Jordan's New Generation of Salafi-Jihadists Take to the Streets to Demand
Rule by Shari'a
Publication: Terrorism Monitor Volume: 9 Issue: 18
May 5, 2011 04:23 PM Age: 44 min
By: Murad Batal al-Shishani
http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37887&cHash
=021534580a1d6454cafec22bb568366d
Jordan has not escaped the political turmoil and street confrontations that
have enveloped the Middle East during the so-called "Arab Spring." The
on-going debate between the Jordanian government and protestors seeking
political reform in Jordan escalated on March 24 when one man died and
scores of others were injured in clashes that erupted between pro-government
and pro-reform protesters at the Interior Ministry Circle in Amman. The
pro-reform protestors claimed that security forces turned a blind eye to the
attacks against them.
Prime Minister Marouf Bakhit blamed the Muslim Brotherhood for the violent
developments (Jordan Times, March, 25). In an interview with Jordanian
television, Bakhit accused the group of creating chaos in the country and
taking orders from Islamist leaders in Egypt and Syria, while warning them
"not to play with fire" (Petra News [Ammon], March, 27).
Jihadists on the Street
Some Jordanian Islamists have joined street protests for the first time in
their history. These include the Salafi-Jihadists, whose members have held
demonstrations in several cities of Jordan demanding the release of their
imprisoned colleagues while stressing that their movement has paid a high
price for Jordan's alliance with United States in the so-called "War on
Terror." The jihadists, who demanded that Jordan be ruled by Shari'a, have
shown that they are large in number, organized and defiant. The jihadists
hailed the recent release of four of their colleagues and cancelled a
pre-planned demonstration in Amman a few days later, adding that "the State
[of Jordan] knows our strength" (al-Jazeera.net, April 12).
On April 15, Salafi-Jihadists were among other Jordanian groups
demonstrating after Friday prayer in various Jordanian cities. After
demonstrating in Amman, Ma'an, Salt, and Irbid, jihadists then went into the
streets of Zarqa, the hometown of Abu Mus'ab al-Zarqawi, the late leader of
al-Qaeda in Iraq who was killed in June 2006.
The protest ended with clashes between jihadists and pro-government and
security forces that resulted in some 80 injured policemen. Jordan's police
chief, Lieutenant General Hussein Majali, stated that eight civilians had
been hurt when police fired tear gas to stop Salafist demonstrators from
attacking shoppers in Zarqa: "It was clear that the demonstrators had plans
to clash with police. They carried swords and daggers and were provocative,
seeking to drag police into a bloody confrontation" (AFP, April 15).
Jordanian security services responded to the violence by conducting a series
of raids in Zarqa and the nearby town of Rassifeh that rounded up some 70
Islamists, including prominent leader Shaykh Abdul Shahatah al-Tahawi (AFP,
April 16).
Shaykh Ali Hasan al-Halabi, a prominent Salafist whose movement has a strong
enmity towards the Salafi-Jihadists, claimed the violence was the work of
those who falsely represent themselves as Salafis and are "known for their
ugly takfiri thought" (Ammon News, April 16). However, Salafi-Jihadist
leader Abu Obaidah complained that the Salafist movement had fallen "into a
trap orchestrated by security forces to drag Salafis into events not planned
for by the Salafis themselves" (Ammon News, April 28). General Majali warned
that "those who deserve it" could expect much rougher treatment from the
security services next time (Ammon News, April 16).
According to their spokesperson, Dr. Sa'ad al-Hunaiti, the Salafists denied
attacking policemen, saying they were defending themselves while blaming the
government for sending "thugs" to confront the demonstrators, similar to
earlier clashes in Amman on March 24 (Ammon News, April 15). Elsewhere,
al-Hunaiti has said the Salafist movement's intention to implement Shari'a
throughout Jordan threatens "Allah's enemies" who are coordinating with the
Jews and sending Jordanian Muslims to "fight as mercenaries alongside the
Jews and Crusaders in Afghanistan," a reference to Jordanian troops serving
with Coalition forces (Al-Sabil [Amman], April 8).
In the wake of the violence in Zarqa, the state security court charged 146
Islamists on April 24 with plotting terrorist attacks (The National [Abu
Dhabi], April 25; Jordan Times, April 26).
Structural Crisis
Like other Arab countries, Jordan has witnessed protests in the last three
months calling for political and economic reforms as well as the elimination
of corruption. Though the reform movement in Jordan has been inspired by the
popular movements in Tunisia and Egypt, it is largely a response to a local
grievances and changes in the Jordanian socio-economic structure.
The median age in Jordan is only 21.8. A high percentage of young people
have an advanced education, creating a gap between the elites and the youth.
This has combined with three important factors in creating a social
disruption in Jordan:
. The increasing role of the private sector in the national economy reflects
the sudden decrease in the role of the welfare state, which helped create
jobs for youth, particularly in marginal areas of Jordan. In this context it
is worth noting that the first demonstration protesting economic issues and
demanding the resignation of then Prime Minister Samir Rifai's was in the
marginal small town of Dhiban (southwest Amman) on January 7 (UPI, January,
8).
. The increasing frustration caused by corruption.
. Jordan has witnessed a decline in freedoms, reflected in some of the
slogans raised by the political parties and forces that took part in
demonstrations in Jordan against the intervention of the Mukhabarat (secret
service) in public life.
These factors played a major role in the development of what might be
described as a "reform movement" which reflects the changes in Jordanian
society. Jordanian journalist Musa Barhoomah, who is closely following the
protests in Jordan, told Jamestown that the protests in Jordan represent a
socially mobile movement; liberals, leftists, Islamists, youth movements,
students, teachers and professionals are all involved in this movement. [1]
Barhoomah is a member of the National Dialogue Committee formed after the
protests started in Jordan as an umbrella for "political debates over
reform," though the Muslim Brotherhood refused to join the committee. The
journalist told Jamestown that political parties, including Islamists, are
not leading this social movement, but they are part of it and support it
with their experience. This was confirmed to the author by Hamza Mansour,
secretary general of the Islamic Action Front (IAF - the political arm of
the Muslim Brotherhood), who explained the Brothers are not dominating the
reform movement in Jordan: "We are partners of all believers in real reform.
and we are an influential power in Jordan." [2]
The IAF, established by the Muslim Brotherhood in 1992, is the largest
opposition party in Jordan. It took part in the 1993 elections and won 17 of
80 seats. The party then boycotted the 1997 elections to protest the new
election law known as "One Man, One Vote," which replaced the old electoral
legislation that allowed voters to cast ballots for several candidates in
each constituency. The party again took part in the 2003 elections, the
first since King Abdullah II succeeded his father, and won 17 of 110 seats.
Remarkably, the IAF lost 11 seats in the 2007 parliamentary elections, a
poll the Islamists considered fraudulent. The current Prime Minister was in
office at that time, explaining the movement's opposition to his
re-election. The IAF boycotted the 2010 elections.
The highs and lows in IAF political participation reflect the relationship
between the Jordanian regime and the Muslim Brotherhood since the latter's
establishment in 1946. Although it was always considered an opposition
group, the Broterhood has never confronted the regime. Sometimes the
Brotherhood was a strong ally to the regime, confronting the Palestinian
factions that aimed to overthrow King Hussein's regime for instance, or
aiding the efforts to contain communism in the 1960s and 1970s.
According to some observers, the Jordanian government would not have violent
jihadists in the streets of Zarqa if it had not "excluded moderate
Islamists" from the political process and "dealt wisely and foresightedly
with the Muslim Brotherhood, which has always been an incubator for
stability and a foundation to contain radicalism, as well as [being] able to
protect everyone from religious extremism" (al-Quds al-Arabi, April 17).
Conclusion
It is worth noting that most of the jihadists in Jordan represent a new and
radical generation of the Salafi-Jihadist movement that consider themselves
the inheritors of al-Zarqawi's legacy. This new generation has been involved
in an increasing number of jihad-related prosecutions after 2003. At the
same time, developments in Jordan have shown there is a new leadership among
jihadists that prefers a more public role, indicating a tacit admission that
non-violent activism is more productive than violence in terms of political
change, as seen in Tunisia and Egypt. This marks a shift in the thinking of
some jihadists and could be a source of division in the movement. Moreover,
this means that there could be jihadists who are now willing to talk to Arab
regimes.
The Jordanian government's response to the structural problems the country
is facing will determine the future behaviour of Jordan's Islamists,
including the jihadists. Allowing demonstrations for all movements in Jordan
will make the Brotherhood a prominent, but not dominant, part of the
socio-political reform movement in Jordan. Furthermore, a prompt response to
challenges such as corruption and freedoms would help in reconciling
moderate Islamists and involving them in political life. Such a scenario
would defuse violent tendencies among jihadists by outlawing rhetoric that
legitimizes political violence.
On the other hand, if the government chooses to keep channels of
communication blocked with the Muslim Brotherhood and increases security
pressure on the jihadists, it will exacerbate the political tensions caused
by political deadlock. Such a situation will provide fertile ground for
jihadists to resort to violence.
Notes:
1. Telephone interview with Jordanian journalist Musa Bahooomah, March 29,
2011.
2. Telephone interview with Hamza Mansour, Secretary General of the Islamist
Action Front (IAF), March 31, 2011.
==========================================
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
