http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0911/glick091611.php3?printer_friendly
Sept. 16, 2011 / 17 Elul, 5771
The Palestinian obsession
By Caroline B. Glick
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/images/arafat_abbas_v_sign_cover.jpg
If nothing else, the Palestinians' UN statehood gambit goes a long way
towards revealing the deep-seated European and US pathologies that enable
and prolong the Palestinian conflict with Israel.
In a nutshell, the Palestinian Authority - or Fatah - or PLO initiative of
asking the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly to upgrade its
status to that of a sovereign UN member state or a sovereign non-UN member
state is an act of diplomatic aggression.
Eighteen years ago this week, on September 13, 1993, the PLO signed the
Declaration of Principles with Israel on the White House lawn. There, the
terror group committed itself to a peace process in which all disputes
between Israel and the PLO - including Palestinian statehood - would be
settled in the framework of bilateral negotiations.
The Palestinian Authority was established on the basis of this accord. The
territory, money, arms and international legitimacy it has been given was
due entirely to the PLO pledge to resolve the Palestinian conflict with
Israel through bilateral negotiations.
By abandoning negotiations with Israel two years ago, and opting instead to
achieve its nationalist aims outside the framework of a peace treaty with
Israel, the Palestinians are destroying the diplomatic edifice on which the
entire concept of a peace process is based. They are announcing that they
have no intention of living at peace with Israel. Rather they intend to move
ahead at Israel's expense.
In truth, there is little new in the Palestinians' behavior. They have been
using the UN to weaken Israel diplomatically since the early 1970s.
Moreover, even if their bid does provide them with upgraded diplomatic
status, it won't change the reality on the ground, nor are the Palestinians
particularly interested in changing the situation on the ground.
As the PLO ambassador in Lebanon Abdullah Abdullah made clear in an
interview Wednesday with Lebanon's Daily Star, in the event that the UN
recognizes some form of Palestinian statehood at the UN, the new "State of
Palestine" will still expect the UN to support the so-called Palestinian
"refugees." This is true, he said, even for the "refugees" who live in Gaza,
Judea and Samaria. That is, the same UN that the Palestinians seek
recognition of statehood from will be expected to provide relief to
Palestinian "refugees" living inside of "Palestine."
As he put it, "Even Palestinian refugees living in [refugee camps] inside
the [Palestinian] state, they are still refugees. They will not be
considered citizens."
So if nothing will change on the ground, why do the US and the EU care what
the Palestinians do at the UN next week with their automatic General
Assembly majority?
Why have the senior peace processors of Washington and Europe descended on
Jerusalem and Ramallah, begging and pleading with the Palestinians to cancel
their plans?
Why have the Americans and the Europeans been pressuring Israel to make
massive concessions to the Palestinians in order to convince them to put out
the diplomatic fire there have set at the UN?
Why are the White House and the State Department telling the media that the
US will consider it a major diplomatic embarrassment if the Palestinians go
through with their threats?
Why in short, do the Americans and the Europeans care about this?
The Palestinians have certainly never given either the Americans or the
Europeans a good reason to support their cause. Just this week, the PLO
representative in Washington told reporters that the future state of
Palestine will ban Jews and homosexuals.
And yet, the Obama administration and the EU have made the establishment of
a racist, homophobic Palestinian state the greatest aim of their policies in
the Middle East.
Every single Palestinian leader from the supposedly moderate Fatah party has
rejected Israel's right to exist and stated that they will never set aside
their demand that Israel accept millions of foreign born Arabs - the
so-called Palestinian "refugees" -- as citizens. They say this with the full
knowledge that this demand is nothing less than a demand for Israel's
destruction.
And yet, both the US and the EU, which certainly do not support the
destruction of Israel, insist that it is imperative to strengthen and
support the supposedly moderate Fatah party which seeks the destruction of
Israel.
Every year, the US and Europe transfer collectively approximately a billion
dollars in various forms of aid to the Palestinian Authority and yet, the PA
has failed to develop a market economy capable of supporting the
Palestinians without foreign assistance. Rather, they have developed a
welfare society where most economic activity stems from foreign handouts.
Rather than feel embarrassment at their failures, PA leaders use their
economic corruption to continuously threaten their patrons. If aid is cut
off, they say, the PA will disintegrate and the far more popular Hamas
movement will take over, and then, woe of woes, the peace process will be
destroyed.
Of course, Hamas is also sustained by Western aid dollars. Every month, the
same PA that warns of the dangers of a rising Hamas transfers tens of
millions of foreign aid to Hamas-controlled Gaza to pay salaries of Hamas
"government" employees.
Yet despite its mafia economy, and its exploitation of their aid funds to
support a terrorist organization, the US and EU insist on maintaining the
PA's status as the largest per capita foreign aid recipient in human
history. And they do so even as the Euro zone is on the brink of collapse
and the US is descending rapidly into a new recession.
Finally, in the interest of maintaining the peace process, aside from
periodic pro forma statements, the US and the EU have turned blind eyes to
the PA's routine and institutional glorification of terrorist mass murderers
and Nazi-style anti-Semitic indoctrination and incitement of Palestinian
society.
Given their absolute commitment to the so-called peace process, it would be
reasonable to expect the US and the EU to oppose the Palestinians' decision
to move their conflict with Israel from the negotiating table to the UN.
After all, in acting as they are, the Palestinians are making clear that
they are abandoning the sacrosanct peace process.
Alas, this is not the case.
The Obama administration is engaging in desperate eleventh hour diplomacy to
convince the Palestinians to cancel their UN plan because it does not wish
to oppose it. For their part, most EU member states are expected to support
the Palestinian bid at both the Security Council and the General Assembly.
The fact that the US and the EU are reluctant to oppose the Palestinian UN
initiative despite the fact that it destroys the foundations of the peace
process tells us two things about the Americans and the Europeans. First,
their support for the Palestinians has more in common with a psychological
obsession than with a rational policy decision.
The Obama administration, the EU bureaucracy and most EU member states are
obsessed with the Palestinians. There is nothing the Palestinians can say or
do to convince them that the Palestinian case is anything other than wholly
and completely just.
There are many possible explanations for how they arrived at this obsession.
But the fact is that it is an obsession. Like all obsessions, their faith in
the justice of the Palestinian cause is impermeable to contrary facts or
rational interests.
The flipside of this obsession is of course, a complementary obsession with
blaming Israel for everything that goes wrong. For if the Palestinians are
always in the right, and they are fighting Israel, then it naturally follows
that Israel is always in the wrong.
This "Blame Israel First" mindset was exposed in all its madness in a New
York Times editorial on Thursday.
Despite the Palestinians' refusal to negotiate with Israel, despite Fatah's
unity government deal with Hamas, and despite their rejection of Israel's
right to exist, the Times argued that Israel is to blame for the current
crisis in relations.
In the paper's view, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu "has been the most
intractable," party to the conflict. Netanyahu's crime? He has permitted
Jews in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem to exercise their property rights and
build on land they own.
Of course, that is not how the Times put it. In the Times' words, Netanyahu
has been "building settlements." Intrinsic to the Times' claim, (and to the
Obama administration's EU-supported demand that Israel disregard Jewish
property rights in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria), is an embrace of the
Palestinians' bigoted position that Jews must be banned from the future
Palestinian state.
That is, like the administration and the EU, the Times' support for the
"just Palestinian cause" is so comprehensive that its editors never even
question whether it is reasonable for them to be completely committed to the
establishment of a racist state. It is this inability to consider the
significance of their actions that removes Western support for the
Palestinians from realm of policy and into the sphere of neurosis.
The second lesson of the US and European unwillingness to oppose the
Palestinians' UN statehood bid is that the Obama administration and the EU
alike are obsessed with getting on the right side of inherently anti-Western
international institutions.
Here too, the reason that the position is an obsession rather than a
considered policy is because no conceivable rational US or European interest
is advanced by strengthening the UN and similar bodies.
Administration officials have repeatedly stated that they do not wish to
veto a Palestinian statehood resolution at the Security Council because they
do not want to isolate the US at the UN. It is due to their aversion to
isolation that the administration has worked so intensively in recent weeks
to convince the Palestinians to cancel their UN plans by pressuring Israel
to give them massive concessions.
It never seems to have occurred to anyone at the White House that standing
alone at the UN more often than not means standing up for US interests and
that standing with the crowd involves sacrificing US interests.
As for the EU, their automatic support of the UN is somewhat more
reasonable. Although the UN majority systematically empowers states and
forces that are hostile to Europe, many EU member states share the UN
majority's anti-Israel and anti-American positions. So by voting with the
majority, EU member states are able to act on their prejudices without
having to own up to them. Moreover, many EU states have irredentist Islamic
minorities. Joining the Israel bashers at the UN is a low cost way to
appease them.
Thursday Netanyahu announced that he will address the UN General Assembly in
New York next week and put the truth about the Palestinian cause on the
table.
Perhaps someone will be moved by his words.
Perhaps not.
But whether he makes a difference or not, at least reason will have one
defender at the UN next week.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com
osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
