Diversity Perversity
by Walter E. Williams

The terms affirmative action, equal representation, preferential treatment
and quotas just don't sell well. The intellectual elite and their media,
government and corporate enthusiasts have come up with diversity, a
seemingly benign term that's a cover for racially discriminatory policy.
They call for college campuses, corporate offices and government agencies to
"look like America." 

Part of looking like America means if blacks are 13 percent of the
population, they should be 13 percent of college students and professors,
corporate managers and government employees. Behind this vision of justice
is the silly notion that but for the fact of discrimination, we'd be
distributed equally by race across incomes, education, occupations and other
outcomes. There is absolutely no evidence that statistical proportionality
is the norm anywhere on Earth; however, much of our thinking, laws and
public policy is based upon proportionality being the norm. Let's look at
some racial differences whilst thinking about their causes and possible
remedies.

While 13 percent of our population, blacks are 80 percent of professional
basketball players and 65 percent of professional football players and are
the highest paid players in both sports. By contrast, blacks are only 2
percent of NHL's professional ice hockey players. There is no racial
diversity in basketball, football and ice hockey. They come nowhere close to
"looking like America." 

Even in terms of sports achievement, racial diversity is absent. Four out of
the five highest career home-run hitters were black. Since blacks entered
the major leagues, of the eight times more than 100 bases were stolen in a
season, all were by blacks.

The U.S. Department of Justice recently ordered Dayton, Ohio's police
department to lower its written exam passing scores so as to have more
blacks on its police force. What should Attorney General Eric Holder do
about the lack of diversity in sports? Why don't the intellectual elite
protest? Could it be that the owners of these multi-billion-dollar
professional basketball, football and baseball teams are pro-black while
those of the NHL and major industries are racists unwilling to put blacks in
highly paid positions?

There's one ethnic diversity issue completely swept under the rug. Jewish
Americans are less than 3 percent of our population and only two-tenths of 1
percent of the world's population. Yet between 1901 and 2010, Jews were 35
percent of American Nobel Laureate winners and 22 percent of the world's.

If the diversity gang sees underrepresentation as "probative" of racial
discrimination, what do they propose we do about overrepresentation? Because
if one race is overrepresented, it might mean they're taking away what
rightfully belongs to another race.

There are other representation issues to which we might give some attention
with an eye to corrective public policy. Asians routinely get the highest
scores on the math portion of the SAT while blacks get the lowest. Men are
50 percent of the population and so are women; yet men are struck by
lightning six times as often as women. The population statistics for South
Dakota, Iowa, Maine, Montana and Vermont show that not even 1 percent of
their populations is black. On the other hand, in states such as Georgia,
Alabama and Mississippi, blacks are overrepresented in terms of their
percentages in the general population. 

There are many international examples of disproportionality. For example,
during the 1960s, the Chinese minority in Malaysia received more university
degrees than the Malay majority - including 400 engineering degrees compared
with four for the Malays, even though Malays dominate the country
politically. In Brazil's state of Sao Paulo, more than two-thirds of the
potatoes and 90 percent of the tomatoes produced were produced by people of
Japanese ancestry.

The bottom line is there no evidence anywhere that but for discrimination,
people would be divided according to their percentages in the population in
any activity. Diversity is an elitist term used to give respectability to
acts and policy that would otherwise be deemed as racism.


http://www.lewrockwell.com/williams-w/w-williams77.1.html 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to