Were Conquered Christians Really Liberated Muslims? Posted By Raymond Ibrahim On April 23, 2011
The Wild Lies that Pass for 'Truth' in the Muslim World Imagine if a top American historian appeared on the MSM insisting that the only reason Europeans conquered the Americas was to "defend" the Native Americans-who somehow had adopted Christianity centuries before Jesus was born-from being persecuted by heathen tribes. While that would create a maelstrom of outrage and derision in the West, in the Arab world-where some think bewitched animals <http://www.raymondibrahim.com/8657/bewitched-animals-and-the-muslim-media> work as infidel operatives-such absurdities regularly pass for "truth." Copts: Muslims Before Muhammad Consider the case of Fadel Soliman <http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1510> , a celebrated Sharia expert and Arab media darling, who regularly appears on al-Jazeera <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CrFg4SK5Q0> . Director of the Bridges Foundation <http://www.bridges-foundation.org/> -which teaches Muslims "how to present Islam" to non-Muslims-Soliman <http://www.bridges-foundation.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article &id=222:fadel-soliman&catid=46:director&Itemid=60> also lectures at Western universities, churches, and governmental agencies, including the U.S. Dept. of Defense. His new Arabic book, Copts: Muslims Before Muhammad, asserts that, at the time of the Muslim conquest of Egypt (c. 640), the vast majority of Egyptians were not, as history has long taught, Christians, but rather prototypical Muslims, or muwahidin, who were actually being oppressed by Christians: hence, the Muslim conquest of Egypt was really about "liberating" fellow Muslims. Soliman's evidence is that the Arian sect, which rejected the claim that Jesus was coequal with God, was present in 4th century Egypt. Therefore, according to Soliman, the indigenous Egyptians were practicing Islam hundreds of years before it was founded in the 7th century. As with much of modern academia's approach to Islam, this thesis is based on pure fiction. While the Arians were pronounced heretics at the Council of Nicea (325) for their interpretation of the Trinity, they nonetheless accepted all of Christianity's core tenets-including original sin, crucifixion, resurrection, and salvation-all of which directly contradict Islam's teachings. What an imaginative stretch, then, for Soliman to portray the Arians as prototypical Muslims, simply because they did not believe Jesus was coequal with God (a standard that would make many people today "Muslims"). Needless to say, no historian has ever suggested that Muslims invaded Egypt to liberate "proto-Muslims." Rather, the Muslim historians who wrote our primary sources on Islam, candidly and refreshingly present the conquests as they were-conquests, for the glory and empowerment of Islam and its followers at the expense of unbelieving infidels. Of course, with the weakening of Islam in the modern era, embarrassed Muslims began to euphemize their imperialistic history, portraying jihad as "defensive," "spiritual," etc.-culminating with Soliman's fairy tale. Even the unapologetic Sayyid Qutb, the sheikh of "radical Islam," interpreted jihad and the conquests as "altruistic" endeavors to "liberate" mankind. Such sophistry is inevitable; for the Muslim conquests pose a thorny problem for Muslims. As David Cook writes in <http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520244481> Understanding Jihad, p.167: [T]he conquests were seen from the beginning as one of the incontrovertible proofs of Islam. To disavow them or to examine them critically-which has yet to happen in the Muslim world-will be very painful for Muslims especially Arabic-speaking Muslims. At every point. when Muslims have tried to abandon militant jihad for the internal, spiritual jihad. the memory of the conquests and the need to rationalize them have defeated this effort. The problem may lie in the unwillingness to confront the fact that the conquests were basically unjustified. They were not a "liberation" and they were not desired by the non-Muslim peoples; they were endured and finally accepted. Fadel Soliman, Islam expert and "bridge-builder The question remains: Are Islam's apologists disingenuous or deluded? When it comes to "bridge-building" Soliman-who provides "sensitivity training <http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1510> " to the FBI and Pentagon-one is inclined to answer in the former: his book contains academic crimes <http://islamexplained.com/UVG/UVG_video_player/TabId/89/VideoId/705/210---- --.aspx> , including flagrant mistranslations to support his thesis and wild, but undocumented, assertions (for example, that the Arians, like the Muslims, used to proclaim "There is no god but Allah and Jesus is his prophet"). That said, Muslim self-deception-typified by the impulsive need to always exonerate Islam-is a very real and widespread phenomenon. I am reminded of an Arabic op-ed I read last year in <http://www.almasry-alyoum.com/printerfriendly.aspx?ArticleID=264894> Al-Masry Al-Youm, which opened bluntly by saying: "We Muslims have an inferiority complex.and feel that our Islamic religion needs constant, daily affirmation from Europeans and Americans. What rapturous joy takes us when one of them converts-as if to reassure us that our religion is 'okay.'" Discussing how the Arab world exulted when it erroneously thought that Muslim critic Henryk Broder had accepted Islam-based on sarcastic remarks he had made-the author wrote "but we are a people who do not understand sarcasm, since it is subtle and requires a bit of thinking and intellectualizing; rather, we read quickly, with a hopeful eye, not an eye for truth and reality." Considering Islam's lax views <http://www.raymondibrahim.com/7987/muslim-world-culture-reformation-islamic ate> on deception <http://www.meforum.org/2538/taqiyya-islam-rules-of-war#_ftn11> , this comes as no surprise. After all, whether Muslims consciously deceive infidels or unconsciously deceive themselves, the goal has long been one: empowering Islam and its adherents-reality be damned. _____ Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2011/04/23/were-conquered-christians-really-liberate d-muslims/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor biso...@intellnet.org http://www.intellnet.org Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
