Newsmax


Dershowitz: Obama Torpedoed Peace Process


Friday, May 20, 2011 01:51 PM

By: Henry J. Reske and Kathleen Walter

President Barack Obama’s call for a negotiated peace between Israel and the
Palestinians based on the 1967 Israeli border dealt a serious blow to the
peace process and damaged the global image of the United States, Israeli
advocate and Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax.TV.

Dershowitz was commenting on Obama’s Thursday address at the State
Department in which he pressed Israel to reach a peace agreement with the
Palestinians and set the 1967 border as it existed before the Six-Day War as
a starting point. Obama’s position “hurt the peace process gravely,” he
said, adding that the president’s declaring such a marker repeated a
negotiating error that led to an earlier breakdown in talks when he insisted
on a freeze of Israeli settlements in occupied territories.

“He made the same mistake again in this speech,” Dershowitz said. “He put
himself ahead of the Palestinians. That is he insisted Israel go back to ’67
borders with land swaps, but he did not demand that the Palestinians give up
the right of return.”

Story continues below video.

 

http://www.newsmax.com/video/viewid/b4c4d2e4-7cd3-44dc-869d-64c4371f7431

The former Supreme Court law clerk and noted defense lawyer believes the
speech will have a “terrible impact” on U.S. Israeli relations and increased
the level of distrust dramatically, although “polite discourse” will
continue.

“The tragedy is during the Obama administration the prospect of peace has
gone further away than it’s ever been in recent years since Israel offered
to give the Palestinians a state . . . He’s been ham-handed in how he has
dealt with the issue of negotiations and the result is we’re further away
than ever before from negotiated peace and that’s in large part the fault of
President Obama and I think that’s the terrible tragedy of how he’s handled
this process.”

Dershowitz also maintained the speech will damage the country’s image.

“I think also the speech was not particularly good for the United States,”
he said. “It set us out in a way that showed naiveté and created a situation
where neither side will be encouraged to move toward peace by what the
president said. So I think on balance it was a net loss rather than a net
gain. And I am disappointed because I favor a two-state solution, I voted
for Obama and I was hoping he would have a more sophisticated and realistic
approach to negotiations which he doesn’t seem to have. He has twice now set
back the prospects for negations and a two state solution.”

Dershowitz also criticized how little time Obama spent on the question of
Iran and its nuclear weapons program. Obama devoted few words to the issue
in his speech, noting at one point that the United States’ “opposition to
Iran’s intolerance and Iran’s repressive measures, as well as its illicit
nuclear program and its support of terror, is well known.” 

“The thousand-pound elephant in the room that threatens Israel’s security
more than the Palestinians, or the Syrians or the Egyptians is the prospect
that Iran will develop nuclear weapons,” Dershowitz said. “Although he threw
a little bone against Iranian development of nuclear weapons he did not
guarantee Israel that Iran would not be permitted to develop nuclear
weapons. In fact he had a big statement saying Israel will have to be
prepared to defend itself alone.”

Such language increases the “distress most Israeli’s have in Obama,”
Dershowitz said.

“It would have been far better had he not make that speech than that he
included the few paragraphs he did about Israel which were ill conceived and
I think not helpful to the peace process,” he said.






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to