http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/36392
Preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution
Obama's ineligibility and what Reagan would have done
- Lawrence Sellin Thursday, May 12, 2011
The oath of office for US President is unique. No other Federal official is
required to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.
The President is the custodian of the Constitution, the fundamental laws
governing our country. It is the President's duty and solemn obligation to
ensure that the foundation of our republic is not undermined.
It is logical, therefore, that the Founders mandated special requirements
for the office, in particular, that the President must be a natural born
citizen i.e. native born of citizen parents.
That clause was specifically designed to prevent an individual becoming
President, who has allegiance to another country or to a philosophy inimical
to the Constitution.
Ask yourselves - do the policies and behavior of Barack Hussein Obama
describe an individual who wants to preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution or one who wishes to change the US into something drastically
different?
Obama, in his first act as President, dishonored the oath of office by
accepting a position for which he was not eligible.
It was not a demonstration of "preserve, protect and defend", but more
likely an initial step towards radically transforming the country by
undermining the foundation upon which it is based.
Without the Constitution, there is no linchpin for the rule of law and the
enforcement of law becomes an arbitrary tool of the state. It is a recipe
for tyranny.
In fact, how has the Obama Administration exhibited its intent to "preserve,
protect and defend" any of our values or our way of life: denigrating
American exceptionalism, apologizing for America, bowing to foreign leaders,
placating our enemies and alienating our friends, reducing border security,
bankrupting the country, punishing personal initiative, supporting amnesty
for illegals, weakening our military, promoting political fragmentation and
racial division, increasing czars and legislation by administrative fiat,
not preventing union thugs from harassing ordinary Americans (think Nazi
brownshirts), enormously expanding government (think Soviet Union) etc.?
Meanwhile the Republicans dither. They have become the party of strategic
withdrawal.
They will hesitate and compromise every time they meet the slightest
resistance from the Democrats and their propaganda machine, the main stream
media.
Republicans must not be afraid to take the fight directly to Barack Obama
The present Republican leaders seem to think that they can win elections by
being more like the Democrats.
The opposite is required. More than ever, Americans need clear principles to
rally around, not some nuances buried in the footnotes.
Republicans must not be afraid to take the fight directly to Barack Obama.
The time has long past to sweep aside the race card and not be intimidated
by it. As long as the Republicans fear it, Obama will use it. He is not a
post-racial, but a retro-racial President, who uses racial and ethnic
polarization to mobilize his base and silence his opposition.
I, for one, don't like the policies of his white half either.
Obama's background IS an issue. It cuts to the very heart of the duties and
responsibilities of a President. Voters have a right to know who he really
is and what he really believes, not some fairy tale produced by ghost
writers, marketing firms and secretive financial backers, and all of it
shrouded by hidden documents.
We need Presidential candidates who will take unequivocal stands on urgent
national security issues including: to preserve, protect, and defend the
Constitution and that Sharia law is clearly incompatible with its
principles; financial solvency; genuinely secure borders; no illegal
immigrant amnesty ever again; a strong military; a foreign policy based
first on US interests; and significantly reducing government.
We need an American Renaissance founded on equality, unity, strength and
pride. And no more apologies.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
