Red Dawn: Remaking a Remake

Posted By Alan W. Dowd On May 27, 2011 

The remake of the hit 1984 film "Red Dawn" has been remade. It seems
Hollywood was worried about choosing a politically incorrect-and financially
risky-bad guy.

The bad guys in the original were Soviet and Cuban paratroopers invading a
weakened, hollowed-out America. In the original "Red Dawn", the invading
army's advance into the heart of America is stymied by a guerrilla force
made up largely of teenagers hiding out in the wooded mountain areas of
Colorado. They call themselves "The Wolverines" after their high school
mascot. Most of the Wolverines are killed but not before they repulse and
reverse the communist invaders-and rescue America.

The updated version of the film, which was ready for distribution in 2010,
substituted Chinese troops for the Soviets. But that worried MGM execs, who
didn't want to jeopardize future movie deals in China's massive market. So
MGM ordered the film to be radically redone in post-production, taking what
The Los Angeles Times calls
<http://articles.latimes.com/2011/mar/16/entertainment/la-et-china-red-dawn-
20110316>  "the highly unusual" and "extraordinary step of digitally
altering a film to excise bad guys from the communist nation lest the
leadership in Beijing be offended."

The result, according to published reports, is that most references to China
have been replaced with North Korea. The MGM self-censors have gone so far
as "digitally erasing Chinese flags and military symbols." According to The
Times, "There's no known precedent for changing the nationality of an entire
group of characters."

All of this happened without Beijing "uttering a word of official protest,"
according to The Times, which notes that we may be witnessing the beginning
of a trend. The video game "Homefront" originally was set around a Chinese
invasion of the United States, but "for business reasons, publisher THQ
changed the occupying forces to North Korea."

"Potential distributors are nervous about becoming associated with the
finished film, concerned that doing so would harm their ability to do
business with the rising Asian superpower," The Times reports. MGM hopes to
cash in on the Chinese market with future films in the James Bond and Hobbit
franchises, according to The Times.

There's more at work here, however, than the studio's understandable desire
to maximize profits. Artistic freedom and artistic integrity are also at
stake-or perhaps better said, were at stake. Moreover, it all has the whiff
of a kind of appeasement.

Think about the perverse irony here: The People's Republic of China-the land
where government censors control the Internet, government agents write the
news, government bureaus approve religious activity, government decrees
determine how many children a family can have-gets an American media
conglomerate to rewrite, revise and rework a piece of fiction so as not to
cause offense. The whole episode must make the PRC's rulers laugh-and their
subjects wonder why Americans don't treasure the First Amendment. 

Indeed, the notion of changing a finished film for fear that it might offend
a foreign government-and a brutal dictatorship at that-seems antithetical to
the American way of looking at the world and especially at odds with
Hollywood's modus operandi. After all, Hollywood certainly hasn't censored
itself when it comes to producing films that might offend, challenge,
criticize, question or otherwise impugn U.S. policies, American history,
American traditions and institutions, or specific U.S. political figures.
The list is endless-"JFK", "W", "Wall Street", "The People vs. Larry Flint",
"Born on the Fourth of July", "Platoon" and "Salvador"-and those are just
Oliver Stone films.

To be sure, depicting a Chinese invasion of the United States probably
wouldn't promote friendship. Of course, neither would it contribute to
hostility. But altering a film to appease the gatekeepers of China's massive
market could contribute to the sense among China's ruling elite that they
hold all the cards. As Joseph Nye recently observed, admittedly in relation
to the much bigger, broader issue of U.S.-China power perception, many
Chinese "believe that the recession of 2008 represented a shift in the
balance of world power, and that China should be less deferential to a
declining United States..Faulty power assessments have created hubris among
some Chinese..Any American compromise is read in Beijing as confirmation of
American weakness."

While reasonable people can disagree about whether China is a friend, foe or
something in between, the PRC certainly represents a long-term challenge to
the United States. And while a U.S.-PRC conflict may be unthinkable to most
Americans today-and let's hope it doesn't happen-it pays to recall that
China and America have gone to war in the recent past (the Korea War),
China's military spending is growing by 12 percent annually, U.S. Pacific
Command is expanding its capabilities and strengthening its web of alliances
because of China, and observers on both sides of the Pacific conclude that
the two powers are already in the early stages of a new cold war.

None of this makes a shooting war between the U.S. and the PRC inevitable,
but it does help explain why a screenwriter would choose today's PRC to
replace yesterday's USSR in the "Red Dawn" remake.

A North Korean invasion or occupation of the U.S., on the other hand, is
downright laughable. To be sure, North Korea is a dangerous enemy and
represents a real threat to regional stability and to two of America's
closest, oldest allies in the Asia-Pacific region. But it is starving,
insular, backward, hollow and hermetic. It can hurt America but it could
never invade America.

MGM's post-production switch from China to North Korea calls to mind how
studio execs changed Tom Clancy's riveting and all-too real 1991 novel "The
Sum of All Fears", which contemplated the global consequences of a nuclear
bomb falling into the hands of a jihadist group, into a movie where
jihadists are nowhere to be seen and the villains are a cabal European
neo-Nazis. The result was something that was neither believable nor
entertaining.

We can expect the same from the remade remake of "Red Dawn."

 <http://twitter.com/alanwdowd> Alan W. Dowd writes on defense and security
issues.

 

  _____  

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

URL to article:
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/27/red-dawn-remaking-a-remake/

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to