<http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/04/blog-dallas-officials-read y-to.html> Blog: Dallas officials ready to move forward on Holy Land Foundation follow-up investigation were stymied by DOJ political appointees
<http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/authors.html#Jason%20Trahan/Reporter> By Jason Trahan/Reporter <http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/authors.html#Jason%20Trahan/Reporter> <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] | <http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/authors.html#Jason%20Trahan/Reporter> Bio http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/04/blog-dallas-officials-ready -to.html 11:58 AM on Thu., Apr. 14, 2011 | <http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2011/04/blog-dallas-officials-read y-to.html> Permalink Patrick Poole has <http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/did-obama-and-holder-scuttle-terror-finance-pr osecutions/> an interesting item on Pajamas Media's site today that is getting some attention. He quotes an unnamed <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/U.S._Department_of_Justice> Justice Department official who purports to describe how, last year, the U.S. attorney's office in Dallas was ready to indict a founding member of the <http://www.cair.com/> Council on American-Islamic Relations , among others, as a follow-up to the Holy Land Foundation terrorism financing case. However, Poole's source contends, those plans were scuttled by some of <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Barack_Obama> President Obama's DOJ political appointees. CAIR's national spokesman, <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Ibrahim_Hooper> Ibrahim Hooper, told me today in an email that the group isn't commenting on Poole's report. I've also put in calls to local authorities to get their reaction; I'll update as need be. A little background: CAIR was named as an unindicted coconspirator in the Holy Land case and <http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/10/fbi-cair-is-a-front-group- and.html> labeled a front for Hamas during FBI testimony in Dallas. (A federal judge subsequently ruled that that <http://www.dallasnews.com/news/local-news/20101106-Judge-ruled-prosecutors- should-not-have-6808.ece> CAIR's unindicted coconspirator status should never have been made public, by the way. But that same judge found "ample evidence" linking it to Holy Land.) CAIR, which bills itself as the country's largest Muslim civil rights organization, <http://www.cair.com/AmericanMuslims/AntiTerrorism.aspx> has consistently denied accusations that it supports terrorism. Complicating matters, however, <http://www.dentonrc.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/101408dnmet holyland.3eb9c62.html> is the fact that a founding member of CAIR, Omar Ahmad, was an early cohort of Holy Land's organizers. Poole's report says that Ahmad was one of several people Dallas investigators had their sights set on before the plugged was pulled. According to Poole: ...A number of leaders of Islamic organizations ... were about to be indicted on terror finance support charges by the U.S. attorney's office in Dallas, which had been investigating the case for most of the past decade. But those indictments were scuttled last year at the direction of top-level political appointees within the Department of Justice (DOJ) -- and possibly even the <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/White_House> White House. Included in those indictments was at least one of the co-founders of CAIR, based on "Declination of Prosecution of Omar Ahmad," a March 31 DOJ legal memo from Assistant Attorney General David Kris to Acting Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler. A second DOJ official familiar with the investigation independently confirmed these details. Omar Ahmad is one of CAIR's co-founders and its chairman emeritus. He was personally named, along with CAIR itself, as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror finance trial in 2007 and 2008. During the trial <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation> FBI Agent Lara Burns testified that both Omar Ahmad and current CAIR executive director Nihad Awad were caught on FBI wiretaps attending a 1993 meeting of <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Hamas> Hamas leaders in <http://topics.dallasnews.com/topic/Philadelphia> Philadelphia. According to Poole's source, "the chief reason outlined in the DOJ memo declining to prosecute CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad was the issue of potential jury nullification." This is a reference to the first HLF trial, which ended in 2007 with a hung jury. A 2008 retrial resulted in across-the-board convictions for the HLF organizers. Poole continues: But, according to our DOJ source, possible jury nullification was hardly the primary issue in the DOJ's scuttling of the terror finance prosecutions. "This was a political decision from the get-go," the source said. "It was always the plan to initially go after the [Holy Land Foundation] leaders first and then go after the rest of the accomplices in a second round of prosecutions. From a purely legal point of view, the case was solid. Jim Jacks [the U.S. attorney in Dallas who prosecuted the Holy Land Foundation executives] and his team were ready to go. There's a mountain of evidence against all of these groups that was never introduced during the Holy Land trial and it is damning. We've got them on wiretaps. That's exactly why many of these leaders and groups were named unindicted co-conspirators in the first round of prosecutions. "But from a political perspective there was absolutely no way that they could move forward. That's why this decision came from the top down. These individuals who were going to be prosecuted are still the administration's interfaith allies. Not only would these Muslim groups and their friends in the media be screaming "Islamophobia" at the top of their lungs and that this is a war against Islam, but the administration would look like absolute fools. It's kind of hard to prosecute someone on material support for terrorism when you have pictures of them getting handed awards from DOJ and FBI leaders for their supposed counter-terror efforts. How would Holder explain that when we're carting off these prominent Islamic leaders in handcuffs for their role in a terror finance conspiracy we've been investigating for years? This is how bad the problem is. Why are we continuing to have anything to do with these groups knowing what we know?" "By closing down these prosecutions," the source added, "the evidence we've collected over the past decade that implicates most of the major Islamic organizations will never see the light of day. "The FBI still has boxes and boxes of stuff that has never even been translated -- just like what happened in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. But it's already been made public that they have copies of money transfers sent by NAIT [the North American Islamic Trust, which holds the property titles of many of the mosques in America -- Ed.] directly to known Hamas entities and Hamas leaders. Those came out during the [Holy Land Foundation] trial. But what if we won the case against NAIT and its leaders and the U.S. government finds itself the landlord to hundreds of mosques across the country? How well do you think that would that play in the Muslim community?" The actions by the DOJ to crush these prosecutions are just another schizophrenic episode in the U.S. government's ongoing relationship with Islamic organizations, especially CAIR. After CAIR was named unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land trial, the FBI was forced to cut ties with the group. In an April 2009 letter to Sen. Jon Kyl, FBI Assistant Director Richard Powers said that "the FBI does not view CAIR as an appropriate liaison partner." And a February 2010 letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich to four congressmen who inquired about the termination of the relationship between the FBI and CAIR -- just weeks before the DOJ officially ceased further prosecutions, including of CAIR co-founders -- elaborated on the evidence about CAIR that had emerged from the Holy Land trial. Yet, according to my DOJ source, CAIR leaders continue to be regularly received by top DOJ and FBI officials despite the official ban and these statements made to members of Congress. And just last November, a significant July 2009 memorandum order by Judge Jorge Solis, who supervised the initial Holy Land Foundation trial, was unsealed under direction of the Court of Appeals. It provides the court's reasons for refusing to remove CAIR and two other prominent Islamic groups, the Islamic Society of North America and NAIT, from the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the case. Judge Solis concluded that "the four pieces of evidence the government relies on, as discussed below, do create at least a prima facie case as to CAIR's involvement in a conspiracy to support Hamas" (p. 7), specifically naming Omar Ahmad's part in the conspiracy (p. 6) and adding later that "the Government has produced ample evidence to establish the associations of CAIR, ISNA and NAIT with HLF, the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) and with Hamas" (p. 15). As I reported here at Pajamas Media, FBI Director Robert Mueller reiterated these reasons for cutting ties with CAIR before a recent House Judiciary Committee meeting -- just two days before The Daily Caller reported that White House officials had publicly praised CAIR. Adding to the hypocrisy, after the Obama administration scuttled the next round of prosecutions in the Hamas terror financing investigation last March, Attorney General Eric Holder gave the prosecutors and FBI investigators in the Holy Land Foundation case the AG's Award for Distinguished Service last October for their work in the case. I asked my DOJ source why they decided to come forward now. The source said: "This is a national security issue. We know that these Muslim leaders and groups are continuing to raise money for Hamas and other terrorist organizations. Ten years ago we shut down the Holy Land Foundation. It was the right thing to do. Then the money started going to KindHearts. We shut them down too. Now the money is going through groups like Islamic Relief and Viva Palestina. Until we act decisively to cut off the financial pipeline to these terrorist groups by putting more of these people in prison, they are going to continue to raise money that will go into the hands of killers. And until Congress starts grilling the people inside DOJ and the FBI who are giving these groups cover, that is not going to change. My biggest fear is that Americans are going to die and it will be the very Muslim leaders we are working with who will be directly or indirectly responsible." But if the U.S. government publicly acknowledges the terror ties of these groups why do they continue to deal with them? "We tried to do what we could during the Bush administration. After 9/11, we had to do something and [the Holy Land Foundation] was the biggest target. If the mistrial hadn't have happened, we probably would have gone through the second round of prosecutions before the change in administrations. "To say things are different under Obama and Holder would be an understatement. Many of the people I work with at Justice now see CAIR not just as political allies, but ideological allies. They believe they are fighting the same revolution. It's scary. And Congress and the American people need to know this is going on." It remains to be seen how Congress, the American people, and the establishment media -- who always seem eager to rise to the defense of CAIR and the other terror-tied Islamic groups -- will proceed. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
