http://www.hstoday.us/single-article/experts-weigh-likely-terror-attacks-fut
ure-of-al-qaeda-after-death-of-bin-laden/4697000ae4d46a8d857018c25e40293c.ht
ml

 

Experts Weigh Likely Terror Attacks, Future of Al Qaeda after Death of Bin
Laden 

By: Mickey McCarter

05/26/2011 (12:00am)

 

 

Authorities should prepare for a higher short-term threat to the US homeland
after the death of Osama bin Laden but the long-term outlook for al Qaeda is
weakening, experts told the House Homeland Security Committee Wednesday.

Rep. Peter King (R-NY), chair of the committee, opened the hearing with
reflections that many people think the war on terrorism is over now that bin
Laden has been killed by US forces. 

"In the short run, the threat is probably greater than it was. Long-term
there is no doubt the death of bin Laden is positive for so many reasons,"
King said, drawing agreement from a panel of experts.

In the short term, operatives from al Qaeda and its affiliates likely will
attack American resources to avenge the death of bin Laden, said Frances
Townsend, former counter-terrorism advisor to President George W. Bush.

But the United States also must maintain homeland security capabilities in
the long term, warned Townsend, now a senior vice president at MacAndrews
and Forbes Holdings Inc.

"Capability is built over time. As we found in the immediate after 9/11, it
cannot be quickly reacquired after a crisis," Townsend stated.

While al Qaeda would find it difficult to attack the United States on the
scale of an attack similar to 9/11 due to defenses built up over the past 10
years, it still will aspire to smaller scale attacks, she said.

Townsend emphasized that al Qaeda has remained obsessed with attacking
transportation systems and the United States has not been spending enough on
rail security in response to the terrorist organization's track record of
attacking mass transit systems. 

The United States also has not strengthened cargo security to the degree
that it should, Townsend said.

Overseas, the United States must "must re-evaluate our relationship with
Pakistan but we must carefully consider the alternatives and consequences of
partnership with Pakistan," Townsend stated. As Pakistan has become a
nuclear state, instability in the country could result in terrorists
obtaining a nuclear weapon -- a worst-case scenario for US national
security.

Lee Hamilton, former vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, stressed that a
terrorist attack would come from core al Qaeda or one of its affiliates to
avenge bin Laden's death but such an attack could happen at any time.

"Al Qaeda and its affiliates will almost certainly attempt to avenge him.
They will not necessarily attack soon. The threat from al Qaeda is more
diverse and more complex than ever -- although less severe than the
catastrophic proportions of the 9/11 attacks. It continues to hope to
inflict mass casualties in the United States," Hamilton said in written
testimony.

The intelligence gained from the raid on bin Laden's compound on May 2, when
Navy SEALs shot him dead, likely will produce valuable information on al
Qaeda targets, which the United States must protect, said Hamilton, now
co-chair of the Bipartisan Policy Center's National Security Preparedness
Group.

Townsend and Hamilton also called upon the administration and Congress to
agree on comprehensive immigration reform, casting legislation to provide
legal status to illegal immigrants seeking economic opportunities in the
United States as a necessity so that the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) can focus its resources on active national security threats.

Essentially, Border Patrol and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement should
spend more of its time attempting to deal with illegal immigrants and
smugglers outside of economic migrants coming from Latin America, Townsend
and Hamilton suggested.

Evan Kohlmann of Flashpoint Global Partners urged policymakers to focus more
on monitoring or breaking up jihadist activity on the Internet.

Companies that host material from al Qaeda and its affiliates or other
radicals unintentionally support the goals of terrorism, Kohlmann argued.
The United States should put more pressure on these companies to close down
terrorist forums and remove recruiting materials and the like from the Web.

Future of al Qaeda

Townsend described al Qaeda as engaged in an internal conflict over who
should lead the organization after bin Laden. No permanent new leader of the
organization has emerged, highlighting that the terrorists lacked a
succession plan in the event of bin Laden's death. 

"The chaos at the top of al Qaeda is an important targeting opportunity for
the United States," Townsend stated, noting that authorities could trace
terrorist chatter and strike against the organization while it was mostly
leaderless.

Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) remains the most active threat to
the United States, however, demonstrating its ability to strike at the US
homeland by supporting the Fort Hood massacre in 2009, the Christmas Day
bomber in 2009, and the toner cartridge cargo attack in 2010, Townsend said.

Anwar al-Awlaki, APAQ's leader, has been an active threat due to his ability
to speak in colloquial English to extremists who would attack the United
States, the experts agreed. Material connected to al-Awlaki has been
uncovered in every homegrown terrorism case investigated in the United
States, asserted Kohlmann.

The Pakistan Taliban also remains a threat for its interest in training and
equipping lone wolf attackers like Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad,
Townsend added.

The death of bin Laden is the most significant achievement in the war on
terror, Hamilton said, involving unprecedented cooperation between military
and intelligence forces. 

"The raid took hard work, cooperation, vigilance, and tenacity, over a
period of years," he said. "It involved surveillance, analysis of many bits
of information, interceptions, and the extraordinary skills of our Special
Operations Forces. The CIA and the military worked together seamlessly. The
raid was a culmination of intense and tireless efforts on the part of many
dedicated national security personnel over a period of many years."

The successful raid clearly resulted from reforms produced from efforts such
as the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law
108-45), Hamilton declared.

But Hamilton cautioned, "Although Osama bin Laden is dead, al Qaeda is not
-- it is a network, not a hierarchy. Over a period of years, al Qaeda has
been very adaptive and resilient. Bin Laden's death is certainly a setback
for al Qaeda but likely not its demise."

It's next likely leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri, does not have the charisma or
leadership skills of bin Laden, who commanded great personal loyalty
throughout the terrorist organization, Hamilton said. Still, "[w]e should
not underestimate Zawahiri. He is extremely pious, ruthless; he is not a
lightweight; he has been instrumental in al Qaeda's strategy, development,
and evolution over a period of years," he said.

Although al-Awlaki is likely to remain a threat as head of APAQ, he is
unlikely to rise further in the al Qaeda ranks, predicted Peter Bergen,
national security studies director at the New America Foundation.

Al-Awlaki cannot change the strategic intent of al Qaeda, Bergen
characterized. He is an effective English speaker, but he is not a
particularly powerful military or religious figure.

APAQ could attempt to extend its reach through an alliance with al-Shabaab
in Africa, but any attacks on which the two organizations collaborate would
likely remain limited to the Middle East or Africa and not reach the US
homeland directly, Bergen said.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to