http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/14/anger-over-leaks-on-bin-laden-raid-in-us.html


Anger over leaks on bin Laden raid in US

AFP May 14, 2011 (5 days ago) <http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/14> 



Obama's administration gets accused of "bragging" about the raid and
divulging details that should have been kept secret. -Photo by Reuters

WASHINGTON: The White House faced criticism Friday that it had failed to
safeguard secrets about the raid on Osama bin Laden's compound and that the
leaks could jeopardize future operations.

Information about the US raid and what was found at the al Qaeda leader's
hideout in Pakistan has steadily leaked out since bin Laden was killed by at
team of Navy commandos on May 2.

CIA Director Leon Panetta was the first to reveal some details to a hungry
media, confirming that US Navy SEALs led the assault and that his spy agency
had only circumstantial proof beforehand that bin Laden was inside the
walled compound.

Citing unnamed officials, media reports soon presented a blow-by-blow
account of the operation, including identifying the SEAL unit that carried
it out, the use of a secret helicopter, the role of a CIA safe house nearby,
an estimate of the number of flash drives and hard drives found and a
plethora of details about bin Laden's correspondence.

The leaks in the Obama administration are "out of control," said Michael
Scheuer, a former CIA officer who once worked in the unit that tracked bin
Laden.

"The information about the stealth helicopters, the information about the
CIA safe house, the details about bin Laden's habits, his planning, his
contacts. All of that compromised further operations," he said.

The leaks will "make further operations harder, more difficult, probably
more bloody."

Fears that the leaks may have gone too far have triggered a round of finger
pointing in Washington, with some blaming the White House and others
suspecting members of Congress and their aides.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates, a veteran of the intelligence world and
former CIA chief, joked with a heavy dose of sarcasm Thursday that there had
been an agreement among top deputies meeting at the White House that no
details about the assault would be made public.

"Frankly a week ago Sunday, in the (White House) situation room, we all
agreed that we would not release any operational details from the effort to
take out bin Laden," Gates told an audience of Marines.

"That all fell apart on Monday, the next day."
The Pentagon chief's press secretary, Geoff Morrell, said Gates was not
criticizing any particular person or office but was worried about the effect
of divulging secrets vital to national security.

Gates "was indeed voicing his concern about the breakdown in operational
security after the killing of Bin Laden," Morrell told AFP on Friday.

"Anonymous sources revealing secret information about the tactics, training,
and equipment of covert forces put at risk our ability to successfully mount
similar missions in the future," he said.

Gates also said the government was looking at stepping up security for the
Navy SEAL team after some of the commandos expressed concerns about the
safety of their families.

The daring raid has sparked an avalanche of media interest in the secretive
SEAL "Team Six" that carried out the operation, as well as the Joint Special
Operations Command (JSOC) and its chief, Vice Admiral William McRaven, who
oversaw the assault.

A veteran of the Special Forces, Roland Guidry, a retired colonel, said "the
visibility the administration has allowed to be focused on JSOC and (the
SEALs) will make their job now more difficult."

He accused Obama's team of "bragging" about the raid and divulging details
that should have been kept secret, including what was discovered in bin
Laden's compound and how the Al-Qaeda architect communicated with his
deputies.

"The pre-mission Operational Security was superb, but the post-mission OPSEC
stinks," he told the National Journal, which first reported details of the
raid.

Details have leaked out partly because spy and law enforcement agencies
share information much more widely more than they once did, after being
heavily criticized for holding back intelligence before the September 11
attacks.

The CIA and at least nine other agencies are poring over the vast trove of
material found at the compound, and officials said information gleaned from
the review is sometimes shared across the government to help head off
possible attacks.

US intelligence officials agreed that too much had been revealed, but would
only express their concern anonymously.

"The United States Intelligence Community deplores the unauthorized
disclosure of classified information," an intelligence official said in an
email.

 
<http://www.dawn.com/2011/05/14/anger-over-leaks-on-bin-laden-raid-in-us.htm
l> 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to