http://www.newswithviews.com/JBWilliams/williams149.htm
WHICH GOP CANDIDATES REALLY CARE ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION? By J.B. Williams May 27, 2011 NewsWithViews.com What issue takes precedence over a known fraud in the White House and all of the kingmakers who made it possible? If Article II of the U.S. Constitution means nothing to a GOP candidate at this late date, after the issuance of two forged Obama documents, what else in the Constitution do they care about? And if a GOP candidate is not willing to take on the most important question of the era, who is the fraud in the White House, how did he get there and how do we make sure that this can never happen again, why would there be a second question for that candidate? For over two years now, a mountain of evidence has been collected and released on the Internet proving numerous ways that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "natural born citizen" eligible for the office of President and Commander-in-Chief. Every member of congress knows it and so does every member of the U.S. Supreme Court. But nobody, not even the newly elected Tea Party candidates of 2010 have raised a finger to do anything about it. The precedent stands, anyone from anywhere, loyal to foreign entities can be President of the United States now, without even having to provide the basic background information that is required every day in low level jobs across the country and around the globe. Obama could never pass a standard FBI background check or high level security clearance. Yet, if this issue in not addressed, the precedence has been established. Anyone, loyal to any foreign entity, can be president and nobody can even question that individual. If GOP candidates are not willing to take on this most vital issue to the future of freedom, liberty, decency, transparency and constitutional self-governance, what else should voters count on those candidates to do on behalf of the people? Which of the potential 2012 GOP candidates cares about Article II? Herman Cain - NO Newt Gingrich - NO Ron Paul - NO Tim Pawlenty - NO Mitt Romney - NO Rick Santorum - NO Michele Bachmann - NO John Bolton - NO Lindsey Graham - NO Sarah Palin - NO Jeb Bush - NO Chris Christie - NO Jim DeMint - NO Bob McDonald - NO How many of these people even know the true definition of natural born citizen <http://www.constitution.org/vattel/vattel.htm> ? If they don't know it, how much do they really care about the Constitution? . natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. . As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. . The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; . in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. Should anyone who does not know this basic information be trusted to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States? Should people who do not care about Article II of the Constitution be trusted to care about any other part of the Constitution? If the Tea Party accomplished nothing else, it did accomplish putting the U.S. Constitution back on the table for debate. By the 2010 election cycle, even Nancy Pelosi was mumbling Tea Party talking points as she tried to stop the Republican tsunami that stripped her of her gavel. But talking about the Constitution and actually acting to uphold and defend the Constitution are two very different things. If the people elected in 2010 and 2012 won't ACT to protect the Constitution, all of the flowery rhetoric about the Constitution is meaningless. And if they won't uphold Article II, which parts of the Constitution should we expect them to uphold? Obama and his media minions told the world that he released his birth certificate back in 2009. That was proven to be an outright lie when he released another birth certificate, different from the first, in May of 2011, under increasing public pressure from business mogul Donald Trump. Like everyone else above a 3rd grade education with an interest in truth, Trump has figured out that the second White House birth certificate <http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=303181> is also a forgery. Surely the GOP candidates are smart enough to figure this out too, and if they aren't, are they smart enough to be president of the United States at a time when we really need a real president? Each American must find their own path here, choose what is most important to them and make their decisions on that basis. As for me, the U.S. Constitution really does come first, and if a candidate is not willing to uphold Article II, then I do not believe they will be willing to uphold any other part of those principles and values. In the 2012 GOP primaries, I have only one question for each candidate. Dear candidate - What do YOU intend to do about the fraud in the White House and the utter intentional destruction of the U.S. Constitution, our economic systems and our way of life under their criminally evil assault on all things American? If you don't answer that question correctly, I have no second question for you! I stand for the Constitution, including Article II. If you don't, I'm not interested... Until we have a candidate who cares about Article II, we DO NOT have a candidate who cares about the constitution! That's simply unacceptable! [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
