http://militarytimes.com/news/2011/05/ap-us-quietly-expanding-defense-ties-w
ith-saudis-051911/

U.S. quietly expanding defense ties with Saudis

By Robert Burns - The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday May 19, 2011 7:46:06 EDT


WASHINGTON - Despite their deepening political divide, the United States and
Saudi Arabia are quietly expanding defense ties on a vast scale, led by a
little-known project to develop an elite force to protect the kingdom's oil
riches and future nuclear sites.

The U.S. also is in discussions with Saudi Arabia to create an air and
missile defense system with far greater capability against the regional
rival the Saudis fear most, Iran. And it is with Iran mainly in mind that
the Saudis are pressing ahead with a historic $60 billion arms deal that
will provide dozens of new U.S.-built F-15 combat aircraft likely to ensure
Saudi air superiority over Iran for years.

Together these moves amount to a historic expansion of a 66-year-old
relationship that is built on America's oil appetite, sustained by Saudi
reliance on U.S. military reach and deepened by a shared worry about the
threat of al-Qaida and the ambitions of Iran.

The quiet U.S. moves in Saudi Arabia form part of the backdrop to President
Obama's speech Thursday, which is intended to put his imprint on the
enormous changes sweeping across the greater Middle East.

All of this is happening despite the Saudi government's anger at
Washington's response to uprisings across the Arab world, especially its
abandonment of Hosni Mubarak, the deposed Egyptian president who was a
longtime Saudi and U.S. ally. The Obama administration is eager to ease this
tension as it faces the prospect of an escalating confrontation with Iran
over its nuclear program.

Saudi Arabia is central to American policy in the Middle East. It is a key
player in the Arab-Israeli peace process that Obama has so far failed to
advance, and it is vital to U.S. energy security, with Saudi Arabia ranking
as the third-largest source of U.S. oil imports. It also figures prominently
in U.S. efforts to undercut Islamic extremism and promote democracy.

The forging of closer U.S.-Saudi military ties is so sensitive, particularly
in Saudi Arabia, that the Pentagon and the State Department declined
requests for on-the-record comment and U.S. officials rejected a request for
an interview with the two-star Army general, Robert G. Catalanotti, who
manages the project to build a "facilities security force" to protect the
Saudis' network of oil installations and other critical infrastructure.

The Saudi Embassy in Washington did not respond to two written requests for
comment.

Details about the elite force were learned from interviews with U.S.
officials speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of
Saudi security concerns, as well as in interviews with private analysts and
public statements by former U.S. officials.

The special security force is expected to grow to at least 35,000 members,
trained and equipped by U.S. personnel as part of a multiagency effort that
includes staff from the Justice Department, Energy Department and Pentagon.
It is overseen by the U.S. Central Command.

The force's main mission is to protect vital oil infrastructure, but its
scope is wider. A formerly secret State Department cable released by the
WikiLeaks website described the mission as protecting "Saudi energy
production facilities, desalination plants and future civil nuclear
reactors."

The cable dated Oct. 29, 2008, and released by WikiLeaks in December said
the Saudis agreed to a U.S. recommendation to create the program after they
received an Energy Department briefing on the vulnerability of certain oil
facilities.

The program apparently got under way in 2009 or 2010, but it is not clear
how much of the new force is operating.

The Saudis' security worries were heightened by a failed al-Qaida car
bombing in February 2006 of the Abqaiq oil processing facility, one of the
largest in the world. The State Department cable said a subsequent U.S.
assessment of Abqaiq security standards determined that it remained "highly
vulnerable to other types of sophisticated terrorist attacks." That warning
was conveyed to top Saudi officials on Oct. 27, 2008.

"The Saudis remain highly concerned about the vulnerability of their energy
production facilities," the cable said. "They recognize many of their energy
facilities remain at risk from al-Qaida and other terrorists who seek to
disrupt the global economy."

One U.S. official said the Saudi force's mission might be expanded to
include protection of embassies and other diplomatic buildings, as well as
research and academic installations. The official spoke on condition of
anonymity because of the diplomatic sensitivity of the issue.

The newly established specialized force is separate from the regular Saudi
military and is also distinct from Saudi Arabian National Guard, an internal
security force whose mission is to protect the royal family and the Muslim
holy places of Mecca and Medina. The U.S. has had a training and advising
role with the regular Saudi military since 1953 and began advising the
National Guard in 1973.

The new arrangement is based on a May 2008 deal signed by then-Secretary of
State Condoleezza Rice and Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef. That same
month the U.S. and Saudi Arabia also signed an understanding on civil
nuclear energy cooperation in which Washington agreed to help the Saudis
develop nuclear energy for use in medicine, industry and power generation.

In October 2008, Ford Fraker, then the U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia,
called the facilities security force program "probably the single biggest
initiative for the U.S.-Saudi relationship" and said the value of contracts
associated with the program could reach tens of billions of dollars.

Christopher Blanchard, a Middle East policy analyst at the Congressional
Research Service, said the arrangement is important on multiple levels.

"The noteworthy thing is that it's such a sensitive area," he said in an
interview. "It's probably the most sensitive area for the Saudis, in the
sense that those facilities are the lifeblood of the kingdom."

"It's not only about defending against a single military threat like Iran
but also an expression, politically and symbolically, of a U.S. commitment
to Saudi Arabia's long-term security," he added. "It's about seeing the
U.S.-Saudi relationship into the next generation."

The U.S. had dozens of combat aircraft based in Saudi Arabia from 1991 to
2003. When the planes departed, the U.S. turned over a highly sophisticated
air operations center it had built in the desert south of Riyadh.

The U.S.-Saudi relationship has been rocked by a series of setbacks,
including the 9/11 attacks in which 15 of the 19 hijackers turned out to be
Saudis. Saudi Arabia also is the birthplace of Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaida
leader killed by U.S. Navy SEALs on May 2 in Pakistan, and Saudis remain
active in al-Qaida in Afghanistan. U.S. officials said this month a Saudi
considered the No. 1 terrorist target in eastern Afghanistan, Abu Hafs
al-Najdi, was killed in an airstrike. They said he helped organize al-Qaida
finances.

Even so, Saudi Arabia has become one of Washington's most valued
counterterrorism partners. It also is a top client for U.S. arms. When
Defense Secretary Robert Gates visited Riyadh in April, he reaffirmed U.S.
intentions to proceed with the deal announced last fall to sell up to $60
billion in weaponry, including 84 F-15s and the upgrading of 70 existing
Saudi F-15s.

U.S. officials said the arms deal might be expanded to include naval ships
and possibly more advanced air and missile defense systems. The Saudis want
to upgrade their Patriot air defenses to the latest U.S. version, which can
knock down short-range ballistic missiles in flight. And they have expressed
interest in a more capable system designed to defend against higher-flying,
medium-range missiles.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to