May 28, 2011 


CAIR Wants Homeland Security to Silence 'Fear-Mongers'


Chuck Roger

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told
<http://frontpagemag.com/2011/05/25/netanyahu-shines-in-speech-to-congress/>
a May 24 joint meeting of Congress, "Militant Islam threatens the world. It
threatens Islam." Netanyahu was specifically referring to Iran's potential
use and proliferation of nuclear weapons throughout the Islamic terrorist
network. Yet the Prime Minister's statement applies even without considering
the addition of nuclear weapons to the terrorists' arsenal. Truly, anyone
denying that radical Islamists instigate most terrorist incidents denies
reality.

It is against the backdrop described by Netanyahu that Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Director Nihad Awad sent a recent letter
<http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/islamic-group-asks-napolitano-investiga
t>  to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano asking for "an
agency-wide investigation of the use of outside trainers who offer hostile,
stereotypical and grossly inaccurate information about Muslims and Islam to
our nation's security personnel." Awad calls the trainers "fear-mongers."
The director doesn't much clarify what is meant by "hostile" and
"inaccurate," but the man does do a great deal of obfuscating.

Awad's letter adopts CAIR's standard position that when anyone makes any
observation that labels any Muslim as "hostile," the observer must be
considered hostile. When analysts offer evidence that Muslims have behaved
badly, the analysts are advancing "inaccurate" analyses. Acknowledging that
some Muslims do bad things perpetuates a "stereotypical" profile of all
Muslims. Such posturing lacks intellectual integrity.

Awad condemns "a controversial security drill" in which a subject "who
appeared to be Middle Eastern in descent or Indian/Pakistani" was used to
test airport screening procedures. Awad proposes no alternate method for the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to train personnel to look for
Middle Eastern terrorists in a Middle Eastern terrorist-threatened world.

CAIR's criticize-but-offer-no-alternative style of "thinking" is shared by
American progressives. In the CAIR/progressive mental model, it is verboten
to cast Middle Easterners as more likely terrorists than
ninety-five-year-old wheelchair-bound Iowans. Had such thinking been applied
in a particular type of incident, the frequency of which peaked in the 1950s
and 1960s, police would have been frisking black children on bicycles while
ignoring angry white guys driving around with white sheets in the back
seats. The word "dumb" is too complimentary to the proponents of such an
approach.

In the letter to Napolitano, Awad expressed concern over a government
contractor named Walid Shoebat training law enforcement personnel in
terrorist screening techniques. Shoebat has indeed stated
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20110506/pl_usnw/DC97107_1>  that "Islam is
the devil" and that President Obama is a Muslim. But Awad did not
acknowledge that Schoebat is also a reformed Palestine Liberation
Organization terrorist who developed
<http://www.rapidcityjournal.com/news/042f2a16-8368-11e0-b921-001cc4c03286.h
tml>  firsthand the view that terrorism is inherent in Middle Eastern Islam.
Still, CAIR's concern over someone like Shoebat teaching excessively zealous
"lessons" is understandable.

Less understandable, however, is Awad calling
<http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/islamic-group-asks-napolitano-investiga
t>  Robert Spencer an "Islamophobe" and accusing the noted Islam scholar
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/>  of co-founding a "hate group." By engaging in
such shrillness, Awad again role models CAIR's propensity for assigning the
adjective "Islamaphobic" to anyone who points out negative truths about
Islam. Spencer has made a practice of sticking to well-researched facts.
Awad's characterization of Spencer as being in the same league as Shoebat
demonstrates poor judgment at best.

On the whole, the thrust of Awad's letter is that evidence which highlights
violent elements within Islam must be considered "anti-Muslim propaganda."
In essence, truths that offend CAIR must be reclassified as fiction. The
letter calls law enforcement training materials that cast radical Muslims as
terrorists "garbage."

And CAIR's ideological zealotry runs deeper still. The organization's
website cites
<http://www.cair.com/ArticleDetails.aspx?ArticleID=26780&&name=n&&currPage=1
>  a report
<http://www.publiceye.org/liberty/training/Muslim_Menace_Complete.pdf> ,
"Manufacturing the Muslim Menace," by a member of a progressive organization
called Political Research Associates <http://www.publiceye.org/index.php> .
The document opens by quoting a Georgetown University professor who implies
that a "group of private security firms operating outside officially
accredited systems" has all but made up the Islamist threat and in the
process "demonize[d] mainstream Islam and Muslim Communities." The PRA
report proceeds to carry forward the tone of the professor's allegation.
Nihad Awad's letter to Homeland Security keeps the farce alive.


A writer, physicist, and former high tech executive, Chuck Rogér invites you
to sign up to receive his "Clear Thinking" blog posts by email at
http://www.chuckroger.com/. Contact Chuck at [email protected].


Page Printed from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/05/cair_wants_homeland_security_t.h
tml at May 29, 2011 - 05:33:26 PM CDT 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to