Fondlers, Your Country Calls

by Becky Akers <mailto:[email protected]> 

Recently by Becky Akers: A Dearth of Depraved Dames
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/akers149.html> 

 


 

        

 

 

Ramesh Advani and Noel Alexandre Bertrand must be two flummoxed felons.

Both men allegedly assaulted passengers in aviation's gulag; both now endure
Leviathan's fury and might, with arrests and charges, trials and punishment
- "up to three years in prison
<http://news.travel.aol.com/2011/04/13/man-pleads-guilty-to-groping-sleeping
-passenger-on-plane/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl10%7Csec3_lnk2%7C55774>
and a $250,000 fine when he is sentenced in August," in Mr. Advani's case. 

And both must be asking, "Why?" Tens of thousands of sexual assaults occur
daily in airports
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/22/AR201011220
5514.html> , so frequently that they've become routine, with the culprits
not only admitting their crimes but actually bragging
<http://blog.tsa.gov/2010/11/tsa-myth-or-fact-leaked-images.html>  about
them. And repeating them dozens, perhaps hundreds
<http://blog.tsa.gov/2010/11/new-tsa-pat-down-procedures.html> , of times
per week. Outraged parents film
<http://travel.usatoday.com/flights/post/2011/04/tsa-screening-controversy/1
55793/1>  and photograph
<http://www.nwcn.com/home/?fId=119816969&fPath=/news/local&fDomain=10202>
pedophiles groping their children. Concerned citizens videotape other
victims <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsEa-xYv6PI&NR=1>  so shamed they
cannot even face the camera while they struggle to recover from the attack.
Indeed, the assailants themselves often snap explicit pictures of their
prey. <http://www.tsa.gov/approach/tech/ait/index.shtm> 

So the evidence against these serial perverts is graphic and overwhelming.
Yet far from arresting or punishing them, Leviathan rewards them: with
paychecks, "federal benefits
<http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=165&sid=2000678&pid=3> ," "X-ray
vision
<http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/14/tsa-advertising-job-openings-piz
za-boxes/> " so they can view all the pornography they please on company
time and our dime, "fist-bump[s]
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/25/us/politics/25pistole.html?_r=2&emc=eta1>
," and uniforms and badges calculated to awe the serfs.
<http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1815529,00.html> 

Context is all, it seems. Mr. Advani and Mr. Bertrand were not wearing cheap
polyester or tin jewelry when they struck. I was about to add that they
didn't confine their offenses to the Transportation Security
Administration's (TSA) notorious checkpoints, either - but then, neither do
the TSA's rapists. They have expanded the scene of their crimes to airlines
<http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/queens/flier_tsa_grope_nightmare_5EsDbrQ
Pc99DADfZNBjI4J> ' gates and even beyond airports to bus stations
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOv8Zh3OvSg> .

So aside from their clothing and the fact that neither man taped his
exploits, there's little that differentiates our two free-lancers' attacks
from those of the TSA's whores. Mr. Advani was aboard "an overnight flight
from Hong Kong
<http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/05/24/nj-man-charged-with-sexually-abu
sing-woman-on-newark-bound-flight/?mod=rss_WSJBlog&mod=WSJ_NY_NY_Blog>  to .
Newark, N.J." last May when he "reached under the blanket of a woman
sleeping next to him . and sexually abused her. Passengers sitting behind
the victim kicked her seat to alert her, prosecutors said." When the lady
"awoke, she became aware of the abuse and informed the flight crew." Which
ineluctably led to Mr. Advani's "detain[ment]" when the plane landed.

        

The War State Journal's readers are far more astute than its reporters and
editors, and they
<http://www.lewrockwell.com/akers/%E2%80%93%20in%20contrast%20to%20the%20TSA
%E2%80%99s%20clear-cut,%20publicly%20performed%20and%20witnessed%20assaults%
20on%20fully%20sentient%20victims%20who%20can%20and%20have%20loudly%20testif
ied%20to%20their%20abuse> 've pointed out several problems with this story.
How does a victim who slept through her abuse, so soundly that she would
have missed it but for a boisterous rousing, know it really happened? How
does she testify to it? And how exactly did the passengers behind her
discern it through a blanket and, as one reader puts it, "the small slit
<http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2010/05/24/nj-man-charged-with-sexually-abu
sing-woman-on-newark-bound-flight/tab/comments/>  in between the seats??
[sic]" And if they did, in fact, see what they think they saw, wouldn't they
have naturally assumed she was Mrs. Advani?

Contrast these murky circumstances with the TSA's clear-cut, horrifically
obvious assaults before scores of witnesses and cameras on fully sentient
people who can and have loudly testified in detail to the molestation
<http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/third-lawsuit-filed-over-tsa-airport-sc
reening> . And yet Mr. Advani, not his governmental counterparts, pled
guilty this week "to a count of sexual abusive contact
<http://news.travel.aol.com/2011/04/13/man-pleads-guilty-to-groping-sleeping
-passenger-on-plane/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl10%7Csec3_lnk2%7C55774> "
- though he doesn't seem to have ever once threatened Sleeping Beauty with a
fine "of up to $11,000 and possible arrest
<http://www.palmbeachpost.com/accent/travel/11-000-fine-arrest-possible-for-
some-who-1059926.html> " for resisting his advances.

Nor did Mr. Bertrand. This former Marine, 26
<http://news.travel.aol.com/2011/04/13/noel-alexander-bertrand-denver-airpor
t-rape-suspect-remains-in/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl10%7Csec3_lnk3%7C557
74> , met a 22-year-old
<http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27524001/detail.html?source=den>
woman in a restaurant at Denver International Airport, where she was
stranded overnight after missing her connecting flight (hmmm: do you suppose
the TSA had anything to do with that delay? Did it close down her airport of
departure because some lucky cuss managed to escape its pawing
<http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/27398/> ? Or did it hold her
flight at the gate so its goons could chastise a passenger who dared
question them at the checkpoint
<http://www.independent.org/blog/index.php?p=9337> ?). She says they chatted
over dinner; when she left to find a secluded area for some rest, he
"followed and sat next to her.
<http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27524001/detail.html?source=den> 

"The woman said [Mr. Bertrand] asked if he could kiss her . 'when I tell him
that's too forward, before I could finish my statement, he had already
pulled me in to kiss him.,' the woman said. . Suddenly, she said, the man
grabbed the strings of her hooded sweatshirt and pulled, lifting her off the
ground. The man then threw her on the floor, grabbing her head and pounding
it on the floor, said the woman, who had a large bruise above her left eye.
. 'He pulled my pants down and proceeded to assault me from behind.'"

You may be thinking, Hey, at least Our Rulers don't beat us to a pulp before
gate-raping us. Au contraire. In 2007, Robin Kassner, a New Yorker and
"marketing executive, says she
<http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local&id=6257417>  was
pulled out of the security line at Reagan National Airport when screeners
told her her contact lens solution didn't meet the liquid ban requirement.
As a TSA employee searched Kassner's bag, Washington D.C. airport police
arrived and appeared to motion to her to step away from the bag. She turns
her back . Two officers are seen [on tape from the airport's surveillance]
dragging Kassner away from her suitcase before they throw her to the ground.
. police lifted Kassner to her feet and shoved her into a nearby table. .
One man can be seen taking his elbow and slamming her head onto the table."

        

Even the TSA's "normal" fondling is harsh. "Before boarding a flight in
Grand Rapids <http://www.wzzm13.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=140233> , a
woman says the search at the security checkpoint was violent, unnecessary
and extremely upsetting. . [Ella] Swift says they told her she was singled
out because she was wearing a skirt. .'The female officer ran her hand up
the inside of my leg to my groin and she did it so hard and so rough she
lifted me off my heels,' she says. 'I think I yelped.  I was in pain for
about an hour afterwards.'" 

Other folks probably saw Ms. Swift's violation - yet no one, least of all
Ms. Swift, seems shocked that none of them came to her defense. Mr.
Bertrand's victim claims several of the airport's employees walked past
during the rape and implies that they should have rescued her. But can we
blame them for neglecting to do so? They probably figured the TSA was up to
its usual tricks, and we all know what happens to heroes who "interfere
<http://openjurist.org/title-49/us-code/section-46503/interference-with-secu
rity-screening-personnel> " with "security duties," now, don't we? "Finally
<http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27524001/detail.html?source=den> . two
airport workers outside the terminal saw the attack through a window and
intervened."

Just as the federal TSA insists that its checkpoints are safe, so this
municipally-owned airport <http://www.flydenver.com/>  insists its premises
are: "All airport employees
<http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27524001/detail.html?source=den>
complete a mandatory annual training on safety and security..." Does that
include instruction on how to differentiate official from unofficial sexual
assaults? "Employees are trained to be extra-vigilant and to report
suspicious activity..." Really? And how many reports have they filed on the
TSA's crimes?

" <http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/27524001/detail.html?source=den>
'It's very important that if you are traveling alone, . that you have the
security of the facility that you're in,' said the woman," who's obviously
never heard of Columbine High School: "'Especially if it's a government
facility like the Denver airport.'" 

Oh, the poor girl. That's precisely where the danger is greatest.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to