Clearly liberals, leftists and progressives…like muslims…tend towards criminality.
B "Prior to the election, Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus was <http://www.jsonline.com/news/waukesha/100595954.html> heavily criticized for her decision to keep the county results on an antiquated personal computer, rather than upgrade to a new data system being utilized statewide. Nickolaus cited security concerns for keeping the data herself — yet when she reported the data, it did not include the City of Brookfield, whose residents cast nearly 14,000 votes." Does nobody ever think it odd each time there is an error, discrepancy or lost ballot found it always favors the liberal. What does it take before it becomes impossible to ignore the fact there is a pattern here and how long will it go on before something will be done to stop vote fraud. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/264209/breaking-computer-error-could-give-prosser-7381-more-votes-victory-christian-schneider <http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/264209/breaking-computer-error-could-give-prosser-7381-more-votes-victory-christian-schneider> BREAKING: Computer Error Could Give Prosser 7,381 More Votes, Victory <http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/264209/breaking-computer-error-could-give-prosser-7381-more-votes-victory-christian-schneider> April 7, 2011 5:29 P.M. By <http://www.nationalreview.com/author/253420> Christian Schneider After Tuesday night’s Wisconsin Supreme Court election, a computer error in heavily Republican Waukesha County failed to send election results for the entire City of Brookfield to the Associated Press. The error, revealed today, would give incumbent Supreme Court Justice David Prosser a net 7,381 votes against his challenger, attorney Joanne Kloppenburg. On Wednesday, Kloppenburg declared victory after the AP reported she finished the election with a 204-vote <http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/264209/breaking-computer-error-could-give-prosser-7381-more-votes-victory-christian-schneider> lead, out of nearly 1.5 million votes cast. On election night, AP results showed a turnout of 110,000 voters in Waukesha County — well short of the 180,000 voters that turned out last November, and 42 percent of the county’s total turnout. By comparison, nearly 90 percent of Dane County voters who cast a ballot in November turned out to vote for Kloppenburg. Prior to the election, Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus was <http://www.jsonline.com/news/waukesha/100595954.html> heavily criticized for her decision to keep the county results on an antiquated personal computer, rather than upgrade to a new data system being utilized statewide. Nickolaus cited security concerns for keeping the data herself — yet when she reported the data, it did not include the City of Brookfield, whose residents cast nearly 14,000 votes. Throughout the day Thursday, official canvass numbers flipped the lead back and forth between Prosser and Kloppenburg. While many believed a recount was inevitable, the addition of the Brookfield votes for Prosser could push the justice’s lead beyond the legal threshold that would trigger an automatic recount. Under state law, Kloppenburg could still ask for a recount up to three days after the official canvass, but would have to pay for it herself. “Waukesha County officials have announced a press conference for 5:30 CST.” More details as they become available. http://hudson-wi.patch.com/articles/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-results-may-be-impacted-by-additional-votes-found-in-waukesha-county Wisconsin Supreme Court Election Results May Be Impacted by Votes Found in Waukesha County The found votes could affect the Wisconsin Supreme Court election between David Prosser and Joanne Kloppenburg. By <http://hudson-wi.patch.com/users/joe-petrie> Joe Petrie and <http://hudson-wi.patch.com/users/lisa-sink-2> Lisa Sink | <http://hudson-wi.patch.com/articles/wisconsin-supreme-court-election-results-may-be-impacted-by-additional-votes-found-in-waukesha-county> Email the authors | 4:09pm <http://o3.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/PATCH/resize/273x203/http:/hss-prod.hss.aol.com/hss/storage/patch/c1001d64e81d88a71720c2f027735ba9> Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus talks to the clerk's office during the Board of Canvassing on Thursday. Joe Petrie Photos (1) An additional 200 votes in the razor-thin state Supreme Court race have been found in New Berlin's Ward 12 in New Berlin, according to Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickloaus. The additional ballots were found during the county's canvass of Tuesday's election results. The canvass board completed its two-day review on Thursday. Several discrepancies have been found in the results, which the board has worked to correct. Nickolaus is expected to announce the new results at the press conference. Observers have been on hand for the past two days to monitor the canvass for the hotly contested Wisconsin Supreme Court race between incumbent Justice David Prosser and challenger Assistant Attorney General JoAnne Kloppenburg. Unofficial results had Kloppenburg winning by 244 votes and the canvass must take place before a statewide recount can begin. In Brookfield, one woman expressed concern that her vote was not counted by the machine after she initially marked her ballot with a red pen she found in the polling station, according to the city clerk's office. City Clerk Kristine Schmidt said, however, she believes the vote was counted because the machine otherwise would have kicked the ballot back out with an error message. The woman came to City Hall Thursday to report concerns about her vote Tuesday at the Dixon Elementary School polling site. According to Schmidt: The woman said she used a red pen she found at the voting station but then stopped and asked poll workers if red would register. They told her to switch to a black pen and write with black over the red marks. The machine accepted the ballot, but the woman said she did not hear the usual beep that sounds after the ballot enters the machine. Schmidt said the site might have been too noisy to hear the beep. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
