http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0511/patriot_act_expands.php3?printer_frien dly
May 4, 2011 / 30 Nissan, 5771 Progressives frustrated at new anti-terror, defense bill By Kim Geiger Policies stricter than those in Bush administration, critics charge mASHINGTON - (MCT) Brushing aside objections from the White House, the House of Representatives on Thursday passed a $690 billion defense spending bill that would expand the president's authority to pursue terrorists around the world while limiting the government's options for prosecuting detainees. The bill would fund the Pentagon and provide $119 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Senate has yet to pass its own version. The White House supports some parts of the bill, but has threatened a veto over several provisions. Two days of debate and consideration of 152 amendments failed to produce any concessions to the White House objections. One provision would prevent the government from transferring detainees currently held at Guantanamo Bay to the U.S. to be tried in federal court. The White House called the provision "a dangerous and unprecedented challenge" to executive branch authority. But House Republicans - and some Democrats - weren't moved by that argument and instead added a measure that imposes further limits on the administration's authority by requiring that all foreign nationals accused of participating in terrorist attacks be tried by military commission, not in federal court. "That provision is far worse than any of the Bush administration detention policies," said Ken Gude, managing director for national security at the Center for American Progress, a think tank with close ties to the administration. "They never contemplated cutting off the ability to use federal courts to prosecute terrorism suspects. This is a giant step back." Gude said the provision "slipped in, unnoticed" because most lawmakers were focused on another issue - a provision that grants the president greater authority to pursue suspected terrorists without first consulting Congress. That provision builds on legislation passed after the Sept. 11 attacks that allowed former President George W. Bush to pursue perpetrators of the attacks and their collaborators without first consulting with Congress. The bill that passed Thursday would no longer require that targets have a connection to Sept. 11, instead granting the president authority to "use all necessary and appropriate force during the current armed conflict with al-Qaida, the Taliban and associated forces." A bipartisan group of lawmakers argued that the provision gives the White House too much power and undercuts Congress' authority and launched a failed effort to strike the language from the bill. The two-day debate over the bill exposed growing antipathy in Congress over U.S. military activities abroad. On one amendment that was narrowly defeated, 204 lawmakers, including 26 Republicans, voted in favor of requiring a timetable for the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. A similar amendment last year received just 162 votes, only nine from Republicans. The House also overwhelmingly passed a measure that would block the deployment of troops or private security contractors to Libya. Observers said the anti-war sentiment showed growing frustration with the U.S. wars abroad, but noted that Congress has traditionally stopped short of fully exercising its authority over military policy. "There will always be some interest in asserting congressional prerogatives and powers," said Stephen Biddle, a military strategist at the nonpartisan Council on Foreign Relations. "But not if, in exchange, it means they have to actually take responsibility for whether or not to wage war (or) whether to get out of a war." [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
