http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.10355/pub_detail.asp

 

September 10, 2011


World Trade Center Facts that Cannot be Ignored


Joe Wright

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110910_WTCnew2.jpg

 

Hallowed Ground versus property rights. Just because someone happens to die
on another's property, that does not grant them any rights with respect to
how the property is used. Of course you can exercise your freedom of speech
and try to persuade the owner to do something you desire, but you must
recognize that you have no rights in the matter whatsoever.

 

The only parties who have the right to build on the WTC site are the Port
Authority which owns the land, Larry Silverstein who holds the lease for the
WTC itself and Westfield America which held the lease for retail space. 

Listening but not hearing. The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation
(LMDC) sponsored several Listening to The City (LTTC) events. But if
something was said that they didn't like, they chose not to hear it. For
example: 

 

Well over half the people at the Javits Center meeting rejected the LMDC's
six proposals for new buildings on the WTC site. "Looks too much like
Albany," many derisively said of the plans. 

 

During the online LTTC program, 60% voted that the towers should be rebuilt
as tall or taller than the original towers. 

 

In spite of these votes, the LMDC refused to consider any proposal for the
building of towers as tall or taller. 

 

They listened, but they did not hear. That is, unless you were a
memorialist. 

Memorials. Proposals ranged from dedicating the entire 16 acre site of the
WTC as a memorial to not building a memorial at all. The LMDC, in this case,
chose to listen to and hear only the memorial advocates. They turned a deaf
ear to anyone who said there should be no memorial. And they listened with
near deafness to anyone who said the memorial should be in proportion to the
numbers killed and injured.

 

Alexander Garvin, LMDC Vice President for Planning, Design and Development,
remarked at a NY1 Town Hall Meeting, "I'll guarantee you that the entire
site will be a memorial." While this might not have been meant to be taken
literally, it is an indication of the narrow mindedness and shallow thinking
of the LMDC. They lived up to the popular interpretation of their name, the
Leave Manhattan Destroyed Corporation. 

 

George E. Pataki, New York State Governor at the time, guaranteed that the
footprints of the twin towers would not be built on. Ex-mayor Rudolf
Giuliani caved to the victims' families and said he wanted the entire site
to be a memorial. 

 

All of this even though residents who live around the WTC pleaded that their
neighborhood not be turned into a cemetery, that they not be reminded of the
horror of 9/11 everyday for the rest of their lives when passing by or
through the site. 

 

Memorials that have been built, have been discrete and in proportion. None
have consumed the entire "battlefield." Over 60,000 were killed in the
Vietnam War. Compare that number to the space occupied by that war's
memorial. Consider Hiroshima where a modest memorial was built and the
entire city rebuilt. Consider the Pentagon which was made whole and not
insanely memorialized. 

 

To talk of anything other than a modest WTC memorial is to deal in the
absurd. It is also absurd to allow the 3,000 some victims' families to
dictate the future of Lower Manhattan and thus the entire city. 

No one will work in a WTC tower rebuilt as tall or taller. Some won't. So
what? Jonathan Hakala, whose company was on the 77th Floor, said he would
return. And so would thousands of others. How many people have refused to
work in existing tall buildings? Some did. So what? 

There's no need for all the office space in this depressed economy. Such
optimism! When the original towers were built, there was no demand. The
Empire State Building was empty for years as was Rockefeller Center.
Construction wasn't halted. In New York, we build on speculation and with
confidence that we will succeed. Besides, new twin towers wouldn't be ready
for occupancy for years to come. Should we just bury our heads in the sand? 

 

Not so very long before the 9/11 terrorist attack, local politicians and
representatives from New York City's biggest businesses met to determine how
to secure the City's ability to grow in the face of the steadily diminishing
supply of office space. Now that the WTC and its 11 million square feet of
office space has disappeared from the market, doesn't this greatly
exacerbate this problem? 

Rebuilding the towers would create new targets for terrorists. This is said
as if there are no other tall buildings that could be targeted. What about
the Sears Tower in Chicago or the Empire State Building? Should we tear them
down because they could be targets? Ron DeVito of Team Twin Towers said,
"You can't walk two blocks in NYC without seeing a building that could be a
target." 

Affordable housing must be included in any rebuilding plan. Whenever you see
the term "affordable housing," identify its real meaning: government housing
or government subsidized housing. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch
whether in housing or anything else. 

 

Subsidies will come out of everyone else's pockets whether they can afford
it or not. Peter will be robbed to provide housing for Paul. 

 

And, must it be said, that Lower Manhattan is and has been for years the
financial center of the nation, if not the world? There are plenty of areas
in the City for residential development. The WTC site clearly is not one of
them. 

Defending the towers. Many ignorantly characterized the Twin Towers as
deathtraps. Many accused them of being responsible for the deaths of almost
3,000 people. The World Trade Center Towers didn't kill anyone. The killers
were the terrorists who flew planes into the buildings and those who
supported and sponsored them. The terrorists were the killers. Let us never
lose sight of that fact. 

 

The towers saved lives. They stood long enough for tens of thousands of
people to get out before their collapse. Certainly, more lives could have
been saved if the buildings had been built differently, with modern
techniques and materials. But that's classic Monday morning quarterbacking. 

 

The towers stood and therefore tens of thousands of lives were saved. It is
a defamation to call them deathtraps. Everyone who survived 9/11 should
thank the designers, the engineers, the construction workers and the Port
Authority personnel who operated the towers. You owe your lives to those
many people. And to the towers themselves.

 

 <http://familysecuritymatters.org/> Family Security Matters Contributor Joe
Wright is currently editing a book about the World trade Center, featuring
contributions from various authors.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to