http://www.guampdn.com/article/20110403/NEWS01/104030321 


Guam in reach of Chinese missiles


6:00 AM, Apr. 3, 2011  |  


Written by


Paul C. Barton 
Gannett Washington Bureau 


TO THE POINT

.An American war strategist says Guam is not immune to missile attacks from
China.

WASHINGTON -- Advancements in Chinese military capabilities mean Guam has
lost its status as a safe haven for American forces in the Western Pacific,
a top war strategist says.

"We are no longer out of reach," Thomas Mahnken, professor at the U.S. Naval
War College in Rhode Island, said in an interview with the Gannett
Washington Bureau.

That's especially the case, he said, in regard to Chinese ballistic missiles
that could rain down on U.S. airfields and other facilities on the island.

"They have put a lot of resources into missile programs," Mahnken said.

While the United States has been tied down for the past decade in
Afghanistan and the Middle East, he said, the Chinese have been making rapid
progress on a range of military technologies.

"They have exploited that," Mahnken said.

Besides conventionally armed ballistic missiles, developments in Chinese
armaments include sea-launched missiles, both nuclear and conventionally
armed; nuclear and diesel submarines; cruise missiles; intercontinental
ballistic weapons; better combat aircraft and bombers; and anti-satellite
weapons. And cyberwarfare, he said, has not been neglected.

Mahnken said the U.S. military retains clear superiority, but "in some cases
our advantage is slipping." Earlier this month, Mahnken delivered similar
warnings to the House Armed Services Committee and U.S. Delegate Madeleine
Bordallo.

"This is a matter of some urgency since China is, for the first time, close
to achieving a military capability to deny U.S. and allied forces access to
much of the Western Pacific rim," he told the committee.

"The assumption that U.S. bases in Guam, Japan and elsewhere will be secure
from attack is in question. The (Chinese military) is fielding ballistic and
cruise missile systems and a number of other capabilities designed to
destroy most key facilities," Mahnken also testified.

Despite Mahnken's testimony, Bordallo said in a statement Wednesday: "There
is no specific threat from China against U.S. interests in Guam. The
reposturing of U.S. military forces in the Pacific seeks to realign our
forces to better respond to a variety of threats or humanitarian crises in
the region. Moreover, our military maintains a variety of assets that can
counter a wide range of weapons that any country may possess, and this was a
point made by U.S. Pacific Command in testimony before our committee."

She added: "Although I share the concerns that have been voiced regarding
China's level of investment in its military, greater transparency by the
Chinese government will go a long way in addressing these concerns. I am
also confident that the U.S.-China relationship will continue to improve
through greater interaction between our military officials as well as
greater economic opportunities between our countries."

Since World War II, the United States has relied on a system of forward
bases to deter adversaries and reassure allies, Mahnken said.

In that light, Guam has frequently been called "the tip of the spear."

Now in doubt, he told lawmakers, is the notion that on Guam or anywhere else
in the Western Pacific, the U.S. will "enjoy an operational sanctuary in
space."

Assumptions that U.S. naval vessels "can operate with impunity in all parts
of the Western Pacific is questionable" as well, he told the committee.

A central question is whether the Chinese would regard Guam as a "red line"
that they dare not cross because of the threat of U.S. retaliation. Related
to that is whether Middle America cares enough about Guam to support going
to war to defend it, Mahnken said in the interview.

A conflict over Taiwan, Mahken said, would likely bring Guam into play for
both sides.

The Chinese, he testified, are working night and day to develop "programs to
degrade or destroy the U.S. command, control and communications abilities,
as well as American intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and the
navigational systems that are critical for U.S. military operations."

American forces would hardly be defenseless, he said, but the Chinese are
clearly working to develop military power that compliments their status as
an economic superpower.

In sum, he told lawmakers, "Chinese military modernization threatens to
reshape the balance of power in Asia."

In response to China's enhancement of its forces, Mahnken testified, the
United States should bolster its intelligence, surveillance and
reconnaissance networks in the Pacific; harden and diversify its Pacific
bases, especially Guam; and bolster the submarine forces of allies and
develop better ways to better link with them.

 <http://www.guampdn.com/article/20110403/NEWS01/104030321> 


 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to