http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/politics/house-votes-to-cut-tsas-budget-
by-270million/2011/06/02/AGXmnaHH_story.html?nl_headlines

 


House votes to cut TSA's budget by $270 million


*       


By Joe Davidson
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/joe-davidson/2011/03/02/ABXUQ7M_page.html> ,
Published: June 2 | Updated: Friday, June 3, 12:29 AM


The Republican-controlled House approved legislation Thursday that would cut
funding for transportation security officers, the men and women on the front
line of aviation safety.

The 219 to 204 vote approved cutting the Transportation Security
Administration's budget by $270 million, according to Democrats and union
leaders.

"At a time when intelligence tells us that terrorists remain interested in
attacking transportation, this amendment would cut TSA's screening workforce
by more than 10 percent," about 5,000 people, said Kristin Lee, an agency
spokeswoman.

In a letter to House members before the vote on Rep. John L. Mica's (R-Fla.)
amendment, Colleen M. Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees
Union, said the budget cut would "damage the traveling safety of the public
and hurt Transportation Security Officers' ability to do their jobs."

Even as TSOs are in the midst of voting for a union to represent them, the
House also voted 218 to 205 to prevent TSA from collective bargaining with
its workers.

Both measures were contained in a $42.3 billion homeland security budget
bill for fiscal year 2012, which the House passed 231 to 188.

Union leaders hope that the Senate, which labor-friendly Democrats control,
will reject the two amendments.

In February, TSA Administrator John Pistole said he would allow
<http://www.tsa.gov/press/happenings/2011/11_0204_fact_sheet_on_collective_b
argaining.shtm>  strictly limited collective bargaining for about 44,000
officers, who screen passengers and baggage at the nation's airports.

Rep. Todd Rokita (R-Ind.),
<http://rokita.house.gov/press-release/rokita-offers-amendment-prevent-tsa-c
ollective-bargaining>  who offered the labor amendment, said:
"Collective-bargaining agreements would hamper the critical nature of TSA
agents' national security responsibilities. TSA agents are no different than
FBI, CIA and Secret Service agents; we do not negotiate
collective-bargaining agreements with security personnel, and TSA clearly
falls within that category."

Negotiating collective-bargaining agreements, however, would clearly place
TSA in the category of other federal security agencies, as three House
Democrats said in urging colleagues to vote against the Rokita amendment.

"In fact, other officers at the Department of Homeland Security, including
those at Customs and Border Protection and the Federal Protective Service,
already have collective-bargaining rights, which have had no negative impact
on job performance or security," Reps. Bennie G. Thompson (Miss.), Nita
Lowey (N.Y.) and Sheila Jackson Lee (Tex.) wrote in a letter.

TSA officers have until June 21 to cast a vote for either NTEU or the
American Federation of Government Employees <http://www.afge.org> . An
earlier vote ended with neither labor organization getting a majority of the
votes cast.

In a letter to House members, Beth Moten, AFGE's legislative director, said
the Rokita amendment would have "a profound and detrimental impact on the
work lives" of TSOs.

When Pistole decided, after several months of study, to allow collective
bargaining, he said, "Morale and employee engagement cannot be separated
from achieving superior security."

He barred bargaining over security policies, compensation, discipline
standards, proficiency testing and job qualifications. Bargaining would be
allowed over shift bids, transfers and awards.

"We will not negotiate over security," Pistole said

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to