http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9603/pub_detail.asp

 

May 26, 2011


In Tehran the Fight is Over Money


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.119/author_detail.asp>
Amir Taheri

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110525_EsfandiarrRahimMashai.j
pg

 

Esfandiar Rahim Masha'i (Mashei) named by Iranian mullahs as the “dangerous
character” who leads the “deviant tendency.”

 

Under the Khomeinist regime, Iran's media have developed a grammar which, if
understood, could provide a key to the understanding of one of the weirdest
regimes in the modern world.

One rule of this grammar is that no phenomenon could be described in
rational terms. Khomeinism, as an ideology based on esoteric mumbo-jumbo,
cannot admit the role of reason in shaping events. 

That grammar, in which reality is described by abstract labels, might have
worked in a primitive tribal society with little scope for conflicting
interests and aspirations. Applying it to a complex society such as Iran's
is naïve to say the least.

The newest label put in circulation is that of "deviant tendency."

 

It first appeared in 2009 when the daily Kayhan, reflecting the views of the
"Supreme Guide" Ali Khamenei, used it to attack un-named "enemies of the
Islamic Republic." Readers were told that the "deviant tendency" was
plotting against "the holy heritage" of the Imam, a title bestowed on the
late Ayatollah Khomeini.

At the time, observers believed that the label was meant for the supporters
of former Prime Minister Mir-Hussein Mousavi who refused to accept Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's re-election as president.

Last year, however, the label was used to attack un-named "plotters" who
were supposed to be trying to revive Iranian nationalism, along with
monarchist traditions, as a rival ideology.

Soon, however, we learned that the "deviant tendency" was present "within
the ruling elite, even inside the government." 

Early this year, the attacks became more precise. Readers learned that a
"dangerous character", identified only by his initial as E.M., was the
leader of the "deviant tendency".

That "dangerous character", we were told, pursued a hidden agenda to push
the clergy back into the mosques, purge the Persian language of Arabic
words, and revive the Persian Empire.

It took the media controlled by the "Supreme Guide" another six months to
identify the mysterious E.M as Esfandiar Masha'i, a charismatic figure
regarded as Ahmadinejad's spiritual guru. 

Officially, Masha'i is Ahmadinejad's Special Advisor and bureau chief. In
reality, he seems to be the president's top strategist. 

Until this week, the Iranian media were reporting what looked like a power
struggle between Khamenei and Masha'i. 

Last Monday, Kayhan pulled the curtain further by referring to
"Ahmadinejad's deviant tendency." 

Although presented as an ideological fight, the conflict may be about
mundane matters such as money.

Over the past five years, Ahmadinejad has tried to revive the structures of
the state. 

Since the revolution, these structures have been either sidelined or
dismantled. Their place has been taken by informal structures built around
powerful mullahs, sections of the military-security elite, and the so-called
"foundations" controlled by the "Supreme Guide". These informal structures
have a clientele of millions and act as the regime's base of support.

Ahmadinejad's strategy, presumably worked out by Masha'i, is to circumvent
these structures and gradually cut their access to public funds. The goal is
to put the clock back to when Iran's oil income was spent by the government
rather than informal and thus unaccountable interest groups.

That the fight is over money is now quite openly reflected in the official
media.

The media of the "Supreme Guide" cite a series of cases in which the
"deviant tendency" is supposed to be trying to seize control.

In one case, the "deviant tendency" won control of the cultural budget,
amounting to around $40 million and tried to use it to repair ancient
monuments, organize art festivals, and finance film and theatre productions.
After a big fight, the "Supreme Guide" managed to win control of almost half
of the budget to be distributed among mullahs and spent on "furthering
religious purposes."

In another case, the "deviant tendency" shut companies controlled by
Mojtaba, a son of the "Supreme Guide", from a $100 million real estate and
leisure project on the Kish island. Instead, Iranian-American investors were
brought in to help the government realize the project.

In yet another case, the "deviant tendency" created a public-private
partnership to gain control of Iran Khodro, the country's largest automobile
manufacturer. Not surprisingly, business circles linked to the "Supreme
Guide" were furious.

Another case concerns a trans-national railway line from the Gulf of Oman to
Central Asia. Again, the entourage of the "Supreme Guide" have failed to
receive a share in the $30 billion project, slated to take a decade to
complete.

The "deviant tendency" has also rattled nerves, especially among the 200 or
so individuals who owe some $50 billion to government banks. Many of these
debtors are powerful mullahs whose support is crucial for sustaining
Khamenei's claim of leadership.

Some mullahs have lost the gold seams they have been working for years. 

One ayatollah who monopolized imports of sugar has seen half of his business
transferred a government company. Another ayatollah has seen his quota for
imports of wheat disappear as the government buys more wheat, at higher
price, from domestic farmers.

Ahmadinejad's most daring coup may be his attempt at gaining control of the
oil industry. 

He has started by abolishing the Ministry of Petroleum that, over the years,
has become an empty shell. Iranian oil industry is controlled by a galaxy of
40 or so companies owned and controlled by powerful clerics and Islamic
Revolutionary Guard commanders. The plan is to revive the National Iranian
Oil Company (NIOC) as a state-owned concern dealing with all aspects of the
industry.

The fate of such big projects as the gas pipeline to India, initially won by
companies linked to the "Supreme Guide", remains unclear.

At first, Ahmadinejad tried to win the backing of the military against the
mullahs. Under an ambitious privatisation program, he transferred public
companies worth $18 billion to the military. More recently, however, the
"deviant tendency" has been trying to limit the military's economic power as
well. This could lead to an alliance between businessman-mullahs and
businessman-generals against the "deviant tendency". 

Ahmadinejad may have tried do bite more than he could chew. A fight over
money is more serious than an ideological quarrel, especially when we are
talking of serious money. 

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/index.php> FamilySecurityMatters.org
Contributing Editor Amir Taheri writes for the  <http://www.nypost.com/> NY
Post and the
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704431404575067193404330842.h
tml?mod=googlenews_wsj> Wall Street Journal. His latest book is
<http://www.amazon.com/Persian-Night-under-Khomeinist-Revolution/dp/15940324
08> The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to