<http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/> Daniel Greenfield article: Scarecrow
Empires and Broken Alliances 
 
<http://fusion.google.com/add?source=atgs&feedurl=http://feeds.feedburner.co
m/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews>
cid:[email protected]

        
  _____  


 
<http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindT
heNews/~3/PPwhIGyeD7U/scarecrow-empires-and-broken-alliances.html?utm_source
=feedburner&utm_medium=email> Scarecrow Empires and Broken Alliances

Posted: 24 May 2011 08:18 PM PDT

Prime Minister Netanyahu's address to congress was less about the contents
of his speech and more about the familiarity. Like Tony Blair, he was
startlingly at home here. His presence an instinctive reminder of an
alliance based on commonality and fellowship, weighed against the
realpolitik of multinationalism. The warmth in his tone countering the cold
counsel of foreign policy hands demanding more pressure.

 
<http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8diKS4LTgAc/TdxzQR5I-OI/AAAAAAAAEvw/xNyHwsH_VIk/s
1600/onet.jpg> cid:[email protected]

The chilly reception that Gordon Brown and Benjamin Netanyahu received on
their visits from the Obama Administration are post-modern fracture points
in the old friendships. The instinctive kinship that Blair and Netanyahu
called on are completely alien to Obama who feels far more warmth toward
Egypt or Indonesia, than England and Israel. But Obama's foreignness to the
old traditions is only a small fracture point in the larger break.

The US and EU have become empires without an empire, obsessively trying to
maintain a world order based on multinational alliances and international
law. The transition of Russia and China to capitalist states has eliminated
any need for the order as a counterweight to Communism. Instead through such
organizations as the United Nations, where the majority vote means global
mob rule, the blade of the order is turning against the alliance of nations
that founded it.

The obsession with creating a Palestinian Arab state, in a region already
chock full of Sunni Arab states, is not about peace with Israel. It's about
pacifying restive Muslim populations around the world and inside Europe. The
countries that are most bent on breaking up Israel, have sizable Muslim
minorities, business interests in the Middle East and concerns about
terrorism. 

The British Empire went full circle from endorsing a Jewish state, to
fighting against it tooth and nail, even using its own commanders as
mercenaries on the Arab side. The reasoning was the same then as it is now.
Maintaining British influence in the region would be easier without having a
Jewish state there to upset the Dar Al Islam.

Every Western foreign policy apparatus is dominated by the same view, that
to consolidate and stabilize the Middle East, the 'one problem country' in
the region must go. Or at least be diminished. Kissinger demanded that
Israel lose a war to the Arabs in order to boost their self-esteem. Then
Carter demanded that Israel give up the land in exchange for a treaty that
the current Egyptian government has torn up. Since then presidents have
pushed Israel to create a Palestinian Muslim state. Now that it has been all
but created, more concessions are being demanded. And when the negotiations
inevitably fail-- Israel is held to blame.

Very little of this has to do with 'peace' in the popular understanding.
There are global conflicts going on all the time. Most of them far bloodier
than anything in Gaza or the West Bank. These conflicts rarely make it to
the front pages of newspapers or lead to boycotts and protests. Compared to
the actions of Indonesia or Turkey-- nothing that goes on in Israel should
get this level of attention. That it does is really not about Israel. It's
about the Muslim world.

The global hegemony needs regional stability, even as it has less ability to
enforce it. Armed assaults to remove governments in Iraq and Libya have
stretched the resources of the US and the EU. And such nation building
projects have been shown to be futile. The current push for digital
democracy is even more hopeless, rewarding insurgent factions at the expense
of established governments, without breaking the cycle of violence and
tyranny in any way.

The US and the EU can't force the Muslim world to behave itself. Instead
they pursue stability the mirage of regional stability by doing their
bidding. Cracking the whip over Israel is cheap. All it requires is
political and economic pressure on a single country. Which is a lot easier
than applying pressure to the 57 Muslim states of the OIC to rein in
terrorism and give their people a better life. Given a choice between
untying the Islamic knot or chopping up Israel, the choice is simple enough.

The same worldview that demands Israel partition itself, also calls for a
Ground Zero Mosque, enforced Ramadan fasting for non-Muslims and a thousand
other 'accommodations' all in the name of peace. Sooner or later we will ban
burning the Koran, not because there's any Constitutional basis, but because
we're still trying to keep all the pieces of a sprawling angry world
together. And individual freedoms and alliances don't matter in the face of
that urgent chaos.

While Netanyahu came to Washington D.C. to remind Americans of friendship--
that friendship is mostly unwanted here except around election time.
American and European leaders have been focused on reaching out to the
Muslim world and convincing them that we are their friends. And that they
should be our friends. This pathetic show of appeasement is an attempt to
build links and avoid the inevitable conflict with an ascendant Islam. Even
though such a Clash of Civilizations remains unavoidable. 

The US and EU, without their old military and economic might at their
disposal, are falling back on the goodwill of the Muslim world. Pity the
Muslim world doesn't have much of that. The entire farce of Pakistani
cooperation in the War on Terror fell apart in a single day. It might just
as easily have been Saudi cooperation or that of half a dozen other Muslim
states. None of them are committed to fighting terrorism beyond the point
where it threatens them.

While the Western multinational alliance dreams of a stable world order, the
Muslim world knows that stability is an illusion. That violence is
constantly present and has to be directed and channeled. The paradoxical
relationship between Muslim governments and Muslim terrorists is defined by
this need of regimes to channel the violence away from themselves. It's a
Push-Pull relationship as governments offer limited support for the
terrorists to carry on their war somewhere else, while the terrorists pull
back home to overthrow the government. The closest Muslim countries can come
to stability is to maintain a balance of terror between all the internal
factions. And that balance can only be met through ruthless repression or
international terrorism. 

The view of Israel as a disruptive force in the region has always been
wrong. It has actually helped stabilize its enemies by giving them an outlet
for their violence. This is a role that Jews have played for thousands of
years as regional minorities. Whipping boys in popular uprisings and
political instability. That is the role that Israel now plays for both the
Muslim world and the West. But the whipping boy is a proxy for abuse.
Beating him is a way to avoid dealing with the real problem. The Muslim
world remains incapable of dealing with its problems. And Western political
elites continue to live in denial about their own dream of a united world
order.

But the foreign policy model of the US and the EU focuses on creating
stability by removing destabilizing forces. But their attempts to damage
Israel and remove Arab dictators actually bleeds away whatever regional
stability existed, and replaces it with chaos. That is an apt description of
the aftereffects of such experiments in Cairo, Baghdad or the Palestinian
Authority. The US and EU cannot stabilize the Muslim world. They can only
destabilize it further.

American politicians may talk the pro-Israel talk when running for office,
but once they get elected, they find themselves walking in the pro-Islamic
direction of a foreign policy establishment which blames Israel for
disrupting the prospects for peace, radicalizing Muslim populations and
impeding an East-West alliance. But this view is not only false, it's based
on an unnecessary need to maintain a global order.

The end of the Cold War means that there is no longer a practical need for
this scarecrow empire that the US and EU foreign policy establishments
insist on maintaining. If the UN and the IMF and the rest of the tawdry
bureaucracy wants to maintain a global order based on greed and mob rule,
they're welcome to it. But there is no need for the United States or England
or Germany to provide them with the backing to do it. The fiction of
international law has unraveled a long time ago. Human rights exist only in
countries where they are enforced by local laws, not international ones.

 
<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AD2XF2Ofgz0/Tdx0f31ik2I/AAAAAAAAEv4/6sp2Y3aDF4g/s
1600/obama-at-un1.jpg>
cid:[email protected]

Communism could be checkmated by an international alliance, but no
international alliance that includes Muslim countries and their enablers can
checkmate Islam. They certainly can't checkmate that boojum known as radical
Islam, which is an expression of political and religious factions within the
Muslim world that has always been there and will always be there.

The left insists on shattering the old alliances, but they have nothing to
replace them with. Their war on Israel is equally misguided. Their
post-American order is already rotten through and through. Like Blair's
speech to congress, Netanyahu's address is a reminder of a different road
that is being abandoned. Alliances based not on global orders, but on
friendship and the fellowship of kin cultures. A warmth that is lacking in
the hollow charades of the UN and the endless peacekeeping and aid missions
to the hopeless. The vision of a global order is already dead. If such an
order emerges it will not be based on liberal values or international law,
but on Islam.

It's time to take down the scarecrow empires, forget one world governments
and international laws, and rebuild the old alliances once again.

cid:[email protected]

 
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:yIl2AUoC8zA>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:I9og5sOYxJI>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:63t7Ie-LG7Y>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:7Q72WNTAKBA>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:V_sGLiPBpWU>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:UT3xtbGYFzA>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:gIN9vFwOqvQ>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:4cEx4HpKnUU>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:cGdyc7Q-1BI>
cid:[email protected]
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehind
TheNews?a=PPwhIGyeD7U:yDC733u3YrE:qj6IDK7rITs>
cid:[email protected]

cid:[email protected]

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to