http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148 <http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=15493695>
&sid=15493695

 

Salt Lake FBI office has serious lapses that could jeopardize national
security, sources say

May 10th, 2011 @ 10:00pm

Lori Prichard reporting 
produced by Kelly Just 

SALT LAKE CITY - A pattern of long-term and ongoing problems inside the
regional headquarters of the FBI in Salt Lake City could have catastrophic
consequences to national security, sources connected to the FBI say.

Nearly a dozen self-described whistleblowers - including those with strong
ties to the FBI's Salt Lake field office - have come forward to expose
potentially serious security breaches, including the removal of classified
documents from the office contrary to strict FBI protocol.

"It's a huge deal," one FBI source said. "We're talking about the pinnacle
of law enforcement. And they've got corruption inside their own office."

"The actions that Salt Lake City is taking definitely could jeopardize
national security," another FBI source said. 

Concerns over security protocol, records access 

These whistleblowers were interviewed as part of a yearlong investigation by
KSL News, which was able to corroborate much of what each source reported by
conducting individual interviews without the knowledge of other sources.
These individuals spoke on the condition that their identities be protected.

"We're talking about the pinnacle of law enforcement. And they've got
corruption inside their own office." -KSL source

The sources provided details of multiple violations of internal FBI
policies, including lax oversight of highly classified documents stored
inside the Salt Lake City office's Secret Compartmented Information
Facility; the failure to enforce rules that restrict access to areas where
classified documents are kept; violations of policies that govern the
issuance of FBI credentials; and concerns that high-level FBI officials may
have covered up a formal complaint of security violations.

The FBI declined to officially comment on any of the allegations.

"There is a severe problem with the Salt Lake office," one source told KSL.
"None of them will come forward because they know the FBI will come after
them with a vengeance."

"People are afraid," another FBI source said. "People are afraid to say
anything. This has been going on for years."

The allegations brought forth by the confidential sources all stem from
concerns that strict FBI security protocol is bypassed and sometimes
blatantly ignored in the Salt Lake City field office. They say these matters
were brought to FBI supervisors, and the sources claim the supervisors did
not adequately investigate those complaints.

With regard to the oversight of classified documents, several sources told
KSL that the Salt Lake field office has failed to number certain individual
records or keep track of their circulation.

"I never saw any document control numbers on any classified documents," a
source directly familiar with the operation said. Such numbers help
determine the location of the documents, who had access to the classified
information and when.

"People are afraid to say anything. This has been going on for years." -KSL
source

"That's a big problem because if you don't know what documents you've
originated, and you don't know where they're at, and you don't have any
system for control, then how do you establish and maintain accountability?"
the source said.

KSL has confirmed the veracity of this claim regarding some classified
documents. Additionally, KSL has confirmed that some classified information
is being removed from the Salt Lake field office, an indication of security
lapses. And because some classified information exists without a document
control or serial number, this FBI field office would have no knowledge of
its removal.

The sources also maintain the FBI fails to adequately secure its document
storage facility, which is located on the top floor of its Salt Lake
headquarters at 257 E. 200 South. The storage area is referred to as "the
penthouse," but is officially known as the Secret Compartmented Information
Facility or SCIF.  Such facilities contain the most highly-classified and
possibly sensitive records compiled by the U.S. government, including
documents outlining threats to homeland security, records of surveillance on
suspected terrorist cells, and the identification of informants, such as
those working inside some of the most violent gangs in the Salt Lake area.

SCIFs are located all over the world. Many can be found on military bases,
often in underground bunkers with fortified walls and multiple layers of
security in place. Sources familiar with the Salt Lake FBI operations say
there has been negligence in ensuring the security of the local SCIF.

One specific example sources point to is the blinds on the SCIF's windows
that are fully raised on a periodic basis - something FBI protocol and the
U.S. government intelligence conglomerate at large, strictly prohibits. 

"That's the easiest way to spy," one source said. "All you need is a
telephoto lens and sit inside the next building."

Though one must sign in to the SCIF to open it in the morning, it is left
open throughout the remainder of the day where employees are said to "badge
in" in order to gain access. However, sources warn it is not guarded and
there is nothing to prevent someone from piggybacking on someone else's
access.

 <http://www.ksl.com/emedia/slc/2491/249144/24914451.jpg>
http://www.ksl.com/emedia/slc/2491/249144/24914451.jpg?filter=ksl/img200

Several sources KSL spoke to independently described the same security
concerns at the FBI's Salt Lake City office. 

And it's what one could do with information once obtained from inside the
FBI field office that is cause for concern, according to sources.

"Anyone can walk out of any field office with anything," one source said.
"FBI employees have 24-hour access to the building. On one floor is where
all the closed files are and the night guys are on a different floor. So
unless they walk around and see what's going on, they don't pay attention.
People come and go as they please out of the Salt Lake City office."

Another source independently described the same concerns.

"You have multiple floors. You have multiple entrances and exits and you
don't have any guards," said the source, who is also familiar with the
operation of the office. "(People) could walk in with cameras. They could
walk in with computers. They could walk out with computers or documents."

The source added, "There's a camera at every door.  Everybody that comes and
goes is on video. To my knowledge, there is no one going back and reviewing
the tapes to see if something has left the building."

The FBI, like any intelligence agency, operates on a "need to know" basis.
Yet, in the Salt Lake City field office, sources inside describe the
atmosphere as free-flowing with little attempt to control sensitive or
secret information.

"I worked on a floor in the Salt Lake office that you couldn't keep anything
a secret," another FBI insider said. "Everyone heard everything.
Conversations carried across rooms."

"If you were a spy looking for information, then the information definitely
flowed in the open," said another source in a separate interview. 

"(Robert) Hanssen could happen in Salt Lake City," warned this source,
referring to the former FBI special agent whose case is considered to be one
of the most significant intelligence breaches in U.S. history.

Hanssen spent 25 years working as an FBI agent. He also dedicated much of
that time spying for the Russians. Hanssen was arrested a decade ago and is
currently serving a life without parole sentence in federal prison. 

"The real problem comes in when you have these serious spy, espionage cases.
Or it could be someone selling secrets even inside the United States," said
Coleen Rowley, a retired FBI agent who was among the whistleblowers who
revealed details of the FBI's failure to pursue evidence of the plot to
attack New York's World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. She warns lax
security could result in a leak of information detrimental to the nation's
security.

"You have got to get information out about a potential security risk because
you don't know for yourself," she said in an interview at her home in
Minneapolis, Minn. "You've got to at least have higher-ups deal with this
effectively."

Rowley said the FBI and other intelligence agencies that deal in sensitive
information have traditionally regarded any security breaches of any size as
a serious matter. "Let's say even in this case that there's lax security and
it didn't lead to any true security leak to an enemy, it could in the
future," she said regarding questions raised of the FBI's Salt Lake City
operations.

One example revealed 

Sources who have worked in Salt Lake field office say concerns about
security were heightened when the FBI granted high-level credentials to
certain task force members.  When pressed for a specific example, all cite
the credentials provided to Utah state fraud investigator Shane Tiernan,
when he was appointed to an FBI-led task force on health care and, then the
violent crimes task force.

Sources say Tiernan was given an FBI Secure Access Control System key card,
known as a SACS badge. Such badges are typically given to law enforcement
agents engaged in investigations led by the FBI. But these sources tell KSL
the type of badge given to Tiernan is considered a high-level credential,
allowing him 24-hour access to the FBI field office.

"It's the fox guarding the henhouse. To my knowledge, you don't have a third
party doing any kind of investigation. Unfortunately, you have a field
office conducting both sides of the investigation." -KSL source

These sources say Tiernan frequently wore his FBI-issued SACS badge and
allegedly was allowed to maintain his credentials even after he left public
service.

"He had credentials after he was off the task force and during the time he
was a civilian employee. He was in another state working as a civilian. When
he returned to Utah, he still had those credentials, which is a direct
violation of FBI policy," said a former state investigator who worked with
Tiernan.

When KSL shared information regarding Tiernan's alleged access with Rowley,
she raised concerns that such lapses in security could lead to harm. "That's
very lax and wrong and they should have been much more careful than that."

When fellow state investigators complained to the FBI about Tiernan's
access, they were informed that an FBI investigation had been launched.

But months passed with little or no information regarding the results of
that investigation.

"Shane Tiernan knows about the improprieties of the FBI," said one source
knowledgeable of the FBI probe. "The FBI's not going to do anything to him.
The FBI will never besmirch his name because he'll turn around and take down
the supervisors that he knew."

One such alleged improper practice involves an agent "loaning" an FBI-issued
automatic firearm to Tiernan for a period of one year, according to three
separate sources who worked with Tiernan at the time.

Tiernan declined a formal request for an interview. However in a telephone
conversation, he said he was provided a white SACS badge by the FBI. Sources
say Tiernan was given a blue SACS badge - a badge that is given only to FBI
government employees - and includes an "LE" designation for law enforcement.

 <http://www.ksl.com/emedia/slc/2491/249144/24914447.jpg>
http://www.ksl.com/emedia/slc/2491/249144/24914447.jpg?filter=ksl/img200

Retired FBI agent Coleen Rowley says it's critical for these whistleblowers
and others to come forward with lapses that could cripple national security.


KSL confirmed through Utah Peace Officer Standards and Training that Tiernan
does not have POST I law enforcement officer qualifications, which would
prohibit him from being hired as full-fledged law enforcement officer.
Instead, his qualifications fall under POST II special function officer,
which requires less training.

Tiernan also denied being under investigation by the FBI. However, he stated
that there was an internal probe, but "it was dropped by McTighe," referring
to James McTighe, the FBI's special agent in charge of the Salt Lake City
field office.

Tiernan's case, according to multiple FBI sources, validates overall
concerns regarding the bureau's handling of access to its Salt Lake field
office.

"It could be risking national security," one source said. Another added: "It
certainly calls into question the integrity of a lot of people who are
placed in positions of responsibility within the organization. That they may
not be doing what is the best for the United States." 

All of those interviewed expressed a concern for the lapses in security.
They were also unanimous in their concerns regarding the effectiveness of
the bureau's internal investigation procedures.

"It's a cycle," one source said regarding FBI internal protocol in filing
complaints to headquarters in Washington D.C. "You report it. It goes back
to the field office. The field office investigates it and says, 'Nope,
nothing happened.' ... Robert Hanssen investigated himself several times. He
was working counterintelligence looking for the leak who was giving
information to Russian intelligence."

"It's the fox guarding the henhouse," a second source said. "To my
knowledge, you don't have a third party doing any kind of investigation.
Unfortunately, you have a field office conducting both sides of the
investigation."

"When failures happen and abuses, there's going to be a real strong
reluctance to air that publicly," said Rowley, who was named one of Time
magazine's Persons of the Year for revealing the FBI's decision to shut down
an investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, the suspected 20th hijacker, prior
to the Sept. 11 attacks."There is a culture in all of that community - the
intelligence community - that since we're dealing with secrecy that we're
above the law."

FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., did not respond to a request for
comment. Salt Lake FBI spokeswoman Debbie Dujanovic Bertram would only say:
"We are not going to be granting an interview or responding to allegations
nor will we be discussing security policies and procedures."

Rowley says it's critical for these whistleblowers and others to come
forward with lapses that could cripple national security.

"Even if it didn't happen yet, heaven knows, next year, next month the wrong
person gets in here and says, 'Oh my gosh, I can make some money here if I
get that information out.'"

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to