Moosa and the Madrassas

by Stephen Schwartz
American Thinker
May 22, 2011

http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/moosa_and_the_madrassas.html

http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11346

At the end of a week in which U.S. military forces in Pakistan carried out the 
execution of Osama bin Laden and the Afghan Taliban declared 
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g8ISNSUg1QSsXXMx3uFzNl6JEt8A?docId=CNG.64f9c81db558e1943b01871a72b9f9c0.961>
  that the death of "Sheikh Osama bin Laden will give a new impetus to the 
current jihad against the invaders in this critical phase of jihad," a stunning 
display of Islamist insensitivity and arrogance took place at the University of 
California, Berkeley. On Friday, May 6, 2011, Ebrahim Moosa 
<http://www.campus-watch.org/search.php?cx=015692155655874064424%3A-cjrsa07xqe&cof=FORID%3A9&ie=UTF-8&q=ebrahim+moosa&sa=Search#922>
 , a South African Muslim and professor of Islamic Studies at Duke University 
in North Carolina, speaking at a UC Berkeley workshop 
<http://igov.berkeley.edu/content/religious-norms-public-sphere-rps-berkeley-workshop>
  on "Religious Norms in the Public Sphere," defended Deobandism, the 
madrassa-based radical ideology that inspires the Taliban.

The workshop was cosponsored by the Center on Institutions and Governance of UC 
Berkeley's Institute of International Studies <http://iis.berkeley.edu/> ; the 
Center for Islamic Studies 
<http://www.gtu.edu/centersandaffiliates/islamicstudies>  at its Graduate 
Theological Union; the Kadish Center <http://www.law.berkeley.edu/kadish.htm>  
for Morality, Law & Public Affairs at Berkeley Law 
<http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11269> ; the Partner University Fund 
<http://facecouncil.org/puf/> , which is supported by the French government; 
and the Social Science Research Council <http://www.ssrc.org/> .

A subdued audience of fewer than twenty people and speakers arrayed around a 
square set of long tables constituted the event, which was held at the Bancroft 
Hotel adjoining the UC Berkeley campus.

Moosa was one of the May 6 "speakers/performers 
<http://events.berkeley.edu/index.php/calendar/sn/iis?event_ID=43229&date=2011-05006&filter=Secondary%20Event%20Type&filtersel=>
 " -- a perhaps unintentionally accurate description -- as were UC Berkeley 
lecturer Hatem Bazian 
<http://www.campus-watch.org/search.php?cx=015692155655874064424%3A-cjrsa07xqe&cof=FORID%3A9&ie=UTF-8&q=hatem+bazian&sa=Search#922>
  and French Islamologist Olivier Roy 
<http://www.meforum.org/827/the-failure-of-political-islam> .

Moosa is, indeed, quite a "performer"; he has gained a reputation as an Islamic 
moderate based on his 2005 study 
<http://www.amazon.com/Ghazali-Poetics-Imagination-Civilization-Networks/dp/0807856126/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1304935835&sr=1-1>
  of the twelfth-century Muslim theologian Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali and his editing 
of the last book 
<http://www.amazon.com/Revival-Reform-Islam-Islamic-Fundamentalism/dp/185168204X/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1304936008&sr=1-2>
  of the late scholar of Islam Fazlur Rahman, of the University of Chicago.

In his "keynote lecture," Moosa reveled in a defense of Deobandism and its main 
madrassa, Dar Ul-Uloom Deoband <http://www.darululoom-deoband.com/> , located 
in India. The title of his presentation was innocuous: "Norms in the 
Madrassa-Sphere: Between Tradition, Scripture, and the Public Good." 
Nevertheless, after an introduction by GTU Islamic Studies director and 
assistant professor Munir Jiwa 
<http://www.gtu.edu/academics/faculty-directory/g-i/munir-jiwa> , Moosa made 
clear early in his presentation that his aim was to cleanse the "narrative" on 
madrassas, in which, he claimed, madrassas have been "treated in [the] media 
with dread as a threat to Western security."

Moosa gave no ground to those who would argue that many madrassas, especially 
in South Asia, are centers for radical Islamist indoctrination. He dismissed in 
a passing reference reports that Mullah Mohammed Omar, the Taliban chief for 
whose capture the U.S. government has offered a $10-million reward 
<http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/index.cfm?page=MullahOmar>  as an 
accomplice of bin Laden and al-Qaeda, was a student at Dar Ul-Uloom Deoband. 
According to Moosa, Mullah Omar's involvement with the madrassa "caused Deoband 
to be identified with the Taliban," as if the association was trivial or 
manufactured by media. In reality, the murderous extremists in Afghanistan were 
inspired by Deobandism, and Mullah Omar was not the sole alumnus of its 
madrassa system among their ranks.

According 
<http://www.amazon.com/Taliban-Militant-Islam-Fundamentalism-Central/dp/0300089023>
  to journalist Ahmed Rashid in his 2001 book, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and 
Fundamentalism in Central Asia, "at least eight Taliban cabinet ministers [...] 
were graduates of Dar Ul-Uloom Haqqania," a madrassa established in Pakistan in 
conformity with the model at Deoband in India, and "dozens more graduates 
served as Taliban governors in the provinces, military commanders, judges, and 
bureaucrats."

Treating the entire subject benevolently, Moosa declared that the Deobandi 
network had spread internationally through support from British and South 
African Muslims, as well as donations by Indian Muslim business leaders. He 
failed to mention that, as noted by Rashid, "funds from Saudi Arabia to 
madrassas and parties which were sympathetic to the Wahhabi creed" -- the most 
violent fundamentalist movement ever identified with Sunni Islam -- "as the 
Deobandis were, helped these madrassas turn out young militants."

Referring to the Deobandi history of aggression against spiritual Muslim Sufis, 
Moosa conceded that the madrassa system that spawned the Taliban was "severe" 
in its attitude. This is an understatement typical of those who try to absolve 
Islamist fundamentalists by describing them as "puritan" or "austere" and 
ignoring that their tendencies towards "Puritanism," "austerity," and even 
"reform" lead to the murder of dissenters. Moosa was equally benign in noting 
the emergence of the radical Tabligh-i-Jamaat 
<http://www.meforum.org/686/tablighi-jamaat-jihads-stealthy-legions>  da'wa 
(missionization) movement from the Deobandi environment, and in casually 
praising Yusuf Al-Qaradawi <http://www.meforum.org/646/the-qaradawi-fatwas> , 
the world-famous Islamist hate-preacher headquartered in Qatar and banned from 
entry into Britain and the U.S.

It should be noted that Moosa is himself a graduate of Deobandi theological 
training, which he recalled lyrically between comments on recondite Islamic 
theological distinctions throughout the remainder of his presentation. 
According to his website biography, Moosa "earned his M.A. (1989) and Ph.D. 
(1995) from the University of Cape Town. Prior to that, he took the 'alimiyya 
[clerical] degree in Islamic and Arabic studies from Darul Ulum Nadwatul 
'Ulama," a Deobandi campus <http://www.nadwatululama.org/>  at Lucknow, Uttar 
Pradesh, India.

Moosa was shocking -- or so one would expect in left-leaning Berkeley -- in his 
apologetic description of two controversies involving the Deobandi madrassas. 
In 1964, Muslim clerics in his native South Africa were upset when a Deobandi 
scholar held that Islamically prohibited interest, or riba, could be collected 
in Muslim business transactions in the country, because it was not a 
Muslim-majority territory. Moosa noted pleasantly that the apartheid state had 
allowed shariah-based banks and insurance companies to function without 
hindrance. The bien-pensant Berkeley audience, accustomed to the false charge 
that Israel imposes apartheid upon Arabs, was unfazed by Moosa's amiable 
approval of the tolerance for shariah under the government that invented the 
term "apartheid." Moosa's website biography also states that he "advised the 
first independent South African government after apartheid on Islamic affairs," 
yet he seemed amnesiac about the discrimination Muslims had suffered under 
South African apartheid.

The audience remained unruffled when Moosa then evoked a fatwa issued by the 
Deobandi clerics in India in the 2005 "Imrana rape case." Imrana, a resident of 
the Muzaffarnagar district in Uttar Pradesh, aged 28 and the mother of five 
children, was raped by her father-in-law, Ali Mohammad, 69. Her full name was 
never disclosed in the Indian press, but a council of five elders, or 
panchayat, in the village where she lived, Charthawal, ordered that Imrana 
separate from her husband, Nur Ilahi, because she was now the sexual partner of 
her father-in-law. That she was violated, and that her "adultery" or other 
alleged transgression was involuntary, was ignored. Imrana defied the elders 
and continued living with her husband. The Deobandi school issued a fatwa 
<http://www.milligazette.com/dailyupdate/2005/20050706b.htm>  endorsing a 
mandatory divorce but denying that such an outcome would be Islamic. Imrana's 
husband supported her and said 
<http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ali-mohammad-found-guilty-of-raping-imrana_1059246>
 , "We neither sought advice nor counsel from Deoband. We have not raised the 
issue before clerics."

The "Imrana case" caused a scandal in India, and the father-in-law was found 
guilty of rape in 2007 and sentenced to ten years in prison. Moosa described 
the abominable action of the Deobandi clerics with equanimity, adding blandly 
that they "blamed the controversy on Western media and condemned those Muslims 
who criticized them." He contributed a mild rebuke, stipulating that in the 
treatment of Imrana, Islamic law "turned into a brutal practice." He then 
returned to, and concluded with, a stream-of-consciousness commentary about the 
Deobandi concept of Islamic spirituality.

Moosa is perhaps best-known by the U.S. public for his co-authorship of a 
document 
<http://www.sanford.duke.edu/news/Schanzer_Kurzman_Moosa_Anti-Terror_Lessons.pdf>
  issued in 2010 aimed at dispelling concerns about radicalization of American 
Muslims, titled "Anti-Terror Lessons of Muslim-Americans." That report was 
financed by grant no. 2007-IJ-CX-0008, awarded by the National Institute of 
Justice, the Office of Justice Programs, and the U.S. Department of Justice, 
which also published it. Moosa's colleagues in that instance were David 
Schanzer, an associate professor at Duke's Sanford School of Public Policy, and 
Charles Kurzman, an expert on Iran and sociology professor at the University of 
North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Their intent was to demonstrate that 
self-policing by the American Muslim community had prevented the spread of 
jihadism -- an obvious inaccuracy, but their ameliorative rhetoric gained the 
dubious report considerable attention and even credibility in American media 
<http://articles.cnn.com/2010-01-06/us/muslim.radicalization.study_1_radicalization-muslim-americans-anti-terrorism?_s=PM:US>
 .

Moosa has a blog <http://ebrahimmoosa.com/>  titled "Dihliz: The Spaces 
Between," and he is a supporter of Zaytuna College 
<http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/10049> , the flamboyantly promoted 
project <http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/8787>  for a purported "first 
accredited Islamic university" in the U.S. The Zaytuna enterprise is directed 
by Moosa's friends: Hamza Yusuf Hanson, the well-known radical Muslim preacher; 
Hanson's main disciple, Zaid Shakir; and the aforementioned Hatem Bazian 
<http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/10385> , senior lecturer in UC Berkeley 
Near Eastern studies department and director of the "Islamophobia Research and 
Documentation Project <http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11269> " at the 
university's "Center for Race and Gender." With the guidance of such as Moosa, 
Hanson, and Bazian, it would seem that rather than becoming a Western-style 
university -- if it is ever realized as an institution -- Zaytuna would be a 
madrassa in the fundamentalist Deobandi tradition.

Ebrahim Moosa has received funding 
<http://fds.duke.edu/db/aas/Religion/faculty/moosa/cv.html>  from the Carnegie 
Corporation to research madrassas, and he has announced the forthcoming 
publication of a new book on the topic, to be titled What Is a Madrassa? During 
his Berkeley lecture, it seemed that neither Moosa nor his audience had 
absorbed the recent news about the death of bin Laden or the lessons of a 
decade of bloodshed caused by Wahhabi and Deobandi fanaticism in the U.S., 
Western Europe, and the South Asian and other Muslim lands. For Moosa and those 
studying under him -- about whom he bragged of his mentorship and their 
adulation -- it was as if little in radical Islam was worthy of serious 
concern, much less disapproval. He made it all seem faraway and abstract. And a 
Berkeley audience that would supposedly pride itself on its antiracism and 
feminism sat passively through his shameful "performance."

Stephen Schwartz is executive director of the  
<http://www.islamicpluralism.org/163/the-fatwa-of-38> Center for Islamic 
Pluralism. He is a UC Berkeley alumnus and was a staff writer for the San 
Francisco Chronicle from 1989 to 1999. He wrote this article for  
<http://www.campus-watch.org/> Campus Watch, a project of the  
<http://www.meforum.org/> Middle East Forum.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to