The Reluctant Assassination of Osama Posted By Roger L Simon On May 8, 2011
Did Barack Obama want to assassinate Osama bin Laden? He may have at some point, because he gave the ultimate order, or allowed it to happen. But I suspect the president was deeply ambivalent. It's not just his postmodern worldview that suggests this reluctance. It is the discombobulated aftermath of the killing, the weirdly botched reportage featuring such events as cabinet members in the situation room supposedly watching a (we learned) non-existent streaming video of the action and the statement that bin Laden - who had been under surveillance for months from a CIA safe house - was living in a million dollar mansion. That was dialed down within a day or two to $250,000 and then revealed, in videos, to be close to a slum. In fact, OBL's squalid living conditions made the hated Guantanamo seem like the Four Seasons. If the SEALs had taken him alive, it would have been an upgrade. Indeed, it was those SEALs that were the only ones who performed their part with professionalism. Everything else seemed ad hoc, as if thrown together at the last moment after, one guesses, various parties finally convinced, or even forced, the president to act. There was no preparation for the aftermath, no apparent plan of how to inform or not inform the public of this cataclysmic event when such a decision was in many ways as important as the action itself. What resulted was an embarrassing blabbermouth display of public contradiction. Some of this can be justified by the fog of war, but not to the extent we saw. Something more was at work and I think it was a reluctant president. (Compare the aftermath of this enterprise to last year's putative Mossad assassination of an Hamas leader in Dubai. The Israelis were absolutely silent, as they almost always are, about their actions. Could the US have done the same about the bin Laden assassination? Not entirely. The conditions are different. But a certain amount of judicious silence until the facts were known would have been a vast improvement. ) Still, Osama is dead. Huzzah. And we get to see something of who or what he was. It's a strange case. On one level his absurdly bad dye job on several of the videos - not to mention the one with the now grey-bearded Al Qaeda chieftain channel-surfing himself on television - is hysterically funny. It makes him look like some cheesy huckster from the far reaches of the cable listings. On another level, however, the videos are blood-curdling, revealing a bizarre sociopath lost in his own weird narcissistic world. Bin Laden was an odd bird indeed, but odd in the sense that serial killers and mass murderers are odd, trapped in their own paranoid universes, not unlike Charles Manson, who lived under similar conditions at the Spahn Ranch. And just like Manson, Osama was able to attract acolytes. Unfortunately, however, in the case of the Saudi, those acolytes were exponentially more powerful and numerous, including, evidently, a significant portion of the Pakistani intelligence service and military. Indeed, he still undoubtedly has millions, even hundreds of millions of acolytes. You might think that the promulgation of these videotapes would give some of them pause, but I suspect it will only be minor, if at all, and that the monster will become a martyr of Che-like proportions, mythologized even by (or especially by) those who participated in turning him in. The "strong horse" may have been felled but his persona and ideology will live on. The societal mental illness that created and housed bin Laden runs too deep. Consider for a moment why he was able to subsist in near plain site in Pakistan. No matter who ultimately passed the word (Michael Ledeen <http://pajamasmedia.com/michaelledeen/> [1] and others have some interesting theories) he was hidden for five years by the Pakistanis. Why? Because they hate America? Sure, to some extent. And, yes, there were no doubt internecine rivalries and power struggles involved. But most importantly it is Islam itself that motivated bin Laden's protectors. They are true believers. He was God's man or their god's man. They would never turn him in. This is not going to go away anytime soon. Not even close. On a related note, one thing that caught my eye among the welter of bin Laden coverage was an actual quote from the funeral prayer supposedly read by the Navy when the mass murderer was tossed into the sea. It's on Andrew Bostom <http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2011/05/07/did-naval-burial-ceremony-for-b in-laden-curse-jews-and-christians-and-confer-pardon-and-paradise-on-the-mus lim-mass-murderer/> 's blog [2]. (Bostom was properly concerned with whether this prayer goes on to curse Jews and Christians, as it normally would, but the passage used is even more disturbing in its way.) "O Allah, forgive him, have mercy on him, pardon him, grant him security, provide him a nice place and spacious lodgings, wash him (off from his sins) with water, snow and ice, purify him from his sins as a white garment is cleansed from dirt, replace his present abode with a better one, replace his present family with a better one, replace his present partner with a better one, make him enter paradise and save him from the trials of grave [sic] and the punishment of hell." "Replace his present family with a better one, replace his partner with a better one"? This is the religion we are asked to respect? I don't know about you, but I think it's horrifying. _____ Article printed from Roger L. Simon: http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon URL to article: http://pajamasmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2011/05/08/the-reluctant-assassination-o f-osama/ URLs in this post: [1] Michael Ledeen: http://pajamasmedia.com/michaelledeen/ [2] Andrew Bostom's blog: http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2011/05/07/did-naval-burial-ceremony-for-bi n-laden-curse-jews-and-christians-and-confer-pardon-and-paradise-on-the-musl im-mass-murderer/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
