http://www.creators.com/conservative/brent-bozell.html 

                

No One May Lecture Obama


 

When Barack Obama replaced George Bush, there was unbridled joy among the 
elites. The days of "cowboy diplomacy" were over! Finally, we had a president 
who was a careful multi-lateralist who wouldn't rudely impose his will, but 
would instead work with allies to build consensus.

But that's not what Obama delivered with Israel last week, is it? Obama went to 
the State Department and insisted Israel needed to stop its "unsustainable" 
policy toward the Palestinians and "boldly" retreat behind pre-1967 borders. A 
stunned Benjamin Netanyahu responded as any ally would if so roundly betrayed. 
He publicly — correctly — denounced Obama's policy prescription.

Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic magazine (and website) posted an item on May 
20 headlined: "Dear Mr. Netanyahu, Please Don't Speak to My President That 
Way." Netanyahu, he wrote, threw a "hissy fit." That pretty much encapsulated 
the American media's reaction. "Cowboy diplomacy" is just fine from time to 
time — if the man in the saddle is Obama.

On that night's "NBC Nightly News," reporter Andrea Mitchell was finding 
anonymous distaste for Netanyahu from other Israeli officials, never mind that 
his country was unquestionably applauding him. 

"I was told that even some Israeli officials, David, were uncomfortable with 
what they acknowledge was a lecturing tone by the prime minister. But he felt 
very strongly he had to say this to the world, to President Obama's face."

By the time Sunday's " 
<http://sz0056.wc.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/public/blank.html> Meet the Press" 
rolled around, Mitchell heightened the attack on Netanyahu for daring to 
lecture the Almighty Barack.

"Netanyahu seized on it. Even before he got on the plane, he criticized the 
president, and in such a  
<http://sz0056.wc.mail.comcast.net/zimbra/public/blank.html> fashion! He 
lectured him in the Oval Office. And if you look at that picture that you have 
up there right now, it was a stone-faced Barack Obama and Netanyahu basically 
treating him like a schoolboy."

And then, some more anonymity: "People even who work for Netanyahu, some 
Israeli officials, told him later that he went too far. That it was, it was 
really rude and that there would be blowback to this."

Mitchell's NBC sure was less outraged when Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez came 
to the U.N. in 2006 and denounced President Bush as a devil.

Kelly O'Donnell was downright blase: "Chavez repeatedly called the president 'a 
devil' and labeled him a 'Yankee terrorist.' The administration quickly 
dismissed the swipe.

        

... And some say that the Venezuelan president cannot be so easily ignored 
because he has so much oil." 

The next day, Matt Lauer turned to a set of VH-1 comedians. He played the 
Chavez devil clip, and said, "That's wacky." 

Sherrod Small replied, "I ain't laughed that much at a Latino guy on TV since I 
watched Telemundo. He's got what it takes." 

Jessica St. Clair added: "He's saying what everybody wants to say, and so now 
we love him."

Thanks, NBC, for always standing up for our president, regardless of party.

How about when that idiot Iraqi journalist threw a shoe at President Bush's 
head in December 2008, screaming, "This is your goodbye (present), you dog"? On 
NBC's "Today," reporter Richard Engel excused the shoe-tosser because he had 
relatives killed in Baghdad. 

Reporter Chuck Todd went further, virtually endorsing the Bush insult, saying 
that "in our last poll we had 80 percent said they wouldn't miss him," and 
"He's already being sort of kicked out of office by the American people."

The other networks were even worse. ABC's "World News" put "Folk Hero?" on 
screen as anchor Elizabeth Vargas trumpeted this "instant celebrity to many of 
his countrymen." Then-employed and more perky CBS anchor Katie Couric hailed 
how "many Iraqis are calling him a hero." Reporter Elizabeth Palmer snidely 
concluded the man "should do jail time, said the Iraqi bloggers, because he 
missed."

Did anyone disagree with Obama's position on Israel? Apparently not, if we are 
to trust the press. None of the network morning shows found critics of Obama's 
remarks on Israel. CBS's "Early Show" instead turned to former Clinton State 
Department spokesman Jamie Rubin.

Anchor Erica Hill suggested Netanyahu couldn't "give an inch" politically to 
the president on Israeli security. Rubin replied: "This is unfortunate for 
everyone, I think. Because President Obama doesn't have the huge popularity in 
Israel that, perhaps, President Bush had, it's easier for Prime Minister 
Netanyahu to have a fight with him."

CBS's liberal guest insisted it was "unfortunate for everyone" that Obama 
wasn't more popular in Israel, with the clear implication that he should be. 
Our media feel Obama's pain so intensely that they can't bear the thought that 
someone would say an unkind word to him, especially with their cameras rolling. 
Their outrage at Netanyahu is only a small indicator of how much they're going 
to hate Obama's Republican opponents in the months to come.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out 
more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate 
writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at 
www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to