http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38003
<http://www.jamestown.org/programs/gta/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=38003&;
tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=26&cHash=6689a15a891317234c06e139fb530f33>
&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=26&cHash=6689a15a891317234c06e139fb530f33

 

LIBYA'S WARFALLA TRIBE SWITCHING LOYALTIES?

Four decades of changing tribal policies in Qaddafi's Libya, combined with
the effect of urbanization on traditional ways of life, has made any attempt
to gage the loyalties of Libya's tribes one of inherent difficulty. In the
case of Libya's largest tribe, the Arab-Berber Warfalla, this is certainly
the case. Incorporating over one million of Libya's six million people, the
loyalty of the Warfalla to the Qaddafi regime is considered to be one of the
most important factors in the survival or demise of the existing power
structure. 

Shortly after the Libyan rebellion began, early reports suggested the
Warfalla had gone over to the rebel side in wholesale fashion. However,
these reports ignored the complexity of the issue of Warfalla loyalty and
did not take into account several factors, including the importance of the
Warfalla in the Libyan security apparatus and the ability of the regime's
patronage system to purchase or coerce loyalty when necessary. As cash and
arms flooded into Warfalla communities, it soon became apparent that the
regime was able to continue to count on the loyalty of large numbers of
Warfalla. 

The Warfalla, together with the Qadhafa and the Magarha, have traditionally
been considered the pillars of the Qaddafi regime, dominating the security
services and the leadership of the military. In the case of the Warfalla,
however, this support has been inconsistent, most notably in the mounting of
a coup attempt by Warfalla members of the regime in 1993 as a result of
their rivalry with the Magarha for top positions within the government. The
failure of this attempt to overthrow Qaddafi naturally resulted in a
temporary decline of Warfalla influence in the Libyan power structure as
many leading members were purged and eventually executed. Nonetheless, the
Warfalla remain prominent in the regime's "revolutionary committees," a
paramilitary force entrusted with securing loyalty to the Qaddafis, by force
if necessary.

Even the Warfalla stronghold of Bani Walid, a city in the Misrata district,
has witnessed both pro and anti-regime demonstrations. The tribe's paramount
leader, the U.S.-educated Mansour Khalaf, has made an art of riding the
fence in these difficult days, persuading both sides to refrain from public
demonstrations and professing loyalty to the regime while hesitating to
commit Warfalla fighters to the regime's preservation. 

A recent conference of Libyan tribal leaders held in Istanbul may indicate
the beginning of a major shift in loyalty away from the Qaddafi regime
(though it should be noted that many Warfalla in the Benghazi region have
been committed to the rebellion from the start). Over 100 tribal leaders,
most of them Warfalla, met on May 28-29 to call for an end to the fighting
in Libya and the removal of Mu'ammar Qaddafi and his sons from the Libyan
government (al-Jazeera, May 29; Tripoli Post, May 30). Many of the delegates
were described as senior professionals from Libya, while others were
dissidents who have been living in exile for some years. The Istanbul
conference followed earlier meetings in Dubai and Qatar and its location was
intended by its organizers as a means of acknowledging Turkey's support for
the Libyan people in the ongoing crisis (Today's Zaman, May 29). 

Delegates to the conference agreed on the following points: 

. The "full participation" of Bani Walid in the rebellion, a step that would
relieve pressure on besieged Misrata and the Berber mountain communities of
western Libya.

. The need to end the bloodshed, eliminate "tyranny," and remove the Qaddafi
family from any positions of power or influence in Libya. 

. A warning to all those involved in violating human rights on behalf of the
regime that they would be held to account for their actions.

. A request to the Libyan leader not to leave the country "because we want
to bring you to justice, we will have you tried for the 42 years that you
have enslaved us" (Tripoli Post, May 29, al-Jazeera, May 29). 

After the regime learned of the conference on May 29, there were reports
that government security forces had entered Bani Walid, resulting in a
series of clashes in which at least 11 people were killed (al-Jazeera, May
29).

However, it is unrealistic to believe the Warfalla act in concert under a
unified leadership when the "tribe" is actually more of a confederacy of 52
sub-tribes spread across Libya, each with its own local leaders, local
concerns and varying degrees of affiliation or loyalty to the existing
regime. Similarly, like many of the other major Libyan tribes, large numbers
of Warfalla are urbanized residents of the coastal cities. As such,
intermarriage with other tribal groups and separation from traditional
tribal leaders has reduced the number of Warfalla who take direction from
the traditional leadership. While a shift in allegiance on the part of some
tribal leaders may result in a decline of support for the regime, such
support was never unanimous in the first place - thus such a shift can be
expected to have at best a significant but relatively limited impact on the
struggle for Libya. While various Warfalla have declared support either for
the regime or the opposition, it would be accurate to say most members of
the tribe continue to wait in pragmatic fashion for some definitive change
in the regime's fortunes before making a final and likely irreversible
decision on the direction they will take in the future of the Libyan state. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to