<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/YidWithLid/~3/2g3clu3OmDI/syria-who-is-oppos
ition-and-when-is.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email> Syria: Who Is
the Opposition and When Is The Moment of Truth? 

Posted: 24 Apr 2011 03:03 PM PDT

By Barry Rubin


There's a bit of a mystery regarding Syria. First, who is the opposition?
Second, what will happen?


Having been the first to warn about the threat and power of Islamists in
Egypt, I think that's earned me some credibility to say that Syria may well
be a different case. There is a possibility of an Islamist takeover and of
an ethnic conflict in Syria, make no mistake, but a number of factors
suggest that those things might not happen.

First, ironically, in Syria as in Tunisia the tough repression against
radical Islamists by the regime has weakened those forces. It is easy to
forget that Mubarak's Egypt was a relatively tolerant country. The Muslim
Brotherhood was allowed to operate, spread its propaganda, build a large
membership, and control institutions. In Syria, there was a bloody
suppression of the Brotherhood in the 1980s. Islamists are a lot less
organized.

Second, while this might seem a paradox, while Islamists opposed the
Egyptian regime they largely have supported the Syrian one. While the
dictatorship in Syria is nominally secular-and was strongly so in earlier
decades-President Bashar al-Assad courted Islamists with his foreign policy.
After all, his government has been strongly anti-American (though a lot of
American officials, journalists, and analysts did not seem to notice),
anti-Israel, allied with Iran, supported Hamas and Hizballah, and backed the
terrorist insurgents in Iraq. 

What's there for an Islamist not to like? Indeed, the Jordanian Muslim
Brotherhood declared a few years ago that it was not permissible to oppose
the Assad regime because of these policies.

At home, the regime promoted an Islamism that it hoped would support the
status quo. While some of these post-Brotherhood preachers might be itching
to go for an Islamist revolution, they seem to be hesitating both because
they are suspicious of the anti-regime opposition, like many current
policies, and think Assad might well win. 

No doubt, there are people in the protests who want to fight Israel and
battle America. But if that's your view, why not just support the
continuation of the Assad regime? In fact, why not denounce the protestors
as CIA and Mossad agents trying to subvert the revolutionary Islamists' best
friend in the Arabic-speaking world? The government does this and the
Islamists can join in.

Third, Syria is a very diverse country. While Egypt is about 90 percent
Sunni Muslim Arab, the figure for Syria is about 60 percent. There are
Alawites, Christians, Druze, and Kurds, too, of which only the Kurds are
Sunnis and they have a lot of nationalist feeling against the regime. 

Fourth, the Sunni Muslim Arabs, the constituency for revolutionary Islamism,
also provide a large part of the middle class, secular-oriented,
pro-democracy movement, thus providing a strong alternative leadership.
Consider that Islamism has never made big inroads within the Sunni Muslim
community of Lebanon. The parallel is far from exact but gives a sense of
that situation. 

Fifth, my sense is that in Syria there is a stronger pro-democratic middle
class and a relatively more urbanized population. Having lived under a
dictatorship that used Islamism to stay in power-like Iran but the opposite
of Egypt-people are more skeptical about that doctrine. 

I don't mean to suggest that Islamists are unimportant and might not emerge
as leading forces, but roughly speaking I would bet that while the level of
support for Islamism in Egypt is at around 30 percent-and has a tremendous
capacity for growth-the equivalent number for Syria is about 15 percent and
is naturally limited by the size of the community. 

Again, there are a lot of Islamists and potential Islamists in Syria. They
are among the demonstrators. Some fire and brimstone speeches have been made
and the slogan of "We only want to live under Islam" has been raised. The
content may seem ambiguous but everyone in Syria knows what that means. It
would be a disaster for the Christians and the Alawites who collective form
more than one-quarter of the population.

As to what will happen, there will come a moment of truth and I believe this
period has now begun. One sign of that was the eruption of serious
demonstrations in Damascus. Another would be if inter-communal strife began
or if there was any real sign of a split in the army. 

Remember that all the Arab regimes have a three-level priority of response.

Level 1: Hope that the protests will go away and can be waited out.

Level 2: Respond with a mixture of repression and promises. 

Level 3: Go to heavy repression and killing people in order to destroy the
protests and intimidate people from participation.

The shah's Iran in 1978, as well as Egypt and Tunisia in 2011, did not go
from Level 2 to Level 3 because large elements in the elite did not want to
do so. In contrast, in Iran, everyone knew that the regime would not
hesitate to go to Level 3. 

The moment of truth on this point-the transition from Level 2 to Level 3 has
apparently begun in Syria. When it is in full motion the regime will either
respond ruthlessly, indifferent to international reaction, or will lose its
nerve. All of the nonsense about Bashar as a reformer or about the existence
of an alleged "old guard" will disintegrate fast.  

(You notice that people babbling about Bashar being a liberal restrained by
the "old guard" never give specific names. That's because such people don't
exist. Bashar is the old guard.)

Does Bashar have the killer instinct like dear old dad, or is he just a
wimpy eye doctor? Assad means lion in Arabic, and Bashar will either have to
bite and scratch or be quickly perceived as a cowardly lion. And that would
be fatal. 

There's no third alternative. If he falters, the demonstrations will grow
much bigger very fast. Would the army, and especially the elite
Alawite-dominated units, step in for him and take over? Possibly.

For the moment, though, the case for cheering on and helping the Syrian
revolution is stronger than that of Libya by far. But by the same token, its
prospects are poorer than in Egypt or Tunisia precisely because those states
were more moderate than the ruthless, radical Syrian regime.

Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs
(GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International
Affairs (MERIA) Journal. His latest books are The Israel-Arab Reader
(seventh edition), The Long War for Freedom: The Arab Struggle for Democracy
in the Middle East (Wiley), and The Truth About Syria (Palgrave-Macmillan).
The GLORIA Center's webside is: http://www.gloria-center.org/. His blog is
on PajamasMedia: http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/ 

 <http://www.zemanta.com/> Enhanced by Zemanta

Please email me at yidwith...@aol.com to be put onto my mailing list. Feel
free to reproduce any article but please link back to
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com <http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/>
<https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/21392130-5716813098851351840?
l=yidwithlid.blogspot.com> 

 
<https://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NEkgr9mr8wtVm0TtiTFdm7WDpms/R_sZQtwSpM
2qve5afgp07PpFWdA/0/pa> 
 
<https://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/NEkgr9mr8wtVm0TtiTFdm7WDpms/R_sZQtwSpM
2qve5afgp07PpFWdA/1/pa> 

 

                
        

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to