http://sheikyermami.com/2011/05/22/the-u-s-must-pay-the-jizya/


The U.S. Must Pay the Jizya


by sheikyermami on May 22, 2011

I beg to differ. We must not. But  Richard Butrick
<http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.co
m/blog/2011/05/the_us_must_pay_the_jizya.html> tells us why he thinks we
must:

The jizya is a tax that infidels (non-Muslims) must pay in order not to be
brutalized by Allah's chosen.

Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold forbidden
that which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge
the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until
they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. Qur
<http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/q
uran/009.qmt.html%20/%20009.029> 'an 9:29

 <http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/terrorist-change.jpg>
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/terrorist-change.jpgIt is
basically a protection racket.  Think Mafia run by religious zealots.  In
this case, as President Obama sees it, in order not to suffer terrible
disruption ("a deepening
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/text-of-president-obamas-speech-on-t
he-middle-east-and-north-africa/2011/05/19/AFuSQK7G_story_2.html>  spiral of
division") by justifiably irate Muslims, the U.S. must pay up.  It is part
of the Obama Doctrine: billions for tribute but not one more cent for
defense.

Justifiable anger?  Invasion of Arab lands, stealing Arab oil, propping up
the Shah.  Drawing cartoons of Mohammed. Pope rage. Koran rage.  The list
goes on.

This is Obama's jizya plan
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/text-of-president-obamas-speech-on-t
he-middle-east-and-north-africa/2011/05/19/AFuSQK7G_story_2.html>  to
placate our Arab overlords: forgive up to $1 billion in debt Egypt owes the
U.S.  Secure $1 billion in loan guarantees for the region from the
International Monetary Fund.  Secure more billions from the World Bank and
the European Bank for "reconstruction and development" - the Europeans must
pay their fair share of jizya.  Then, of course, throw an ally or two under
the bus.  What's a little lost sovereignty and betrayal of allies for some
peace of mind?  As Caroline Glick
<http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/20/obamas_speech_imperils
_us_interests_109938.html>  puts it:

Beyond his abandonment of Bahrain and Yemen, in claiming that the US mustn't
distinguish between its allies and its foes, Obama made clear that he has
renounced the US's right to have and pursue national interests. If you can't
favor your allies against your enemies then you cannot defend your national
interests. And if you cannot defend your national interests then you
renounce your right to have them.

That should mollify our Arab overlords.  Although Obama might have to make
another Middle East Apology Tour
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124044156269345357.html>  and show us that
cute little curtsy of his.

I bet that's just the tip of the iceberg:

Islamic charities from Saudi Arabia and UAE giving $100 million yearly to
jihad in Pakistan
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/05/islamic-charities-from-saudi-arabia-and-u
ae-giving-100-million-yearly-to-jihad-in-pakistan.html> 

And where is that money coming from? From our gas pumps. And note here again
the connection to Islamic charities. This should not surprise anyone: in
Islam, funding jihad is a meritorious, charitable act.

"'Pakistani jihad networks funded by Saudi, UAE charities,'" from Reuters
<http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=221641> , May 22 (thanks
to JW):

Islamic charities from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates financed a
network in US ally Pakistan that recruited children as young as eight to
wage holy war, a Pakistani newspaper reported on Sunday, citing Wikileaks.

A US diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks said financial support
estimated at $100 million a year was making its way from those Gulf Arab
states to a jihadist recruitment network in Pakistan's Punjab province, Dawn
newspaper reported.

The November 2008 dispatch by Bryan Hunt, the then principal officer at the
US consulate in Lahore, was based on discussions with local government and
non-governmental sources during trips to Punjab, Pakistan's most populous
province.

It said those sources claimed that financial aid from Saudi and United Arab
Emirates was coming from "missionary" and "Islamic charitable" organizations
ostensibly with the direct support of those countries' governments..

But militancy is deeply rooted in Pakistan. In order to eradicate it,
analysts say, the government must improve economic conditions to prevent
militants from recruiting young men disillusioned with the state.

The network in Punjab reportedly exploited worsening poverty to indoctrinate
children and ultimately send them to training camps, said the cable.

 

The idea that poverty causes terrorism has been refuted again and again, but
unfortunately the fact that the connection is made in a cable like this only
means that the solution will be to pour more money into Pakistan.
Ironically, that money will also be used to fund jihad, not to fight against
it.

Saudi Arabia, home to the fundamentalist Wahhabi brand of Islam, is seen as
funding some of Pakistan's hardline religious seminaries, or madrassas,
which churn out young men eager for holy war, posing a threat to the
stability of the region."At these madrassas, children are denied contact
with the outside world and taught sectarian extremism, hatred for
non-Muslims, and anti-Western/anti-Pakistan government philosophy," said the
cable.

It described how "families with multiple children" and "severe financial
difficulties" were being exploited and recruited, Dawn reported.

"The path following recruitment depends upon the age of the child involved.
Younger children (between 8 and 12) seem to be favored," said the cable.

Teachers in seminaries would assess the inclination of children "to engage
in violence and acceptance of jihadi culture".

"The initial success of establishing madrassas and mosques in these areas
led to subsequent annual "donations" to these same clerics, originating in
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates," the cable stated.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to