Bin Laden's Posthumous Fans

Posted By Barry Rubin On May 5, 2011 

As so often happens, a peripheral issue has taken over the Western debate
regarding the killing of Osama bin Laden. Whether or not the U.S. government
releases a photo of the body isn't so important. If bin Laden isn't dead,
let him prove it by sending a video to Al Jazeera. The issue is whether or
not killing him was a good thing.

As for photos, those who believe that bin Laden isn't dead won't be
convinced by photos. Ironically, many of them will simultaneously say that
the United States didn't kill bin Laden but the fact that the United States
killed bin Laden is a crime for which revenge should be taken.

We should have learned this from September 11, since many say that al-Qaeda
wasn't responsible and it was done by the U.S. government and Israel while,
at the same time, saying that it was an operation that made Muslims and
Arabs feel proud and America deserved it.

Welcome to the Middle East!

Today - and for some years now - people in the Middle East haven't hated
America because of its policies so much as defining whatever it does as
hateful because America is already an enemy. If you don't want revolutionary
Islamists to take over countries, repress all freedom, suppress women, wipe
Israel off the map, and expel all Western influence from the region then you
are their enemy. You can be a weak, contemptible enemy or a strong, bullying
- enemy but that's about the extent of your choice.

The reaction to the killing of OBL takes place in this context - those
Islamists and radical nationalists who saw bin Laden as a rival in life are
finding him a useful martyr in death. Again, the issue is not whether bin
Laden is dead but whether the United States was bad in killing him.

So far Hamas, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, the highest Muslim cleric in
Egypt, and Western favorite phony moderate Tariq Ramadan have all basically
endorsed OBL as a great guy, a real martyr, and the victim of an evil United
States.

The al-Aqsa Brigades of Fatah also apparently said so though it quickly
withdrew the statement when it made the public relations-conscious
Palestinian Authority leadership uncomfortable. Yet the idea that this is
just another American atrocity - one more reason to hate the United States -
is a powerful force among Palestinians and also in public opinion in Egypt
and Jordan.

And so the killing of OBL will enter the long list of U.S. policies for
which America is disliked by many Muslims and Arabs in particular. There is
a lesson here: whatever the United States does will be criticized because
America as a great power, a civilization, a set of policies, and a presence
internationally is hated by many, especially by revolutionary Islamists.

Consider the very "moderate" and sophisticated Mr. Ramadan, or perhaps I
should say Professor Ramadan since he's currently at Oxford University and
Notre Dame wants to hire him. That's pretty good for the grandson of a Nazi
collaborator and the son of an agent working for a Nazi collaborator (Amin
al-Husaini, the mufti of Jerusalem).

Not only did Ramadan criticize
<http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3209160.htm>  the killing of
OBL, but he also called the burial at sea "against all the Islamic rituals."
Well, was bin Laden behind the September 11 attacks? Ramadan replies: "We
don't know. Nobody knows - even the Americans." So much for moderation.

The killing poses a complex issue for Iran, Syria, and Hizballah. Iran is
harboring scores of al-Qaeda leaders but the Tehran government - and also
Hizballah - are Shia Muslims, a group that bin Laden despised. So no tears
will be shed though perhaps some anti-Americanism can be stirred up in the
Sunni Arab world by Iran.

Syria worked closely with al-Qaeda in Iraqi terrorism but Damascus has also
blamed al-Qaeda for internal attacks (ranging from possible regime hoaxes to
democratic demonstrations) and so it isn't well placed to cheer OBL now.

Regarding Pakistan, it has been an open secret - even published in the mass
media - that the Pakistani government has sponsored terrorism and
collaborated with al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Yet the U.S. government
continued to pour money into the country.

Consider the murderous attack on Mumbai, India that took hundreds of
hostages and killed so many people in cold blood. The group that conducted
it operates from Pakistan with the knowledge of the authorities there. That
government refused to cooperate with investigation or to extradite
terrorists. We're now supposed to be surprised that bin Laden was sheltering
there?

In an official press release, the Pakistani army simultaneously claims
credit for killing OBL and criticizes the United States for doing so. An
official statement from the chief of staff of Pakistan's army states
<http://www.ispr.gov.pk/front/main.asp?o=t-press_release&latest=1> :

"[We have] made it very clear that any similar action, violating the
sovereignty of Pakistan, will warrant a review on the level of military /
intelligence cooperation with the United States.

"The Corps Commanders were informed about the decision to reduce the
strength of US military personnel in Pakistan to the minimum essential.

"As regards the possibility of similar hostile action against our strategic
assets, the Forum reaffirmed that, unlike an undefended civilian compound,
our strategic assets are well protected and an elaborate defensive mechanism
is in place."

So the U.S. killing of bin Laden is a cowardly attack on "an undefended
civilian compound"; if the United States tries something like that again the
Pakistani army will fight America; and the Americans are to be punished by
expelling some of their personnel.

That's quite a highly subsidized ally you have there!

Speaking of allies, a lot of the European media coverage
<http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-european-media-reacts-to-death-of-osama-bi
n-laden/>  revolved around whether the U.S. government broke international
law by killing OBL. See previous paragraph.

And, once again, let me point out that al-Qaeda is a terrorist threat but
not a strategic threat. The real problem is with revolutionary Islamists:
Hamas, Hizballah, Iran, Syria, and the Muslim Brotherhood. If U.S. policy
goes soft on these groups - even helping them at times - terrorism,
anti-Americanism, and instability are going to get worse.

  _____  

Article printed from Rubin Reports: http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin

URL to article:
http://pajamasmedia.com/barryrubin/2011/05/05/bin-ladens-posthumous-fans/

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to