http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9463/pub_detail.asp

 

May 9, 2011


Truth And Consequences


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.153/author_detail.asp>
Gadi Adelman

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110508_TerrorGunman.jpg

 

Talk about conspiracy theories. We have all heard the varying and changing
accounts of the death of Bin Laden and undoubtedly this will continue for
weeks and months and even years to come.

 

There is an old, wise Yiddish Proverb that says "What you don't see with
your eyes, don't invent with your mouth". Our current administration should
consider this before any of them speak.

 

Throughout Israel's history each and every time any incident occurred where
Israel was suspect, Israeli officials always say the same thing. Whether or
not Israel had the slightest involvement the answer is always the same. "No
comment".

 

Vice President Joe Biden started this whole mess and now it is never ending.
Last Sunday, President Barack Obama announced that "a small team of
Americans" had killed Osama bin Laden. It was a short and vague description
and that is where it should have ended.

 

But then at a dinner at Washington's Ritz Carlton Hotel marking the 50th
anniversary of the Atlantic Council, Biden
<http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100086416/joe-biden-opens-his
-mouth-about-us-navy-seals/> stated,

 

"Let me briefly acknowledge tonight's distinguished honorees. Admiral James
Stavridis is a, is the real deal. He can tell you more about and understands
the incredible, the phenomenal, the just almost unbelievable capacity of his
Navy SEALs and what they did last Sunday."

 

He also stated,

 

"Folks, I'd be remiss also if I didn't say an extra word about the
incredible events, extraordinary events of this past Sunday. As Vice
President of the United States, as an American, I was in absolute awe of the
capacity and dedication of the entire team, both the intelligence community,
the CIA, the SEALs. It just was extraordinary."

 

Certainly we all want to know what really happened and how, we would love to
see pictures or better yet, a video from start to finish. We would love to
talk to and interview the men that were there, but there is a reason that
they call it classified.

 

My concern is of a different problem. While everyone is playing armchair
quarter back and guessing this, that and the other, and all of the media is
scrambling to uncover what they can about this operation, are we missing
perhaps greater and bigger issues?

 

It seems whenever a story such as this arises, our media loses sight of
everything else. I know this is a big story; it will end up being one of the
biggest since the assassination of Kennedy, but let's not lose sight of the
big picture.

 

Al-Qaeda will have a successor; it may be Ayman al-Zawahri, Osama bin
Laden's deputy commander. It could be Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S. born cleric
who is the mastermind behind several terror atrocities and the leader of Al
Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.

 

The point is the war on terror (the one our administration says doesn't
exist) and that of al-Qaeda is far from over just because Bin Laden is dead.
In all likelihood it will get worse before it gets better.  

 

 

Interestingly, last year on May 26, John Brennan, the chief counterterrorism
advisor to the President,
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-assistant-president-home
land-security-and-counterterrorism-john-brennan-csi> explained that our
enemy is not terrorism. He made this statement at the CSIS (Center for
Strategic and International Studies) in which he announced that President
Obama would be releasing his National Security Strategy the next day.

 

"The President's strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our
enemy is not 'terrorism' because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not
'terror' because terror is a state of mind and as Americans we refuse to
live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as 'jihadists' or 'Islamists'
because jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam, meaning to
purify oneself or one's community, and there is nothing holy or legitimate
or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children."

 

However, just a day after the Bin Laden raid John Brennan
<http://www.scribd.com/doc/54474159/Osama-Bin-Laden-Death-John-Brennan-Q-A-A
ssistant-to-the-President-for-Homeland-Security-and-Counterterrorism-5-2-201
1-Full-Transcript> stated at a press conference,

 

"I think the accomplishment that very brave personnel from the United States
government were able to realize yesterday is a defining moment in the war
against al Qaeda, the war on terrorism, by decapitating the head of the
snake known as al Qaeda."

 

Hmmm. So which is it Mr. Brennan? Are we or are we not at war with terror?
But I digress.

 

May 4, just 3 days after the death of Bin Laden a story broke out of San
Diego. Local ABC affiliate channel 10 news broke the story with the
following headline, "Terrorist Group Setting Up Operations Near Border,
Hezbollah Considered To Be More Advanced Than Al-Qaida".

 

According to the article and video," a former U.S. intelligence agent told
10News,

 

"We are looking at 15 or 20 years that Hezbollah has been setting up shop in
Mexico".

 

The article explained,

 

Now, the group is blending into Shi'a Muslim communities in Mexico,
including Tijuana. Other pockets along the U.S.-Mexico border region remain
largely unidentified as U.S. intelligence agencies are focused on the drug
trade.

 

The former agent continued,

 

"They are recognized by many experts as the 'A' team of Muslim terrorist
organizations."

 

"Their operators are far more skilled . they are the equals of Russians,
Chinese or Cubans," he said. "I consider Hezbollah much more dangerous in
that sense because of strategic thinking; they think more long-term."

 

He tracked, along with Mexican intelligence, two Hezbollah operatives in
safe houses in Tijuana and Durango,

 

"I confirmed the participation of cartel members as well as other Hezbollah
individuals living and operating out of there," he said.

 

Was this on any national network? Was it seen on any other channel? Why was
this not the headline on every major network? Because we have taken our eye
off the ball and were too busy trying to over analyze everything about the
Bin Laden raid.

 

I have written and lectured on Hezbollah at length. According to the United
States Council on Foreign Relations, they are responsible for five major
terrorist attacks against the U.S. and Israel, including the 1983 suicide
truck bombing of the U.S. Marines barracks in Beirut, Lebanon in which 241
U.S. servicemen were murdered. 

 

Hezbollah was the first group to use suicide bombing. They are also one of
the first terror groups to utilize assassination, and capturing as tactics
against foreign soldiers in the Middle East.

 

Back in 2008, Ynet news
<http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3644647,00.html> reported on the
internal Homeland Security Threat Assessment for the years 2008-2013,

 

Homeland Security Threat Assessment for the years 2008-2013 says Hezbollah
may foment terror attack in US if there is some kind of 'triggering' event.
'The threat of terrorism and the threat of extremist ideologies have not
abated," Chertoff says.

 

The article went on quoting the report,

 

Terrorists will continue to try to evade US border security measures and
place operatives inside the mainland to carry out attacks, the 38-page
assessment said. It also said that they may pose as refugees or asylum
seekers or try to exploit foreign travel channels such as the visa waiver
program, which allows citizens of 34 countries to enter the US without
visas.

 

Or perhaps they will just come across our southern border like the hundreds
of thousands of others have? 

 

On December 15 of last year a Kuwaiti professor made a
<http://www.chroniclewatch.com/2010/12/15/kuwaiti-professor-dreams-of-anthra
x-attack-on-the-us/> video in which he was excited to share these thoughts,

 

"Four pounds of anthrax - in a suitcase this big - carried by a fighter
through tunnels from Mexico into the US are guaranteed to kill 330,000
Americans within a single hour, if it is properly spread in population
centers there. What a horrifying idea! 9/11 will be small change in
comparison. Am I right? There is no need for airplanes, conspiracies,
timings, and so on. One person, with the courage to carry four pounds of
anthrax will go to the White House lawn and will spread this "confetti" all
over them, and then will do these cries of joy. It will turn into a real
celebration."

 

He also explained the following,

 

"Al-Qaeda has laboratories just like Hezbollah. Hezbollah has laboratories
in South Lebanon in which it produces weapons and sells them. Hezbollah has
laboratories in South Lebanon from which it sells weapons to Romania and
Hungary."

 

Maybe we ought to be more concerned with those that are still alive and
planning our death rather than examining the death of another.

 

 
<http://gadiadelman.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=43:if-o
ur-national-security-operation-doesnt-shock-us-awake-will-anything&catid=3:i
slam&Itemid=13> FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.153/author_detail.asp> Gadi
Adelman is a freelance writer and lecturer on the history of terrorism and
counterterrorism. He grew up in Israel, studying terrorism and Islam for 35
years after surviving a terrorist bomb in Jerusalem in which 7 children were
killed. Since returning to the U. S., Gadi teaches and lectures to law
enforcement agencies as well as high schools and colleges. He can be heard
every Thursday night at 8PM est. on his own radio show "AmericaAkbar" on
<http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/show.aspx?user
url=radio-jihad&h=f0033>  Blog Talk Radio. He can be reached through his
website  <http://gadiadelman.com/> gadiadelman.com.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to