http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2070348,00.html?xid=feed-yaho
o-full-mostpopular

 


Bin Laden's Great Mistake: What Osama Never Understood About the American
Spirit


By Romesh Ratnesar <http://www.time.com/time/letters/email_letter.html>
Monday, May 09, 2011 

 

http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2011/1105/american_spirit_0508.jpg

Revelers cheer outside the White House on May 2, 2011, after President
Barack Obama's announcement of Osama bin Laden's death

When President Barack Obama announced on May 1 that U.S. forces had killed
Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, I was among those who headed to the White
House. The mood in Lafayette Square was joyous, ebullient, cathartic -
though hardly the bacchanal of vengeful jingoism that some in the media have
portrayed it to be, or an expression of "orgasmic euphoria in news of
bloodshed" as David Sirota claimed on Salon.com
<http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/02/osama_and_chants_of_
usa> . An outsider would have been struck by the crowd's diversity, by now
so familiar to Americans that we barely notice it. I'd guess that a
plurality of the flag wavers were white, but I saw plenty of exuberant
black, Asian, Latino and multiracial faces too. An elated young Muslim
American, wearing a headscarf, enthused to a television crew about the sense
of unity and belonging she felt with those around her. The whole scene would
have bewildered bin Laden as much as it would have repelled him. And it goes
a long way toward explaining why his war on America was doomed to fail. 

Bin Laden's goal on Sept. 11, 2011, wasn't merely to murder as many innocent
Americans as possible. To his followers, bin Laden predicted that the U.S.
would overreact to the attacks and allow itself to be drawn into an endless,
enervating conflict with the Muslim world. He believed al-Qaeda could bleed
America into bankruptcy. Like the U.S.S.R. before it, the U.S. was a spent
empire, a soft superpower, "a weak horse." As the terrorism expert Daveed
Gartenstein-Ross writes, bin Laden believed that "just as the Arab fighters
and Afghan mujahidin had destroyed Russia economically, al-Qaeda was now
doing the same to the United States."
<http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,2068945,00.html> (See
pictures of Osama bin Laden's Pakistan hideout.)

In some respects, he was right. The war on terror has cost the U.S. upwards
of $3 trillion, saddled the country with deficits as far as the eye can see
and constrained our ability to invest in the future. In the past decade,
economic rivals in the developing world have taken advantage of our fixation
on terrorism to erase the U.S.'s competitive lead. As Ezra Klein of the
Washington Post noted, America's troubles have been largely of its own
design: we didn't have to invade Iraq, pass tax cuts we couldn't afford or
turn a blind eye while investment bankers played roulette with the housing
market. From his bunker in Abbottabad, Pakistan, bin Laden no doubt
delighted in our economic travails. But we brought them on ourselves. 

And yet for all that - and despite all the hand-wringing about American
decline - the U.S. remains the world's most powerful, prosperous nation,
while bin Laden swims with sharks. Why? The bravery, persistence and
ingenuity of the American military are the most obvious reasons. But the
scene outside the White House that night also revealed something about the
sources of American strength.
<http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,2068860,00.html> (See
pictures of people celebrating bin Laden's death.)

Bin Laden's fateful error was to assume that American society in the wake of
9/11 looked anything like that of the U.S.S.R. during its last decade of
existence. By the time the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, the Russian standard
of living was in decline and population growth had stagnated, eroding the
Soviet economic base. The population of the U.S., on the other hand, grew by
13.2% in the decade before 2001. The U.S. added more people during that time
than in any period since World War II. In the past 10 years, the rate of
growth slowed to 9.7% - in part because of security-driven immigration
restrictions. And yet compared with every other Western industrialized
country, where populations are shrinking, the U.S. is a picture of vitality.
And unlike, say, that of China, the American fertility rate remains high
enough to sustain economic expansion for at least another generation. 

The secret of American resilience is not just that the U.S. attracts
newcomers; it's also what they do when they arrive in the country. In his
book The Future of Power, the Harvard political scientist Joseph S. Nye Jr.
points out that in 1998, Chinese- or Indian-born engineers ran one-quarter
of all high-tech companies in Silicon Valley. By 2005, 1 in 4 technology
start-ups had been launched by immigrants. A 2009 Brookings Institution
study found that among people with advanced degrees, immigrants are three
times more likely to file for patents than native-born Americans. The U.S.'s
greatest long-term strategic asset, Nye writes, lies in its ability to
"attract the best and brightest from the rest of the world and meld them
into a diverse culture of creativity."
<http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1963688,00.html> (See
stunning aerial photos of the Sept. 11 destruction.)

That was the culture - the country - on display that night in Lafayette
Square. It was a young, college-age crowd. Many were children of immigrants
who arrived during the wave of the '90s, members of "the generation that has
borne the heaviest share of the burden" since 9/11, in Obama's words. What
bin Laden never understood is that, whatever the body blows suffered over
the past decade, American society retained its capacity to renew itself. The
U.S. was able not only to sustain the long war but also to produce
innovations that have changed the world: Google Earth, the iPhone, Facebook,
Twitter. America today is probably a less open and less confident nation
than it was on 9/11. But it has become a more youthful, more diverse and
more dynamic one as well. 

That isn't a prescription for complacency. Our infrastructure and
public-education system are in dreadful shape, Washington's political class
appears hopelessly inept, and we are drowning in debt. The benefits we have
reaped from immigration could still be squandered if politicians continue to
pander to the xenophobic fringe. The defeat of bin Laden presents the U.S.
with an opportunity to rebuild its strength at home. Doing so will mean
learning from our mistakes. But there are lessons in success too.

Ratnesar, a TIME contributing editor-at-large, is a Bernard L. Schwartz
Fellow at the New America Foundation and the author of Tear Down This Wall:
A City, a President, and the Speech That Ended the Cold War. His column on
global affairs usually appears on Mondays on TIME.com.



Read more:
<http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2070348,00.html#ixzz1LxVX645
Q>
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2070348,00.html#ixzz1LxVX645Q



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to