http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/rangel-obama-did-not-have-constitutional

 

Rangel: Obama Needed Congressional Authorization for Military Intervention
in Libya 

Rangel says he would "like to believe" that members of Congress are looking
into whether or not the President's actions are an impeachable offense. 

Thursday, March 31, 2011 
By  <http://www.cnsnews.com/source/73101> Nicholas Ballasy 

(CNSNews.com) - Following a closed briefing for members of the House on the
U.S. military operation in Libya, Democrat Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) told
CNSNews.com that President Obama did not have the constitutional authority
to use military force in Libya without Congressional approval. Rangel added
that he would "like to believe" members of Congress are looking into whether
or not the President's action is an impeachable offense. 

"The Constitution is clear that when you say that their families back home
is going to make this ultimate sacrifice, then you have to have a vote,"
Rangel told CNSNews.com after attending a briefing with Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton; Defense Secretary Robert Gates; Director of National
Intelligence James Clapper; and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm.
Mike Mullen.

"As it is now, it's very difficult to know except what the president told us
as to what authority does he have except other Presidents have done the same
thing and I still think other Presidents are wrong for doing it."

When asked if the President's action is an impeachable offense, Rangel said
that Congress would have to make that decision. However, he added that he
would "like to believe" members of Congress will examine the issue.

"Well, you know if the Congress, if the House of Representatives are the
ones to determine whether or not it's an impeachable offense, there's a
vehicle for that set up in the Constitution which is much like a grand jury
and if they did find that it was impeachable then of course the trial would
be in the Senate and so there is a way before we do anything to try to find
out where there's facts that should be investigated. I don't think there's
enough there to do that because of the nation's concern," he said. 

"Once again, that's something I wasn't even thinking about until you raised
it. It is the Congress that feels the pulse of the nation and I would
suggest to you just as in a regular jury that if indeed there were technical
violations of the Constitution, it would be the Congress especially the
House that's elected every two years that would be able to vote the way they
think what America would want them to vote. So, again, it shows the genius
of the founders of the Constitution to have these checks and balances
without technically being bound but Presidents don't have the right to take
that broad flexibility from the Congress on their own unilaterally."

Rangel added, "I'd like to believe that lawyers, constitutionalists and
members of Congress are looking at that every day; every time there's a kid
that's been assigned to a war that has not been declared. I'd like to
believe that's being studied and looked into."

Rangel also said that Congress has to decide if it wants to "forfeit" its
Constitutional right to declare war.

 

 <http://www.cnsnews.com/image/charles-rangel-2> Charles Rangel

Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y. (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)

"We should try to clear this thing up. We cannot put this thing in rewind
and think that we can make any changes. Commitments have been made and no
matter whether the President is right or wrong when our country speaks, it
speaks and we have an obligation to have credibility in the international
community," he said. 

"But the truth of the matter is, we ought to really have a bipartisan
assembly of the Congress to find out, 'Does it really want to forfeit their
constitutional right and obligation to be involved whenever Americans are
going to be attacking other countries and involved in what can only be
described as war?'

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to