Please   find below the full text of my latest   story for the Washington 
Times. I hope you find it interesting. It appears on A1 of   today's paper. You 
may link to it on the Web here:   
   
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/1/us-central-command-friending-the-enemy-in-psycholo/
   
   
   
You can find a complete archive of all my articles on my staff page,   here: 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/shaun-waterman/  

As ever, feedback is more than welcome and if you wish to   stop receiving 
these occasional alerts, just let me know by reply   e-mail.  

Sincerely  

Shaun Waterman
Reporter   
The Washington Times





    

U.S. Central Command ‘friending’ the enemy in psychological war -- Software 
helps crack terror cells
    
    By Shaun Waterman, The Washington Times
    
  The U.S. Central Command is stepping up psychological warfare operations   
using software that allows it to target social media websites used by   
terrorists.
    
  The Tampa, Fla.-based military command that runs the wars in Iraq and   
Afghanistan recently bought a special computer program that troops use   to 
create multiple fake identities on the Internet. The military uses   the 
fictitious identities to infiltrate groups and in some cases spread   
disinformation among extremist organizations such as al Qaeda and the   Taliban 
with the goal of disrupting their operations, according to   documents and U.S. 
officials.
    
  The program is aimed at helping troops create and maintain realistic   online 
personalities that will persuade extremists to allow them into   chat rooms and 
bulletin boards by creating the appearance that they are   logging on and 
posting messages or other contributions from anywhere in   the world.
    
  Information operations generally are carried out by U.S. special-operations 
forces.
    
  The software is used for what the military calls “information   operations” 
that use “classified social media activities outside the   United States to 
counter violent extremist ideology and enemy   propaganda,” Centcom spokesman 
Cmdr. Bill Speaks told The Washington   Times.
    
  Information operations include activities designed “to influence,   disrupt, 
corrupt or usurp adversarial human and automated   decision-making while 
protecting our own,” according to Pentagon   documents. Such activities include 
disinformation campaigns, or military   deception; computer network operations, 
or hacking; and what used to be   called psychological warfare operations or 
“psy-ops,” but is now   referred to as “military information support 
operations.”
    
  Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates issued a memo this year directing that   
military information support operations replace psychological warfare   and 
transferring oversight and management of information operations from   defense 
intelligence officials and to the Pentagon’s policymaking   directorate. He 
said the change would enable better coordination of   activities across the 
Pentagon and throughout the U.S. government.
    
  Under Mr. Gates‘ order, U.S. Strategic Command, where the military’s new   
cyberwarfare arm is based, will concentrate on military computer   hacking and 
cyberdefenses. The Joint Staffs will take responsibility for   deception 
operations and Special Operations Command will take the lead   in military 
information support operations. Deception operations can be   strategic and 
tactical and can be aimed at supporting U.S. policies or   small-scale 
operations.
    
  Former CIA Director and retired Air ForceGen. Michael V. Hayden said in   an 
interview that information operations like those at Centcom, using   social 
media, are the cutting edge of U.S. military and intelligence   activities that 
often require officials to rapidly determine how   long-established rules and 
limits apply in the borderless world of the   Internet.
    
  “I think a good word would be developmental,” Mr. Hayden said.   
“Operationally developmental, technologically developmental and legally   
developmental.”
    
  Centcom purchased the $2.7 million software from San Diego-based   Ntrepid, 
the same company that markets "Anonymizer," a popular online   tool that lets 
users hide their identities and locations on the Web.
    
  The company and its executives did not respond to several requests for 
comment.
    
  According to military procurement documents, the software will "enable   an 
operator to exercise a number of different online persons from the   same 
workstation and without fear of being discovered by sophisticated   
adversaries."
    
  "Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the 
world," the documents stated.
    
  Any computer that logs on to the Web generally does so from its unique   
Internet location, known as an Internet Protocol or IP address. The   addresses 
often can be tracked back to specific corporations or   agencies, and sometimes 
are pinpointed geographically.
    
  The software generates false IP addresses that are not linked to the   U.S. 
military, thus making them appear to originate from specified parts   of the 
world, the documents stated.
    
  "The service includes a user-friendly application environment to   maximize 
the user's situational awareness by displaying real-time local   information," 
the document said, a reference to information it can   generate about the time, 
weather and local news in the pretend location   of the fake persona.
    
  The growth of a single global information culture and the growing   ubiquity 
of the Internet pose challenges for U.S. military psy-ops   warriors who are 
barred by law and policy from targeting U.S. audiences.
    
  Traditional information operations such as leaflets can be dropped on   enemy 
troops, making it easy to exclude U.S. audiences. "Leaflets don't   blow across 
the world," said Isaac Porsche, a researcher at the Rand   Corp. who has 
written about information operations. "That's not the   case" with Internet 
communications, he added.
    
  "Cyberspace doesn't have borders," he said.
    
  The issue is further complicated by the most popular social media sites   
that are owned and operated by U.S. companies that enjoy many of the   same 
rights and protections as citizens under U.S. law.
    
  The social networking site Facebook, for example, says that any effort   to 
create false identities is a violation of the terms of service   agreement 
required of all users.
    
  "Facebook has always been based on a real-name culture," spokesman   Andrew 
Noyes said. "It's a violation of our policies to use a fake name   or operate 
under a false identity, and we encourage people to report   anyone they think 
is doing this."
    
  He said the company had a special team that reviews these reports and "takes 
action as necessary."
    
  Cmdr. Speaks said the Central Command program operates only on overseas 
social media sites.
    
  "We do not target U.S. audiences, and we do not conduct these activities on 
sites owned by U.S. companies," he said.
    
  But restrictions like these placed on information operations are   sometimes 
irksome to the troops carrying them out, Mr. Porsche said.
    
  "At the lowest echelon of the actual operators," he said, "there are   
complaints there that there's too many hoops they have to jump through.   ... 
In a firefight, if you're shot at, you return fire immediately. ...   The 
people who have to do the missions are always the ones who want to   move the 
fastest."
    
  But Mr. Porsche said the limitations on "returning fire" in information   
operations were necessary. "You can't just unleash an operation. It has   to be 
coordinated.
    
  "There are a lot of checks and balances," he said.
    
  John Delong, an official in charge of overseeing operations at the   National 
Security Agency, the electronic signals intelligence and   code-breaking 
agency, said he could not comment specifically on the   Centcom operation. But 
he said it was a challenge in these emerging and   dynamic areas to "play 
aggressively right up to the line" of what was   allowed under law and policy.
    
  "Sometimes people think of the rules as these things that are fixed on   
paper," he said. "They're constantly changing; they interact with each   other. 
There are constantly [new] interpretations coming down both   internally and 
externally."


          


The information contained in this electronic transmission is intended for the 
exclusive use of the 
individuals to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged and 
confidential, the disclosure of which is prohibited by law. If the reader of 
this transmission 
is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying 
of this communication is strictly prohibited. In addition, any unauthorized 
copying, disclosure or 
distribution of the material in this e-mail and any attachments is strictly 
forbidden.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to