http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/libyans-robbed-our-own-bank-
to-fund-uprising/2011/05/24/AFAPZhAH_story.html?nl_headlines

 


Libyans 'robbed our own bank' to fund uprising


By Sudarsan Raghavan
<http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/articles/sudarsan+raghavan/>  and
James V. Grimaldi, Published: May 24


BENGHAZI, Libya - In the days after Libya's rebels rose up against Moammar
Gaddafi, they faced a vexing challenge: How do you pay for a revolution?

They figured that part of the answer could be found inside the secure vaults
of the Benghazi branch of the Central Bank of Libya, where Gaddafi's
government held about $505 million. And they decided the money should be
theirs because they believed it belonged to the Libyan people.

So they broke in and took it.

"Let me put it this way: We robbed our own bank," said Ali Tarhouni, the
rebels' U.S.-educated finance minister, who ordered the March heist.

By drilling a hole in a wall and hiring a locksmith to play with a safe's
combination, rebel leaders turned the Gaddafi government's money into the
lifeblood of their uprising. Now they are trying to do much the same thing
on an international scale, asking foreign governments - including the United
States - to use seized Libyan assets to fund a rebellion that in three
months has evolved from political protest into a protracted military
showdown.

On Tuesday, the United States emphasized its support for the rebels by
asking them to open an office in Washington, a gesture just short of formal
recognition. Late Tuesday, NATO warplanes pounded Gaddafi targets in Tripoli
- part of an air campaign that has kept alive the rebels' hopes of one day
taking control of the capital. But as the rebels struggle to fund their
fight, the United States and other Western powers have done little to help
them financially. 

The Obama administration and Congress have been deadlocked over giving rebel
leaders any of the $32 billion in Libyan assets frozen
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sanctions-in-72-hours-how-the-
us-pulled-off-a-major-freeze-of-libyan-assets/2011/03/11/ABBckxJB_story.html
>  in U.S. accounts. Even using the money to provide humanitarian aid to
those affected by the conflict is legally complex
<http://www.cfr.org/libya/using-frozen-assets-aid-libyans/p24945> . 

"This is a tough issue," said Jeffrey D. Feltman, assistant secretary of
state for Near Eastern and North African affairs, speaking to reporters in
Benghazi. "These are assets that we're holding in custodianship for the
service of the Libyan people, and we're looking at how we might address the
humanitarian needs."

The White House has asked the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to draft a
bill to take a portion of the frozen assets
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/us-to-free-up-frozen-libyan-funds-fo
r-humanitarian-aid/2011/05/05/AFEsyO1F_story.html>  - $150 million to $180
million - and put it to use in Libya as humanitarian aid. But the
legislation faces stiff opposition from Sen. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.), who
has serious concerns about the "ramifications of taking the funds of what is
still another sovereign nation," said Lugar spokesman Mark Helmke. 

Lugar and other lawmakers are concerned about U.S. involvement in a Libyan
civil war and the administration's lack of consultation with Congress. "If
the Obama administration wants to spend more taxpayer money and possible
American blood, it has to consult with Congress on the ways and means of
this war," Helmke said.

As the administration and Congress bicker, the rebels say they are running
dangerously low on funds. They have asked for pledges of up to $3 billion in
loans and aid, and they have received substantial promises from Kuwait,
Qatar and others. But international assistance has come up far short of what
the rebels say they need. 

Feltman said the United States has given $53.5 million to address Libya's
humanitarian needs and $25 million in "nonlethal military supply." He
assured rebel leaders of more assistance in the weeks ahead.

But for now, the rebels continue to make do largely with the money they
swiped from Gaddafi's bank. 

Officials in the United States and other countries have sidestepped
questions about the legality of the rebels' decision to help themselves to
state funds. One banking specialist said that's probably because the
legitimacy of the Gaddafi government
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/gaddafi-says-he-is-beyond-natos-reach/2
011/05/13/AFuDx12G_story.html>  has been openly questioned in the wake of
the government's deadly crackdown on Libya's own citizens.

"It's not the same as narco-traffickers stealing from the Federal Reserve.
That would be criminal," said John Byrne, a banking expert and executive
vice president of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering
Specialists. "These are rebels operating against a regime that we oppose,
fighting for their people." 

Tarhouni, 60, who until earlier this year was a low-key economics lecturer
at the University of Washington
<http://www.washington.edu/news/articles/uw-faculty-member-ali-tarhouni-name
d-finance-minister-by-libyan-opposition-1>  at Seattle, said the bank heist
serves as an illustration of the rebels' ingenuity, wherewithal and
organizational skills. It's proof, he said, that they are ready to run the
nation.

Bank managers helped with the break-in. But they could not get into one of
the vaults because three separate keys were required - and they had only
two, said Ahmed el-Sharif, a former consultant to the Central Bank of Libya,
whom the rebels briefly appointed as the bank's governor in April.

Sharif and three other bank managers brought in a locksmith, and on March
29, they drilled a hole in the wall so the locksmith could tinker with the
safe's combination. 

"From inside, you can play with the combination, and he just neutralized the
third key, which is in Tripoli, and we opened with two keys," Sharif said.

Their success was bittersweet. 

When Tarhouni saw the cash, he said, his first thought was, "I am in
trouble. That's not enough to run an economy in a war."

The money - more than $500 million spread between two safes - stayed in the
bank, placed in a new rebel account, Sharif said. Efforts to supplement
those funds with oil revenue have been unsuccessful, and the rebel authority
lacks the infrastructure to raise taxes. 

The cash has been used to pay government salaries and operational expenses,
as well as for food subsidies. In recent weeks, more money has been spent
because the rebels are supporting the western city of Misurata and other
towns that are under siege, Tarhouni said. 

For now, Tarhouni and the rebels are still relying on the remaining funds
from the central bank - roughly 150 million Libyan dinars, or $120 million,
according to Sharif. 

"I've been using this money in an almost magical way to run the economy,"
Tarhouni said. "We needed to use this money to give it back to the people,
to feed the people."

But aware that the money won't last much longer, Tarhouni is hunting for the
really big sums that Gaddafi and his government placed in banks, investment
firms, hedge funds and other institutions across the globe. Tarhouni
estimates that the assets could be worth as much as $165 billion.

Alternatively, Tarhouni has proposed using the frozen funds as collateral
for a line of credit or a loan. Earlier this month, Tarhouni, senior
opposition leader Mahmoud Jibril and a delegation visited Washington and
appealed to U.S. Treasury officials, the White House and congressional
leaders, hoping to get at least $3
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/libyas-rebel-government-ask
s-for-3-billion-in-international-loans/2011/05/03/AFdADVjF_story.html>
billion to run the rebel-held portion of Libya for six months.

Tarhouni described that amount as "bare-bones." 

"Our situation is very critical," he said. "We're still in a war. So if you
think we are a legitimate voice, if you think we are a legitimate cause, and
the world agrees we are fighting a killer thug, and that this is a
legitimate revolution, then help us out.

"We're just asking to use our own resources."

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to