<http://www.hudson-ny.org/> Hudson New York


President Obama's Mistake


by Alan M. Dershowitz <http://www.hudson-ny.org/author/Alan+M.+Dershowitz> 
May 19, 2011 at 8:11 pm

http://www.hudson-ny.org/2137/president-obama-mistake

President Obama should be commended for his emphasis on Israel's security
and his concern about Hamas joining the Palestinian Authority without
renouncing its violent charter. But he made one serious mistake that tilts
the balance against Israel in any future negotiations. Without insisting
that the Palestinians give up their absurd claim to have millions of
supposed refugees "return" to Israel as a matter of right, he insisted that
Israel must surrender all of the areas captured in its defensive war of
1967, subject only to land swaps. This formulation undercuts Security
Council Resolution 242 (which I played a very small role in helping to
draft). Resolution 242, passed unanimously by the Security Council in the
wake of Israel's 1967 victory, contemplated some territorial adjustments
necessary to assure Israel's security against future attacks. It also
contemplated that Israel would hold onto the Western Wall, the Jewish
Quarter of Jerusalem and the access roads to Hebrew University, without the
need for any land swaps. Land swaps would only be required to make up for
any areas beyond those contemplated by Resolution 242. The Obama formulation
would seem to require land swaps even for the Western Wall.

Any proposed peace agreement will require the Palestinians to give up the
so-called right of return, which is designed not for family reunification,
but rather to turn Israel into another Palestinian state with an Arab
majority. As all reasonable people know, the right of return is a
non-starter. It is used as a "card" by the Palestinian leadership who fully
understand that they will have to give it up if they want real peace. The
Israelis also know that they will have to end their occupation of most of
the West Bank (as they ended their occupation of Gaza) if they want real
peace. Obama's mistake was to insist that Israel give up its card without
demanding that the Palestinians give up theirs.

Obama's mistake is a continuation of a serious mistake he made early in his
administration. That first mistake was to demand that Israel freeze all
settlements. The Palestinian Authority had not demanded that as a condition
to negotiations. But once the President of the United States issued such a
demand, the Palestinian leadership could not be seen by its followers as
being less Palestinian than the President. In other words, President Obama
made it more difficult for the Palestinian leadership to be reasonable. Most
objective observers now recognize Obama's serious mistake in this regard.
What is shocking is that he has done it again. By demanding that Israel
surrender all the territories it captured in the 1967 war (subject only to
land swaps) without insisting that the Palestinians surrender their right of
return, the President has gone further than Palestinian negotiators had
during various prior negotiations. This makes it more difficult for the
Palestinian leadership to be reasonable in their negotiations with the
Israelis.

It is not too late for the President to "clarify" his remarks so that all
sides understand that there must be quid for quo-that the Palestinians must
surrender any right to return if the Israelis are expected to seriously
consider going back to the 1967 lines (which Abba Eban called "the Auschwitz
lines" because they denied Israel real security).

If President Obama is to play a positive role in bringing the Palestinians
and the Israelis to the negotiating table, he should insist that there be no
preconditions to negotiation. This would mean the Palestinians no longer
insisting on a settlement freeze before they will even sit down to try to
negotiate realistic borders. The President did not even ask the Palestinians
to return to the negotiating table. Nor did he ask them to drop the
condition that he, in effect, made them adopt when he earlier insisted on
the freeze.

The President missed an important opportunity in delivering his highly
anticipated speech. We are no closer to negotiations now than we were before
the speech. My fear is that we may be a bit further away as a result of the
President's one-sided insistence that Israel surrender territories without
the Palestinians giving up the right of return. I hope that Prime Minister
Netanyahu's visit to Washington may increase the chances of meaningful
negotiations. I wish I could be more optimistic but the President's speech
gave no cause for optimism. I wish it had been different because I strongly
support a two-state solution based on a willingness by Israel to surrender
territories captured in 1967 coupled with a willingness of the Palestinians
to recognize Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, to renounce
the use of violence and terrorism and to give up any right of return.

Related Topics:  Alan M. Dershowitz
<http://www.hudson-ny.org/author/Alan+M.+Dershowitz> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to