Gaza belongs to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan.

 

End of problem.

 

B


March 31, 2011 


A Single Question for Ban Ki-moon


Arlene Kushner

The question is why?

 

And it is posed in response to a statement made on behalf of the
secretary-general of the UN this week:

 

"A way must be found for Jerusalem to emerge as a capital of two states."


It is, of course, important to keep in mind that Ban Ki-moon represents one
of the most morally deficient of international agencies, an agency that is
blatantly and unabashedly anti-Israel. 

 

And yet... and yet... there is a perversity to Ban's logic - or absence
thereof - that is greatly troubling.

 

Every single resolution of the UN Security Council pertinent to the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict has said that the issues must be resolved via
negotiations between the parties.  And here comes the head of the UN, with a
statement that directly undermines that principle:  He is prepared to state
before the fact of final negotiations what the outcome "must" be.

 

And why "must" it be?  Apparently because he sees the formation of a
Palestinian state as a "moral" imperative, and the Palestinian Arabs have
said they will not accept any state that does not have Jerusalem as its
capital.  (Please note, even though the pretense is that they want to divide
Jerusalem and are seeking only eastern Jerusalem as their capital, in most
instances they call for Jerusalem to be their capital.)    

 

That's it, then? The Arabs say they want Jerusalem, and so the Jews must
give it to them, or the eastern portion at any rate.

 

In insisting that this must be the case, Ban is ignoring a host of factors,
including historical context and the several rights of the Jewish people.

 

When the Palestinian Arabs demand "East" Jerusalem, they are actually
referring to the portion of Jerusalem that is beyond what is known as the
Green Line.  "East" Jerusalem runs east, north and south of "West"
Jerusalem.

 

The suggested apportionment of the city predicated on this "East-West"
division perpetuates a myth: the ubiquitously promulgated fiction that there
was something sacrosanct about the Green Line.

 

In point of fact, however, it was nothing more than a temporary armistice
line-a ceasefire line, agreed upon by Israel and Jordan as part of the
armistice agreement signed in 1949 at the end of the War of Independence.
This was the war initiated by the Arab League immediately following Israel's
establishment, in an attempt to destroy the new state.  

 

The armistice agreement itself specified that the armistice line would not
prejudice future negotiations on a permanent border.  And yet, a good
portion of the world today believes that this Green Line was once the "true"
eastern border of Israel. 

 

What is more, the corollary fiction has been spun that Palestinian Arabs
were on the eastern side of that Green Line, so that giving eastern
Jerusalem to them now to serve as their capital is merely justice - it's a
question of giving them back what they had.  

 

There's a small problem with this however: They never had it.  There was no
Palestinian administrative authority then.  On the eastern side of the Green
Line, Jordan was in charge.  This is the Jordan that rendered eastern
Jerusalem Judenrein, thereby creating an "Arab" part of the city.

 

In 1967, Israel liberated eastern Jerusalem and again had access to her holy
places.  In July 1980, the Knesset passed the Jerusalem Law, declaring,
"Jerusalem, complete and united, is the capital of Israel." Eastern
Jerusalem is indivisibly part of the capital, and the Jewish population of
eastern Jerusalem today constitutes almost half of the population of that
part of the city.

 

As to Jewish rights, there is a great deal that merits mention:

 

*       Jerusalem in 3,000 years has never been the capital for any people
other than the Jews.
*       In the course of those 3,000 years, it has been divided only once,
during the 19 years when Jordan held eastern Jerusalem.
*       Over the millennia, Jews have consistently maintained a presence in
Jerusalem, and have been the majority in the city, in modern times, since
the mid-1800s.
*       The Jewish connection to Jerusalem is unique: Jews worldwide face
Jerusalem when praying, and remember the city in their prayers on a daily
basis.
*       The heart of Jewish heritage, including the Temple Mount, is in the
older, eastern part of Jerusalem, the very part that is envisioned as a
Palestinian capital.

 

To this we can add the fact that the Jewish right to Jerusalem was set in
international law with the Mandate for Palestine established unanimously by
the League of Nations in 1922; it granted Palestine (which includes
Jerusalem) to the Jews for establishment of a homeland.

 

How much of this does Ban Ki-moon know?  This writer's guess would be, not a
great deal. 

 

Would it change matters if he were told?  

 

It is highly unlikely.  Especially if he were seeking to fulfill a role as
unofficial spokesperson for the Palestinian Authority.  In that instance,
there would be little point in letting facts get in the way.


Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/a_single_question_for_ban_kimo.h
tml at April 03, 2011 - 04:21:07 PM CDT 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to