out the worst in Islamists. Yet even some of the most prized aspects of Western civilization - personal freedom, rule of law, human dignity-when articulated through an Islamist framework, have the capacity to "radicalize" Muslims. Consider: the West's unique stress on the law as supreme arbitrator in Islam becomes a stress to establish Islam's law - sharia, the supreme arbitrator of human affairs; the West's unwavering commitment to democracy in Islam becomes an unwavering commitment to theocracy, including an anxious impulse to resurrect the caliphate; Western notions of human dignity and pride, when articulated through an Islamist mindset (which sees fellow Muslims as the ultimate, if not only, representatives of humanity) induces rage when fellow Muslims - Palestinians, Afghanis, Iraqis, etc. - are seen under Western, infidel dominion; Western notions of autonomy and personal freedom have even helped "Westernize" the notion of jihad into an individual duty, though it has traditionally been held by sharia as a communal duty. Nor should any of this be surprising: a set of noble principles articulated through a fascistic paradigm can lead to abominations. In this case, the better qualities of Western civilization are being devoured, absorbed, and regurgitated into something equally potent, though from the other end of the spectrum. Put differently, just as a stress on human freedom, human dignity, and universal justice produces good humans, rearticulating these same concepts through an Islamist framework that qualifies them with the word "Muslim" - Muslim freedom, Muslim dignity, and Muslim justice - leads to what is being called "radicalization." _____ Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/can-american-values-radicalize-muslims-both-her e-and-abroad/ URLs in this post: [1] Eric Holder: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20026288-503544.html [2] Peter King: http://homeland.house.gov/press-release/newsday-king-whats-radicalizing-musl im-americans [3] poison food: http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/12/21/al.qaeda.poison.plot/index.html?hpt=T1 [4] Adam Gadahn: http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/gadahn_a.htm [5] Sue Myrick: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/8225586/US-home-g rown-terrorists-a-global-threat-warns-congresswoman.html [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
