I've started the wiki page (as mentioned in conversation today and minutes) where we can all add some common (and well understood) architecture resource types and relationships that are candidates for getting an open services namespace definition.
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AMResTypesV3 Clearly we want to re-use existing definitions so when at all possible include references to the authority. Also you can put resource definitions that already have a well known type URI in without the open services namespace (we don't want to duplicate existing definitions). <jim/> jim conallen CAM Lead Architect [email protected] Rational Software, IBM Software Group
