09/01/2011 04:26 PM

Parallel Justice


Islamic 'Arbitrators' Shadow German Law


By Maximilian Popp

In mosques or tearooms, Muslim elders dispense verdicts that keep their 
communities in line. They mediate between aggrieved immigrants, sometimes at 
the expense of German justice. Some say the arbitrations ease caseloads in 
court, but others see the creeping advance of Sharia law.

The men ambushed Fuat S. on the street, then locked him in a basement and 
tortured him. Fuat was later admitted to the hospital in Berlin's Neukölln 
district with gaping wounds, contusions and broken bones.

Police took his statement concerning the attack the same night. Fuat S., a 
gambler and a recipient of "Hartz IV" -- Germany's social welfare benefits for 
the long-term unemployed -- gave a detailed statement. He'd conned an 
acquaintance, Mustafa O., out of €150,000 ($217,000) and the man was taking his 
revenge, Fuat said, together with his three brothers. They hit his hands, arms 
and knees with a hammer and threatened to shoot him. 

The public prosecutor's office in Berlin initiated proceedings against Mustafa 
O., a Palestinian man who had come to their attention repeatedly for violent 
acts. Police had investigated him in a number of cases, and now prosecutors saw 
an opportunity to convict a dangerous repeat offender. But when the case began, 
Fuat S., the principle witness, unexpectedly withdrew his testimony. It was not 
Mustafa who had tortured him, he said, but an Albanian man he didn't know. 
Mustafa, he said, wasn't even in the basement at the time. This was clearly a 
lie, as police analysis of telephone data showed, but the judge was forced to 
acquit the defendant due to lack of evidence.

The decision, in fact, was reached by a different judge. According to police, 
the victim's and the perpetrator's families had met at a restaurant in the 
presence of an Islamic "justice of the peace," an arbitrator who mediates 
conflicts between Muslims. The two families had reached a compromise: Fuat 
would drop the charges, and in exchange be relieved of part of his debt.

According to Bernhard Mix, the public prosecutor in charge of the case, Fuat's 
false testimony was part of a deal between the families. "It's difficult to 
establish the truth using legal means, when the perpetrator and the victim 
reach an agreement," he says.

Judges Without Laws 

Politicians and social workers tend to focus on forced marriages and honor 
killings, but the baleful influence of these Islamic arbitrators has gone 
largely unnoticed by the public. Joachim Wagner, an author and television 
journalist of many years, has taken a closer look at the phenomenon in his book 
"Richter ohne Gesetz" ("Judges without Laws"). Reconstructing Mustafa O.'s 
case, he reaches the conclusion that "the Islamic parallel justice system is 
becoming a threat to the constitutional legal system."

These justices of the peace don't wear robes. Their courtrooms are mosques or 
teahouses. They draw their authority not from the law, but from their standing 
within the community. Most of them are senior members of their families, or 
imams, and some even fly in from Turkey or Lebanon to resolve disputes. Muslims 
seek them out when families argue, when daughters take up with nonbelievers or 
when clans clash. They often trust these arbitrators more than they trust the 
state.

The late juvenile court judge Kirsten Heisig drew attention to this problem a 
year ago: "The law is slipping out of our hands. It's moving to the streets, or 
into a parallel system where an imam or another representative of the Koran 
determines what must be done."

In Wagner's book, judges and prosecutors tell of threats toward public 
officials and systematic interference with witnesses. "We know we're being 
given a performance, but the courts are powerless," says Stephan Kuperion, a 
juvenile court judge in Berlin. Federal public prosecutor Jörn Hauschild warns, 
"It would be a terrible development if serious criminal offences in these 
circles could no longer be resolved. The legal system would be reduced to 
collecting victims."

So who are these men who make the decisions about justice and love, lives and 
monetary compensation?

'They Trust Me' 

Hassan Allouche sits behind the wheel of his station wagon, steering the 
vehicle through Berlin's rush hour traffic with one hand, talking on his cell 
phone. Two Arabs have called on him for help in a rent dispute. He lights a 
cigarette and says, "People are afraid of the authorities. They trust me."

Allouche came to Germany from Lebanon 37 years ago. He acts as a religious 
arbitrator, just as his great-grandfather did before him. People greet him on 
the streets of Berlin, shaking his hand or bowing. "He's kept us from a great 
deal of harm," one Turkish businessman says.

Allouche's brother was shot while trying to resolve a conflict, and since then 
he always wears a bulletproof vest when doing his work. He says he mediates 200 
cases a year, often offers his own services and doesn't ask any payment, 
although he accepts gifts. "I do this for Germany and for Allah," he says.

Wagner, the journalist, believes that getting rich plays only a minor role for 
most of these arbitrators. Far more important, he says, are power and prestige, 
as they increase their influence within the community with each successful 
mediation.

Although the mediators generally work in secret, "it's common practice," Wagner 
says, repeating what Ralf Menkhorst, detective superintendent for the city of 
Essen, has told him. "Any beginner realizes after three cases that this 
phenomenon exists." Police in Bremen, for example, know of four or five 
arbitrators by name.

They operate in a gray area between conflict resolution and obstruction of 
justice. Allouche, for example, claims to work closely with authorities, but 
investigators suspect him of preventing witnesses from giving statements to the 
police. So far they've never been able to prove an obstruction of justice.

This culture of arbitration predates Islam, since earlier Arab tribes also 
solved conflicts with verdicts passed by senior family members. In countries 
such as Lebanon or in southeastern Turkey, these lay judges still take the 
place of governmental institutions. In Germany, they find followers wherever 
the local population includes many Muslims who haven't integrated into German 
culture. 

Ursula Spuler-Stegemann, an Islamic studies professor in Marburg, believes this 
distance between immigrants and the German state explains the success of 
religious arbitration. Many immigrants, she says, mistrust police and the legal 
system. Criminal prosecutors are concerned about extended Muslim families and 
strict religious groups. "They disdain the rule of law. They haven't 
integrated, and don't intend to. The family is above the law," Bremen's police 
write in a working paper.

Munich-based imam and arbitrator Sheik Abu Adam says he considers it a 
religious duty to mediate among the faithful. He invites both parties to visit 
him at the mosque, listens to both sides, and ultimately has them sign a peace 
treaty. The important thing, he says, is not who's right and wrong, and 
evidence is no particular help -- the important thing is to find a compromise. 
In nine out of 10 cases, the people respect his decision, he says. "My judgment 
is fairer than the government's," he says.

A Problem of Integration 

Abu Adam teaches a reactionary kind of Islam. He lives with three women, 
doesn't believe in separating religion from the state, and rejects moderate 
branches of his religion. "I tell my people, don't go to the police," the 
sheikh says unabashedly. "We'll take care of this conflict among ourselves." He 
dismisses accusations of running a shadow justice system, saying, "I'm making 
less work for the police."

Investigators do cooperate with Islamic arbitrators in a few exceptional cases. 
In Essen, for example, police and an imam work together to mediate disputes 
within Muslim families.

If these arbitrators would limit themselves to containing conflicts, there 
would be no reason to object, says legal and Islamic studies expert Mathias 
Rohe in the Bavarian city of Erlangen. German law, after all, allows for 
arbitration. What Rohe finds unacceptable is the exertion of influence over 
criminal proceedings. "Criminal prosecution is a privilege of the state," he 
says.

The state justice system, though, is having a hard time shaking off the shadow 
system. Klaus-Dieter Schromek, a judge in Bremen, criticizes his colleagues for 
not taking the phenomenon seriously enough. "If conflict mediators manage to 
force the justice system out of homicides and other serious violent crimes," he 
told Wagner for the book, "it will mean more conflicts settled using these 
methods."

Legal steps alone can't prevent a parallel Islamic justice system, not with so 
many immigrants from Muslim countries who insist on following values retained 
for centuries -- such as the primacy of men and the unconditional struggle for 
one's own honor and that of the family. One problem is that they pass on these 
clichés to their children, so even third-generation members of immigrant 
families mistrust the German legal system.

"We need to promote our constitutional legal state starting in school," says 
Rohe, the Islamic studies expert. If German integration were in better shape, 
he believes, Islamic arbitrators would have been out of work long ago. 





URL:


*       http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,783361,00.html

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to