<http://www.nytimes.com/> clip_image001

April 5, 2011

Under Heavy Assault, Libyan Rebels Flee Brega

By  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/c_j_chivers/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
 C. J. CHIVERS and  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/david_d_kirkpatrick/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
 DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

BREGA, Libya — Forces loyal to Col.  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/q/muammar_el_qaddafi/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
 Muammar el-Qaddafi battered rebel fighters on the road outside this strategic  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/energy-environment/oil-petroleum-and-gasoline/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>
 oil town on Tuesday with rocket fire, mortars and artillery, driving them many 
miles to the north and leaving them in disarray 

A day after a senior Libyan rebel leader had criticized  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/north_atlantic_treaty_organization/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
 NATO for “a delay in reacting and lack of response to what’s going on on the 
ground,” there was still no sign of the air power that two weeks ago seemed to 
have the loyalist forces reeling toward the Qaddafi stronghold of Surt, more 
than 100 miles to the west. 

The official, Ali al-Essawi, the foreign policy director of the Transitional 
National Council, the rebels’ coordinating group, said that the problems began 
after NATO took charge of the air campaign from the United States, Britain and 
France, and that he now foresaw a drawn-out battle. “They took the command; 
they will make it long,” he said in an interview in Rome. 

While NATO seemingly had no presence on the battlefield here, a NATO official, 
Brig. Gen. Mark van Uhm, said at a news briefing that Western airstrikes had 
destroyed about 30 percent of Colonel Qaddafi’s military power, Reuters 
reported. 

In a lone bright spot for the rebel government, a tanker capable of carrying a 
million barrels of oil was headed to a port near the city of Tobruk near the 
Egyptian border, The Associated Press reported. With oil prices pushing past 
$100 a barrel, the cargo could exceed $100 million in value. 

Libyan government officials continued to talk about a negotiated solution to 
the crisis in which the country would “transition” to democratic rule while 
ultimate power remained with Colonel Qaddafi or his sons. To do otherwise, said 
Musa Ibrahim, the government spokesman, was to risk a “dangerous” power vacuum 
along the lines of Iraq after the fall of  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/h/saddam_hussein/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
 Saddam Hussein. 

In an interview with the  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/british_broadcasting_corporation/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
 BBC broadcast on Tuesday,  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/q/seif_alislam_el_qaddafi/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
 Seif al-Islam el-Qaddafi appeared to spell out his proposal for a transition 
to democracy, suggesting that his father assume a primarily ceremonial role, 
“like the Queen of England.” 

He argued that international pressure could never force his father from power 
because, he said, “the Libyan people will never allow it.” Instead, he argued 
that talks about  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html?inline=nyt-geo>
 Libya’s future should focus on allowing the Libyan people to govern themselves 
through elections of a new government, including a new prime minister. 

Both rebel and Western leaders have ruled out any negotiated settlement that 
would leave Colonel Qaddafi or his sons in power, however, and that scenario 
became even more remote on Tuesday when the prosecutor for the  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/i/international_criminal_court/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
 International Criminal Court said that the shootings of protesters in the 
early days of the uprising in Libya was deliberate. 

“We have evidence that after the Tunisia and Egypt conflicts, people in the 
regime were planning how to control demonstrations in Libya,” the prosecutor, 
Luis Moreno-Ocampo, told Reuters. “The shootings of civilians was a 
predetermined plan.” 

The rebels had seemed to be gaining ground in Brega on Monday, taking a 
residential quarter of the town and mounting an attack in the evening against 
loyalists at a university campus and oil infrastructure. But they were beaten 
back by ferocious heavy machine-gun fire and a single artillery or mortar 
barrage. 

The loyalists’ firepower, coordinated and accurate, killed at least several 
rebel fighters and wounded many more, and sent others scrambling north in 
retreat. But it was intermittent, an apparent sign that ammunition stocks were 
low. 

That changed on Tuesday, as the artillery fire came often and with deadly 
accuracy, turning the road from Brega into an extremely dangerous corridor 
where the hot steel shrapnel of an exploding shell could rip through a vehicle 
or rebel position at any time. In those circumstances, the ragtag rebel forces 
chose to withdraw to a safe distance. 

Throughout Monday and Tuesday, little or no air power was visible overhead. A 
Pentagon spokesman, Capt. Darryn James, said that American air power had played 
a smaller role in the war since Sunday, and that with command and control of 
the air campaign officially shifted to NATO, by midnight on Monday in 
Washington the United States had no strike sorties planned. 

American aircraft, Captain James said, would now be on a so-called standby mode 
and would fly only when requested by NATO and approved by the Pentagon. The 
withdrawal of American assets means, among other things, that the rebels will 
have less support from two classes of aircraft that made several successful 
attacks against the Qaddafi forces in eastern Libya — the AC-130 gunship and 
A-10 — than when the loyalist forces were turned back just short of Benghazi, 
the rebel capital, two weeks ago. 

The quiet in the eastern skies on Monday seemed to underscore Mr. Essawi’s 
sentiment that the international military campaign, after initially turning 
back Colonel Qaddafi’s army and militias as they swept eastern Libya, had lost 
momentum, leaving adrift the ground war, waged by rebels with virtually no 
military experience or structure. 

A sustained campaign could be especially hard on civilians in Misurata, a city 
in the west in which rebels have been battling the Qaddafi forces in a long 
siege. Rebels said Tuesday that they were still under heavy shelling from 
mortars and artillery. Aiman, a doctor whose last name was withheld for the 
protection of his family, said that two people were killed Tuesday — a 
10-year-old child and a member of the hospital staff — and a total of seven by 
the end of the day on Monday. 

Any long-lasting campaign raises questions as well about the prospects for 
rebel success in the east, where a small, ill-trained rebel column had been 
stalled for days along the two-lane highway to Brega. 

Early on Monday, the forces loyal to Colonel Qaddafi, which had been patrolling 
one of the town’s residential areas, known as New Brega, slipped away, allowing 
rebel forces to advance. The rebels who were strung north along the highway 
urged anyone with a car or pickup truck to rush into the neighborhood and 
retrieve civilians. For a few hours, civilians streamed out of the area, which 
by evening became a ghost town. 

But residents interviewed in New Brega said that the Qaddafi forces had never 
viewed New Brega as a priority. They had swept it from house to house, looking 
for weapons and rebel fighters, but had not dug in and occupied the area. The 
main body of the Qaddafi forces, they said, were in defensive positions at the 
university and near the oil infrastructure. 

Rebels fired ground-to-ground rockets at the suspected loyalist positions for 
hours. Smoke rose from the city, and at one point a rocket seemed to ignite a 
much larger explosion, sending a mushroom cloud billowing over the desert. 

Late in the afternoon, the rebels tried to advance down the road to the 
university, but were met by withering machine-gun fire. And when many of the 
rebels began to pull back with their wounded and their dead, the loyalists 
shelled the nearest rebel checkpoint with an artillery or heavy mortar barrage, 
wounding at least six rebel fighters and setting off a panicked withdrawal that 
did not stop for several miles. 

The fighting fit into a recent pattern of inconclusive skirmishes, as the 
seesaw battle up and down the Mediterranean coast has seemed to settle into a 
stalemate. 

In another development on Monday, Italy and Kuwait joined France and Qatar in 
recognizing the Transitional National Council as the legitimate government of 
Libya. “We have decided to recognize the council as the only political, 
legitimate interlocutor to represent Libya,” said Foreign Minister Franco 
Frattini of Italy, which plans to send an envoy to Benghazi within days. 

That followed a proposed resolution to the Libyan conflict from at least two of 
Colonel Qaddafi’s sons. Under their plan, Colonel Qaddafi would step aside to 
make way for a transition to a constitutional democracy under the direction of 
his son Seif al-Islam, according to a diplomat and a Libyan official briefed on 
the plan. 

The rebels, as well as the American and European nations supporting them, have 
so far insisted on a more radical break with Colonel Qaddafi’s rule of nearly 
40 years. Mr. Essawi said the proposal was unacceptable. “There’s no way to 
replace Qaddafi with a small Qaddafi,” he said in an interview. 

But a diplomat familiar with the proposal said that discussions were still in 
the initial stages, and that “the bargaining has yet to commence.” 

Noting that the  
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_nations/index.html?inline=nyt-org>
 United Nations resolution authorizing the airstrikes also precludes “a foreign 
occupation force of any form” in Libya, the diplomat said he wondered how the 
fighting could end without a negotiated solution. 

Proposals and counterproposals even for a cease-fire appeared deadlocked thus 
far. “For Qaddafi, a cease-fire means everyone should cease firing, but the 
Qaddafi forces should stay where they are,” the diplomat said. “But for the 
rebels, it means that the Qaddafi forces should withdraw.” 

“They will continue until the ammunition is finished, this stupid fighting 
along the highway,” the diplomat said. 

C. J. Chivers reported from Brega, and David D. Kirkpatrick from Tripoli, 
Libya. Rachel Donadio contributed reporting from Rome, and Thom Shanker from 
Washington.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to