http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=43402
Killing Osama
by Oliver North
05/10/2011
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- It took nine years, seven months and 21 days to pinpoint
the man who plotted, paid for and perpetrated the terror attacks of 9-11-01.
When a U.S. Navy SEAL team finally found Osama bin Laden in the third-floor
bedroom of a comfortable house in a suburb of Islamabad, Pakistan, they
killed him.
Last Sunday's complex and highly successful operation validates Ronald
Reagan's maxim for terrorists after U.S. Navy SEALs captured the murderous
hijackers of the Achille Lauro in October 1985: "You can run, but you can't
hide." Afterward, one of the participants penned a corollary: "Don't bother
to run -- you will only die tired."
Those axioms were validated again last Sunday by a 24-man Navy SEAL task
force and aircrews from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment --
the "Nightstalkers" -- when they took out the world's most wanted terrorist.
These "Operators" -- part of the same "Tier One" Joint Special Operations
Command (JSOC) unit the Reagan administration employed in Grenada in 1983,
and two years later during the Achille Lauro hijacking, are now the focus of
public acclaim and controversy thanks to the O-Team's insatiable thirst for
public approval.
President Barack Obama's surprise announcement at 11:35 p.m. Sunday night,
"The United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden,"
has generated well-deserved accolades for those who planned and executed the
mission. Unfortunately, it has also prompted extraordinary criticism,
speculation and damaging revelations about operational capabilities that
ought to remain classified at best or uncertain at least.
Within hours of Obama's announcement, unnamed administration officials were
providing what turned out to be conflicting details on what transpired in
Abbottabad. This transparent attempt to show how closely the White House
"supervised" the operation only served to stimulate a tsunami of controversy
and obscure the extraordinary courage and skill with which the raid was
carried out.
The O-Team should have known the so-called mainstream media's quest to find
fault with the U.S. military would not be placated by the narrative they had
released. The potentates of the press demand to know:
"Did the SEALs 'botch' the destruction of a damaged MH-60 helicopter" at the
compound?
"Was there a 40-minute firefight with the SEALs or not?"
"Did the president personally order bin Laden killed?"
"Why the haste to give this murderous terror leader a Muslim burial at sea?"
"Why not release photos of the dead terror kingpin?"
At the United Nations, America's critics now want to investigate whether
Osama bin Laden's human rights were violated. Pakistani officials,
implausibly claiming they knew nothing of the al-Qaida founder's presence in
the compound, are complaining about violations of their sovereignty. A
Native American tribal leader has even groused about bin Laden's code-name:
"Geronimo." And in Congress, anti-military doves insist we should
immediately pull U.S. troops out of Afghanistan.
None of this had to happen. All the White House had to do once they knew bin
Laden was dead was to say nothing. That's the way it's supposed to be for
covert operations. When asked, respond with: "No comment."
Such a course of action would no doubt result in extraordinary speculation.
Photos of the tail section of a U.S. MH-60 helicopter and images of the dead
taken by Pakistani authorities after the raid would still get published, and
global "social networks" would be full of rumors, theories and supposition
for weeks or months. But intricate details on intelligence means and
methods, tactics, techniques and procedures, numbers of U.S. personnel
involved and unique communications equipment and capabilities would remain
matters of conjecture.
Inevitably, there would be unconfirmed "leaks" from officials in Washington
and Islamabad. Yet, the message to America's enemies would still be the
same. Be afraid. Be very afraid. After all, that is the reason we have JSOC.
A "we will not confirm or deny" statement from the White House in the
aftermath of the JSOC operation would have made it more difficult in the
short-term for Obama to appear "decisive" and "hands on." But years from
now, when the full story was finally revealed, he would have been seen as
more "presidential." It also would have made it easier for those friends we
do have in Pakistan to continue cooperating with our military and
intelligence services.
Some lessons learned:
Our Special Operations troops are world-class athletes who employ remarkable
technology while taking enormous risks. Only a small handful -- like Navy
SEAL Medal of Honor recipient Michael Murphy, for whom a destroyer was named
this week -- are ever recognized for their courage.
Second, the enhanced interrogation techniques approved in the Bush
administration worked. Thank you, GWB.
Third, U.S. bases in Afghanistan were essential to the success of the
operation. The ayatollahs running Tehran's nuclear weapons program are
hoping we quickly pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Fourth, the decision not to release "death photos" of bin Laden was right.
Bowe Bergdahl, a U.S. Army soldier, is still being held by the Taliban.
Enough said.
Finally, we are told by the president's handlers that he made a "courageous"
and "gutsy call" in ordering the SEALs to eliminate al-Qaida's founder,
instead of doing it with a JDAM or a cruise missile. But given what we now
know about where bin Laden was hiding -- surrounded by an entire division of
Pakistan's Army -- that was never really an option.
Obama really had but two choices: Go with the JSOC mission or not go at all.
He made the right decision. Regrettably, he also decided he wanted everyone
to know about it.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
