Democrat New Tone: PA Politician Asks if She Can Kill a Colleague, ‘Blow His 
Brains Out’ 
<http://biggovernment.com/wthuston/2011/04/15/democrat-new-tone-pa-politician-asks-if-she-can-kill-a-colleague-blow-his-brains-out/>
 

by Warner Todd Huston  <http://biggovernment.com/author/wthuston> 

Yes, it’s that new age of Democrat political civility rearing its ugly head yet 
again. During an April 12 debate on gun control 
<http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/growls/Blow-His-Brains-Out.html>  
Pennsylvania State Representative Margo Davidson of Philadelphia wondered aloud 
on the House floor if it might be OK for her to blow the brains out of one of 
Pennsylvania’s Republican Representatives.

 <http://biggovernment.com/files/2011/04/yelling.JPG4.jpeg> 
http://biggovernment.com/files/2011/04/yelling.JPG4.jpeg

Before we even go on with this story, imagine if a white, male, and Republican 
politician had asked during a debate on policy if it would be OK if he blew the 
brains out of a black, female, Democrat. Just imagine what would be happening 
to such a man should he have done this. Certainly his name would be on the lips 
of every TV newscaster for at least a week after he said such an outrageous 
thing. Movements would be born to oust him from his elected position. 
Colleagues would be condemning him. Race-baiters would be flocking to the state 
for vigils. Further his own party would be denouncing him in no uncertain terms.

But what we have here is a black female, a Democrat from a big city, and no one 
is paying any attention at all. Obviously it is not a big deal. Apparently we 
are expected to just move on as if there is nothing wrong with a black woman 
expressing the desire to kill her political opponent.

Double standard is the nicest thing I can say about it.

Anyway, all that said, the debate was about the expansion of the Castle 
Doctrine in Pennsylvania, an expansion that would give more citizens the right 
to protect themselves from attack. Representative Davidson was attempting to 
make a point on how she felt the Castle Doctrine was a dangerous law and to 
illustrate her point she made reference to Representative Daryl Metcalfe (R, 
Butler County). Metcalfe is a strong Second Amendment supporter and one of the 
chamber’s conservative members.

In open debate, right on the floor of the House, Davidson said, “If the 
gentleman from Butler County stood yelling, knowing that he’s a gun-toter, and 
I felt threatened, would I be protected under court law if I blew his brains 
out.”

After this outrageous utterance, the Pilly Inquirer’s John Baer reports that 
Rep. Davidson was so pleased with herself she “giggled.”

Coming only a day after our president went on TV to tell the nation that 
Republicans that want to cut the gross overspending of Congress and balance the 
budget are guilty of trying to kill old people and how anyone making over 
$200,000 a year are selfish jerks I suppose having another Democrat politician 
saying that she wants to murder a Republican really is no big deal.

Democrats, it seems, are wholly exempt from civility.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to