http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10098/pub_detail.asp

 

August 5, 2011


God's Will in a Military Maxim


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.44/author_detail.asp> W.
Thomas Smith, Jr.


Print This <javascript:%20printVersion()>  E-mail This
<javascript:%20emailVersion()>  



 <javascript:void(0);> http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/images/share.png


ShareThis <javascript:void(0);> 

 

Comments (0)
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/comments.asp?id=10098> 

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110804_Galahad.jpg

 

Years ago, I wrote a piece entitled, "Spirituality and military service,"
wherein I said service in the military is something akin to a religious
experience.

 

Writing then I said, "It is important that this is so." After all, to be a
good soldier one needs to embrace the soldierly virtues (those 'religious'
intangibles like loyalty, duty, respect, selfless service, honor, integrity,
and personal courage), because soldiers in combat have to deal with the
weighty responsibilities of life and death. Who leads? Who follows? Who
lives? Who dies? And why?

 

This relationship between spirituality and military service has existed as
the proverbial heart-and-soul of all combat forces since the beginning of
recorded military history - with all belligerents believing God was (or is)
on their side, and Napoleon himself once musing that "God is on the side of
the biggest battalions."

 

What I did not address in that piece was that the relationship between
spirituality and military service may also be seen and appreciated in the
light of how we - in a very personal, perhaps primal sense - thwart the
corrupting influence of man's fallen nature. In other words how the
relationship between spirituality and military service gives us strength to
overcome the pitfalls of that particular soldierly drive we know to be
ambition.

 

Make no mistake, a good soldier needs to be ambitious (in a measured
degree). Ambition is a reflection of his competitive nature, and without it
he has no fire within him to win.

 

Just as fire is necessary to fuel life, ambition is needed to fuel
competition. But like fire, ambition can quickly rage out of control, begin
to overwhelm the aforementioned soldierly virtues, and ultimately do more
damage than good.

 

This drive (or ambition) must be tempered.

 

As a means of tempering this drive this we have a military maxim: The
mission first, then the men, lastly me. It is simple albeit perfect formula
which, not only ensures the greatest chance of success in a given mission,
but it acknowledges the importance of the personal drive, yet keeps it under
control.

 

In my opinion, the mission and the men (both being first) are everything by
God's own design.

 

Problem is, even though we all understand this, the
fallen-nature-of-ourselves tries to sidetrack us into that ugly selfishness
- when ambition begins to overheat to the point that the military leader
becomes consumed with the desire to be appreciated and recognized. This is
not a good thing for a military leader.

 

The maxim - a tool to be applied in every instance of sound military
leadership - protects the military leader from himself. The maxim reminds
the military leader that he must always put the mission first, then take
care of the men. That does not mean the men are taking a backseat to the
mission. In fact, many of us like to say, "The mission first, the men
always."

 

When we look at the maxim's "me" element, we understand that "me" does take
a backseat to the mission and the men. As U.S. Marine Maj. Gen. James E.
Livingston, a Medal of Honor recipient, once told me, "The 'me' part of the
maxim must be far removed from the mission and the men."

 

But the military leader must never interpret "me" - being distanced from
"the mission and the men" - to mean that he should neglect himself. To
neglect "me" would be just as irresponsible as putting it in a status equal
to the mission and the men.

 

The best interpretation of the "The mission first, the men always" should be
that leaders eat last, and they put the mission and their people first.

 

This is not only a perfect maxim for success, it is a simple outline for
righteous living. It is - I believe - one of the few articulated expressions
of God's perfect Will.

 

God wants us to always serve the mission and the men. And the devil himself
(yes, I know it is not fashionable today to refer to the devil in serious
commentary) tries to disrupt or destroy God's Will by demanding we give the
selfish "me" the same attention we give the mission and the men.

 

But we know this is wrong.

 

This is just another reason I so love the military. Right and wrong stand so
clearly in contrast to one another. Just like courage (in its many forms)
and cowardice. Sacrifice and selfishness. Truth and untruth. Good and evil.

 

In the military, we cannot escape these antitheses of one another. Which is
why the great Swedish battle captain Gustavas Adolphus said in 1630, "A good
Christian will never make a bad soldier."

 

Indeed, for here we begin to see God's perfect Will in a simple military
maxim.

 

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/> FamilySecurityMatters.org
Contributing Editor
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.44/author_detail.asp> W.
Thomas Smith Jr. is a former U.S. Marine rifle-squad leader and
counterterrorism instructor, who writes about military/defense issues and
has covered conflict in the Balkans, on the West Bank, in Iraq and Lebanon.
Visit his  <http://uswriter.com/> website at uswriter.com.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to