http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/pamela-geller-on-fox -business-mainstreaming-stoning-women-under-islamic-law-in-us-media.html
June 06, 2011 VIDEO Pamela Geller on Fox Business: Media Mainstreams Islamic Law I was on Eric Bolling's show, Follow the Money, discussing the mainstreaming of Sharia and islamic gender apartheid <http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/pamela-geller-on-fo x-business-tonight-mainstreaming-sharia-and-islamic-gender-apartheid.html> . We discussed an article by a Muslim woman, Shamci Rafani of Visalia, California, that appeared in yesterday's Visalia Times-Delta, calling for the stoning of women who engage in infidelity. The very idea that this ran in a California newspaper speaks more to the issue than this Muslima's ardent belief in the Sharia. It is astounding that an American newspaper published this. Are they being paid to mainstream Sharia? This article is an effort to justify a barbaric practice, a practice that is regularly carried out in Iran and elsewhere in the Islamic world, with women being stoned to death for adultery. This is in full accord with the Islamic law that we're always told is compatible with Western law, and that we need not and should not outlaw. Of course Muslim Brotherhood-tied CAIR's Christina Abraham (she's got the Christians and the Jews covered with that alias) was on, practicing deception and taqiyya, saying this has nothing to do with the Sharia. Unfaithful wives should be put to death <http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/article/20110601/OPINION03/106010312/Unfai thful-wives-should-put-death> [...] In many countries, including mine, when a man makes such a mistake as Arnold did and fathers a child, the law makes him be the father and take the responsibility. But the woman who had been aware of her wrongdoing, and yet had done it without any shame or fear, must be punished severely. Yes, in many countries, the public will stone that woman to death. Believe me, that might be the right answer to the behavior of these kind of loose women, who want to blame it all on men. My main question is, how many more families have to be destroyed? How many families have to lose their hap-piness and their dignity because of these loose women? And how long would it take for lawmakers to keep these loose women responsible for their own actions? These women are doing it without any shame and embarrassment as long as the media and the society, in general, are accepting them with open arms, as if they had been victims. I am not saying that these men had a right to do so, yet my con-cern is that women's liberalization had passed their boundaries by creating these kind of activities with the name of (equality of sexes), and by destroying many families' happiness, have not been able to gain any valuable thing. To be equal with the opposite sex does not mean to sell yourself cheaply, announce it to the world and be proud of it. Power could come from moral, dignity and real love (which means not to ruin other people's happiness) and then get away with it. Sleeping around with any man who came along, especially with a married man, must not be something to be proud of and awarded for. These women not only must not be awarded, but they must pay for destroying the happiness and the future of their victims, especially this woman who lived with the family and had become a member of that family. These slut women do not know how to say no. To my judgment, these women who freely sleep with married men must be severely punished and put to death. If the lawmakers do something about it, you will find less stories like Arnold's. Fight the mainstreaming of sharia in our protest Friday in the Florida honor killing cover-up: "Justice for Fatima" Protest, June 10th, Tampa, Florida. Stand Against Honor Killing Cover-Up <http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/06/justice-for-fatima- protest-june-10th-tampa-florida-stand-against-honor-killing-cover-up.html> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
